Re: [Resend v6 PATCH 2/2] ASoC: atmel-ssc: add pinctrl consumer

[Bo Shen <voice.shen@atmel.com>]

On 11/16/2012 14:41, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 02:33:50PM +0800, Bo Shen wrote:
>> On 11/16/2012 14:12, Mark Brown wrote:
>
>>> No, this isn't what was meant - the idea is to send only the addition of
>>> pinctrl data as one patch, based off the ASoC branch instead of -next.
>
>> What is the pinctrl data? (This patch can be applied on
>
> The data you're adding in the device tree!
>
>> sound/topic/atmel branch without any conflicts)
>
> That's not helpful to anyone doing bisection if there's nothing defining
> the pin states, it means that the system won't be able to start the
> driver as the API call will fail.
>
>> The other one add pinctrl nodes, must based on -next, or else I
>> don't know where should I add the pinctrl nodes.
>
> What makes you say this?

For example, if I want to add pinctrl node
---<8---
  ssc0 {
	pinctrl_ssc0_tx: ssc0_tx-0 {
         	atmel,pins = <1 16 0x1 0x0   /* PB16 periph A */
                 	      1 17 0x1 0x0   /* PB17 periph A */
                       	      1 18 0x1 0x0>; /* PB18 periph A */
         };
--->8---
This should be add into dtsi file as following
---<8---
ahb {
	apb {
		pinctrl {
			ssc0 {
				pinctrl_ssc0_tx
			}
		}
	}
}
--->8---

In the ASoC branch tree, I don't see any pinctrl related information. 
So, I say I don't know where should I add the pinctrl nodes.

May be I misunderstanding, do you mean I should only add as followign 
based on ASoC tree? And the upper go into pinctrl tree?
---<8---
ssc0: ssc@fffbc000 {
	compatible = "atmel,at91rm9200-ssc";
         reg = <0xfffbc000 0x4000>;
         interrupts = <14 4 5>;
+        pinctrl-names = "default";
+        pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_ssc0_tx &pinctrl_ssc0_rx>;
         status = "disable";
};
--->8---

Best Regards
Bo Shen