All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bo Shen <voice.shen@atmel.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: plagnioj@jcrosoft.com, nicolas.ferre@atmel.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-sound@vger.kernel.org,
	alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
Subject: Re: [Resend v6 PATCH 2/2] ASoC: atmel-ssc: add pinctrl consumer
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 09:43:33 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50AC31C5.2000504@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121120102712.GF10560@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>

Hi Mark,

On 11/20/2012 18:27, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 05:31:22PM +0800, Bo Shen wrote:
>
>>> based on ASoC tree? And the upper go into pinctrl tree?
>>> ---<8---
>>> ssc0: ssc@fffbc000 {
>>>      compatible = "atmel,at91rm9200-ssc";
>>>          reg = <0xfffbc000 0x4000>;
>>>          interrupts = <14 4 5>;
>>> +        pinctrl-names = "default";
>>> +        pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_ssc0_tx &pinctrl_ssc0_rx>;
>>>          status = "disable";
>>> };
>>> --->8---
>
>> Any suggestion for this? what should I do with this patch for next?
>
> Send it to pinctrl and we'll deal with the add/add.

So, should I keep these two patches [1] and [2] and then send to pinctrl 
again, or I need keep it in one patch as [3] which i sent first.

1. [Resend,v6,1/2] ARM: at91: atmel-ssc: add pinctrl nodes
    https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1753101/

2. [Resend,v6,2/2] ASoC: atmel-ssc: add pinctrl consumer
    https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1753091/

3. [v6,1/4] ARM: at91: atmel-ssc: add pinctrl support
    https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1740391/

Best regards,
Bo Shen


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Bo Shen <voice.shen@atmel.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: plagnioj@jcrosoft.com, nicolas.ferre@atmel.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-sound@vger.kernel.org,
	alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
Subject: Re: [Resend v6 PATCH 2/2] ASoC: atmel-ssc: add pinctrl consumer
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 01:43:33 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50AC31C5.2000504@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121120102712.GF10560@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>

Hi Mark,

On 11/20/2012 18:27, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 05:31:22PM +0800, Bo Shen wrote:
>
>>> based on ASoC tree? And the upper go into pinctrl tree?
>>> ---<8---
>>> ssc0: ssc@fffbc000 {
>>>      compatible = "atmel,at91rm9200-ssc";
>>>          reg = <0xfffbc000 0x4000>;
>>>          interrupts = <14 4 5>;
>>> +        pinctrl-names = "default";
>>> +        pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_ssc0_tx &pinctrl_ssc0_rx>;
>>>          status = "disable";
>>> };
>>> --->8---
>
>> Any suggestion for this? what should I do with this patch for next?
>
> Send it to pinctrl and we'll deal with the add/add.

So, should I keep these two patches [1] and [2] and then send to pinctrl 
again, or I need keep it in one patch as [3] which i sent first.

1. [Resend,v6,1/2] ARM: at91: atmel-ssc: add pinctrl nodes
    https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1753101/

2. [Resend,v6,2/2] ASoC: atmel-ssc: add pinctrl consumer
    https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1753091/

3. [v6,1/4] ARM: at91: atmel-ssc: add pinctrl support
    https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1740391/

Best regards,
Bo Shen


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: voice.shen@atmel.com (Bo Shen)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [Resend v6 PATCH 2/2] ASoC: atmel-ssc: add pinctrl consumer
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 09:43:33 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50AC31C5.2000504@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121120102712.GF10560@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>

Hi Mark,

On 11/20/2012 18:27, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 05:31:22PM +0800, Bo Shen wrote:
>
>>> based on ASoC tree? And the upper go into pinctrl tree?
>>> ---<8---
>>> ssc0: ssc at fffbc000 {
>>>      compatible = "atmel,at91rm9200-ssc";
>>>          reg = <0xfffbc000 0x4000>;
>>>          interrupts = <14 4 5>;
>>> +        pinctrl-names = "default";
>>> +        pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_ssc0_tx &pinctrl_ssc0_rx>;
>>>          status = "disable";
>>> };
>>> --->8---
>
>> Any suggestion for this? what should I do with this patch for next?
>
> Send it to pinctrl and we'll deal with the add/add.

So, should I keep these two patches [1] and [2] and then send to pinctrl 
again, or I need keep it in one patch as [3] which i sent first.

1. [Resend,v6,1/2] ARM: at91: atmel-ssc: add pinctrl nodes
    https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1753101/

2. [Resend,v6,2/2] ASoC: atmel-ssc: add pinctrl consumer
    https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1753091/

3. [v6,1/4] ARM: at91: atmel-ssc: add pinctrl support
    https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1740391/

Best regards,
Bo Shen

  reply	other threads:[~2012-11-21  1:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-16  6:03 [Resend v6 PATCH 1/2] ARM: at91: atmel-ssc: add pinctrl nodes Bo Shen
2012-11-16  6:03 ` Bo Shen
2012-11-16  6:03 ` Bo Shen
2012-11-16  6:03 ` [Resend v6 PATCH 2/2] ASoC: atmel-ssc: add pinctrl consumer Bo Shen
2012-11-16  6:03   ` Bo Shen
2012-11-16  6:03   ` Bo Shen
2012-11-16  6:12   ` Mark Brown
2012-11-16  6:12     ` Mark Brown
2012-11-16  6:12     ` Mark Brown
2012-11-16  6:33     ` Bo Shen
2012-11-16  6:33       ` Bo Shen
2012-11-16  6:33       ` Bo Shen
2012-11-16  6:41       ` Mark Brown
2012-11-16  6:41         ` Mark Brown
2012-11-16  6:41         ` Mark Brown
2012-11-16  6:59         ` Bo Shen
2012-11-16  6:59           ` Bo Shen
2012-11-16  6:59           ` Bo Shen
2012-11-20  9:31           ` Bo Shen
2012-11-20  9:31             ` Bo Shen
2012-11-20  9:31             ` Bo Shen
2012-11-20 10:27             ` Mark Brown
2012-11-20 10:27               ` Mark Brown
2012-11-20 10:27               ` Mark Brown
2012-11-21  1:43               ` Bo Shen [this message]
2012-11-21  1:43                 ` Bo Shen
2012-11-21  1:43                 ` Bo Shen
2012-11-21  1:46                 ` Mark Brown
2012-11-21  1:46                   ` Mark Brown
2012-11-21  1:46                   ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50AC31C5.2000504@atmel.com \
    --to=voice.shen@atmel.com \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-sound@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
    --cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.