All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Mounting SMB2 fails with -EINVAL on 3.7-rc7
@ 2012-11-27  9:21 Suresh Jayaraman
       [not found] ` <50B48601.6070000-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Suresh Jayaraman @ 2012-11-27  9:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-cifs, Steve French

When I try to mount a Samba (3.6.7) share via SMB2, the mount is failing.

   mount -t cifs -o vers=2.1,user=joe //server/share /mnt
   mount error (22): Invalid Argument

Looks like Negotiate Protocol is failing but not sure why.

Here's the cFYI snip:

[ 2895.256899] CIFS VFS: cifs_mount failed w/return code = -22
[ 2904.421947] fs/cifs/cifsfs.c: Devname: //164.99.140.187/local/ flags: 0 
[ 2904.421999] fs/cifs/connect.c: Username: cg
[ 2904.427252] fs/cifs/connect.c: file mode: 0x1ed  dir mode: 0x1ed
[ 2904.427434] fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS VFS: in cifs_mount as Xid: 15 with uid: 0
[ 2904.427439] fs/cifs/connect.c: UNC: \\164.99.140.187\local ip: 164.99.140.187
[ 2904.427489] fs/cifs/connect.c: Socket created
[ 2904.427493] fs/cifs/connect.c: sndbuf 16384 rcvbuf 87380 rcvtimeo 0x1b58
[ 2904.428276] fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS VFS: in cifs_get_smb_ses as Xid: 16 with uid: 0
[ 2904.428281] fs/cifs/connect.c: Existing smb sess not found
[ 2904.428288] fs/cifs/smb2pdu.c: Negotiate protocol
[ 2904.428295] fs/cifs/smb2pdu.c: sec_flags 0x87
[ 2904.428301] fs/cifs/transport.c: Sending smb: smb_len=102
[ 2904.428460] fs/cifs/connect.c: Demultiplex PID: 1899
[ 2904.429585] fs/cifs/connect.c: RFC1002 header 0x49
[ 2904.429593] fs/cifs/smb2misc.c: smb2_check_message length: 0x4d, smb_buf_length: 0x49
[ 2904.429596] fs/cifs/smb2misc.c: SMB2 data length 0 offset 0
[ 2904.429597] fs/cifs/smb2misc.c: SMB2 len 77
[ 2904.429648] fs/cifs/transport.c: cifs_sync_mid_result: cmd=0 mid=0 state=4
[ 2904.429654] Status code returned 0xc000000d STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER
[ 2904.429661] fs/cifs/smb2maperror.c: Mapping SMB2 status code -1073741811 to POSIX err -22
[ 2904.429663] fs/cifs/misc.c: Null buffer passed to cifs_small_buf_release
[ 2904.429667] fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS VFS: leaving cifs_get_smb_ses (xid = 16) rc = -22
[ 2904.429883] fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS VFS: leaving cifs_mount (xid = 15) rc = -22
[ 2904.429885] CIFS VFS: cifs_mount failed w/return code = -22


Is this a known issue?


-- 
Suresh Jayaraman

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: Mounting SMB2 fails with -EINVAL on 3.7-rc7
       [not found] ` <50B48601.6070000-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org>
@ 2012-11-27 12:56   ` Pavel Shilovsky
       [not found]     ` <CAKywueT-Wi_gS8SNOQ+Ac-MNFNSuN_ni1BA8neQsy0836w6BvA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Shilovsky @ 2012-11-27 12:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Suresh Jayaraman; +Cc: linux-cifs, Steve French

2012/11/27 Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org>:
> When I try to mount a Samba (3.6.7) share via SMB2, the mount is failing.
>
>    mount -t cifs -o vers=2.1,user=joe //server/share /mnt
>    mount error (22): Invalid Argument
>
> Looks like Negotiate Protocol is failing but not sure why.
>
> Here's the cFYI snip:
>
> [ 2895.256899] CIFS VFS: cifs_mount failed w/return code = -22
> [ 2904.421947] fs/cifs/cifsfs.c: Devname: //164.99.140.187/local/ flags: 0
> [ 2904.421999] fs/cifs/connect.c: Username: cg
> [ 2904.427252] fs/cifs/connect.c: file mode: 0x1ed  dir mode: 0x1ed
> [ 2904.427434] fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS VFS: in cifs_mount as Xid: 15 with uid: 0
> [ 2904.427439] fs/cifs/connect.c: UNC: \\164.99.140.187\local ip: 164.99.140.187
> [ 2904.427489] fs/cifs/connect.c: Socket created
> [ 2904.427493] fs/cifs/connect.c: sndbuf 16384 rcvbuf 87380 rcvtimeo 0x1b58
> [ 2904.428276] fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS VFS: in cifs_get_smb_ses as Xid: 16 with uid: 0
> [ 2904.428281] fs/cifs/connect.c: Existing smb sess not found
> [ 2904.428288] fs/cifs/smb2pdu.c: Negotiate protocol
> [ 2904.428295] fs/cifs/smb2pdu.c: sec_flags 0x87
> [ 2904.428301] fs/cifs/transport.c: Sending smb: smb_len=102
> [ 2904.428460] fs/cifs/connect.c: Demultiplex PID: 1899
> [ 2904.429585] fs/cifs/connect.c: RFC1002 header 0x49
> [ 2904.429593] fs/cifs/smb2misc.c: smb2_check_message length: 0x4d, smb_buf_length: 0x49
> [ 2904.429596] fs/cifs/smb2misc.c: SMB2 data length 0 offset 0
> [ 2904.429597] fs/cifs/smb2misc.c: SMB2 len 77
> [ 2904.429648] fs/cifs/transport.c: cifs_sync_mid_result: cmd=0 mid=0 state=4
> [ 2904.429654] Status code returned 0xc000000d STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER
> [ 2904.429661] fs/cifs/smb2maperror.c: Mapping SMB2 status code -1073741811 to POSIX err -22
> [ 2904.429663] fs/cifs/misc.c: Null buffer passed to cifs_small_buf_release
> [ 2904.429667] fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS VFS: leaving cifs_get_smb_ses (xid = 16) rc = -22
> [ 2904.429883] fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS VFS: leaving cifs_mount (xid = 15) rc = -22
> [ 2904.429885] CIFS VFS: cifs_mount failed w/return code = -22
>
>
> Is this a known issue?
>
>
> --
> Suresh Jayaraman
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Samba doesn't support SMB2.1 protocol - 2.0 only. We need to add a
mount option vers=2.0 to enable Samba support.

-- 
Best regards,
Pavel Shilovsky.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: Mounting SMB2 fails with -EINVAL on 3.7-rc7
       [not found]     ` <CAKywueT-Wi_gS8SNOQ+Ac-MNFNSuN_ni1BA8neQsy0836w6BvA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
@ 2012-11-27 13:00       ` Suresh Jayaraman
       [not found]         ` <50B4B972.8070604-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Suresh Jayaraman @ 2012-11-27 13:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Pavel Shilovsky; +Cc: linux-cifs, Steve French

On 11/27/2012 06:26 PM, Pavel Shilovsky wrote:
> 2012/11/27 Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org>:
>> When I try to mount a Samba (3.6.7) share via SMB2, the mount is failing.
>>
>>    mount -t cifs -o vers=2.1,user=joe //server/share /mnt
>>    mount error (22): Invalid Argument
>>
>> Looks like Negotiate Protocol is failing but not sure why.
>>
>> Here's the cFYI snip:
>>
>> [ 2895.256899] CIFS VFS: cifs_mount failed w/return code = -22
>> [ 2904.421947] fs/cifs/cifsfs.c: Devname: //164.99.140.187/local/ flags: 0
>> [ 2904.421999] fs/cifs/connect.c: Username: cg
>> [ 2904.427252] fs/cifs/connect.c: file mode: 0x1ed  dir mode: 0x1ed
>> [ 2904.427434] fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS VFS: in cifs_mount as Xid: 15 with uid: 0
>> [ 2904.427439] fs/cifs/connect.c: UNC: \\164.99.140.187\local ip: 164.99.140.187
>> [ 2904.427489] fs/cifs/connect.c: Socket created
>> [ 2904.427493] fs/cifs/connect.c: sndbuf 16384 rcvbuf 87380 rcvtimeo 0x1b58
>> [ 2904.428276] fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS VFS: in cifs_get_smb_ses as Xid: 16 with uid: 0
>> [ 2904.428281] fs/cifs/connect.c: Existing smb sess not found
>> [ 2904.428288] fs/cifs/smb2pdu.c: Negotiate protocol
>> [ 2904.428295] fs/cifs/smb2pdu.c: sec_flags 0x87
>> [ 2904.428301] fs/cifs/transport.c: Sending smb: smb_len=102
>> [ 2904.428460] fs/cifs/connect.c: Demultiplex PID: 1899
>> [ 2904.429585] fs/cifs/connect.c: RFC1002 header 0x49
>> [ 2904.429593] fs/cifs/smb2misc.c: smb2_check_message length: 0x4d, smb_buf_length: 0x49
>> [ 2904.429596] fs/cifs/smb2misc.c: SMB2 data length 0 offset 0
>> [ 2904.429597] fs/cifs/smb2misc.c: SMB2 len 77
>> [ 2904.429648] fs/cifs/transport.c: cifs_sync_mid_result: cmd=0 mid=0 state=4
>> [ 2904.429654] Status code returned 0xc000000d STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER
>> [ 2904.429661] fs/cifs/smb2maperror.c: Mapping SMB2 status code -1073741811 to POSIX err -22
>> [ 2904.429663] fs/cifs/misc.c: Null buffer passed to cifs_small_buf_release
>> [ 2904.429667] fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS VFS: leaving cifs_get_smb_ses (xid = 16) rc = -22
>> [ 2904.429883] fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS VFS: leaving cifs_mount (xid = 15) rc = -22
>> [ 2904.429885] CIFS VFS: cifs_mount failed w/return code = -22
>>
>>
>> Is this a known issue?
>>
> Samba doesn't support SMB2.1 protocol - 2.0 only. We need to add a
> mount option vers=2.0 to enable Samba support.
> 

Ah, ok. I see

enum smb_version {
        Smb_1 = 1,
        Smb_21,
        Smb_30,
};

So, at the current state we won't be able to use smb2 client with Samba
server, right?


Thanks

-- 
Suresh Jayaraman

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: Mounting SMB2 fails with -EINVAL on 3.7-rc7
       [not found]         ` <50B4B972.8070604-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org>
@ 2012-11-27 13:21           ` Pavel Shilovsky
       [not found]             ` <CAKywueSm5K_H870mvQED02fqKoY8FTR=T+RhAo6hk3VzN3Jd4g-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Shilovsky @ 2012-11-27 13:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Suresh Jayaraman, Steve French; +Cc: linux-cifs

2012/11/27 Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org>:
> On 11/27/2012 06:26 PM, Pavel Shilovsky wrote:
>> 2012/11/27 Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org>:
>>> When I try to mount a Samba (3.6.7) share via SMB2, the mount is failing.
>>>
>>>    mount -t cifs -o vers=2.1,user=joe //server/share /mnt
>>>    mount error (22): Invalid Argument
>>>
>>> Looks like Negotiate Protocol is failing but not sure why.
>>>
>>> Here's the cFYI snip:
>>>
>>> [ 2895.256899] CIFS VFS: cifs_mount failed w/return code = -22
>>> [ 2904.421947] fs/cifs/cifsfs.c: Devname: //164.99.140.187/local/ flags: 0
>>> [ 2904.421999] fs/cifs/connect.c: Username: cg
>>> [ 2904.427252] fs/cifs/connect.c: file mode: 0x1ed  dir mode: 0x1ed
>>> [ 2904.427434] fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS VFS: in cifs_mount as Xid: 15 with uid: 0
>>> [ 2904.427439] fs/cifs/connect.c: UNC: \\164.99.140.187\local ip: 164.99.140.187
>>> [ 2904.427489] fs/cifs/connect.c: Socket created
>>> [ 2904.427493] fs/cifs/connect.c: sndbuf 16384 rcvbuf 87380 rcvtimeo 0x1b58
>>> [ 2904.428276] fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS VFS: in cifs_get_smb_ses as Xid: 16 with uid: 0
>>> [ 2904.428281] fs/cifs/connect.c: Existing smb sess not found
>>> [ 2904.428288] fs/cifs/smb2pdu.c: Negotiate protocol
>>> [ 2904.428295] fs/cifs/smb2pdu.c: sec_flags 0x87
>>> [ 2904.428301] fs/cifs/transport.c: Sending smb: smb_len=102
>>> [ 2904.428460] fs/cifs/connect.c: Demultiplex PID: 1899
>>> [ 2904.429585] fs/cifs/connect.c: RFC1002 header 0x49
>>> [ 2904.429593] fs/cifs/smb2misc.c: smb2_check_message length: 0x4d, smb_buf_length: 0x49
>>> [ 2904.429596] fs/cifs/smb2misc.c: SMB2 data length 0 offset 0
>>> [ 2904.429597] fs/cifs/smb2misc.c: SMB2 len 77
>>> [ 2904.429648] fs/cifs/transport.c: cifs_sync_mid_result: cmd=0 mid=0 state=4
>>> [ 2904.429654] Status code returned 0xc000000d STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER
>>> [ 2904.429661] fs/cifs/smb2maperror.c: Mapping SMB2 status code -1073741811 to POSIX err -22
>>> [ 2904.429663] fs/cifs/misc.c: Null buffer passed to cifs_small_buf_release
>>> [ 2904.429667] fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS VFS: leaving cifs_get_smb_ses (xid = 16) rc = -22
>>> [ 2904.429883] fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS VFS: leaving cifs_mount (xid = 15) rc = -22
>>> [ 2904.429885] CIFS VFS: cifs_mount failed w/return code = -22
>>>
>>>
>>> Is this a known issue?
>>>
>> Samba doesn't support SMB2.1 protocol - 2.0 only. We need to add a
>> mount option vers=2.0 to enable Samba support.
>>
>
> Ah, ok. I see
>
> enum smb_version {
>         Smb_1 = 1,
>         Smb_21,
>         Smb_30,
> };
>
> So, at the current state we won't be able to use smb2 client with Samba
> server, right?

Yes. Steve, any plans on returning SMB2.0 support to the client? (it
was removed after we decide that vers=2.1 mount option should
negotiate 2.1 protocol only).

-- 
Best regards,
Pavel Shilovsky.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: Mounting SMB2 fails with -EINVAL on 3.7-rc7
       [not found]             ` <CAKywueSm5K_H870mvQED02fqKoY8FTR=T+RhAo6hk3VzN3Jd4g-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
@ 2012-11-27 16:27               ` Steve French
       [not found]                 ` <CAH2r5msNJSdS5Pq3+PY0Lndg0C22GR-27HNA8vzBVfT50x3uQA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Steve French @ 2012-11-27 16:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Pavel Shilovsky; +Cc: Suresh Jayaraman, linux-cifs

I have a patch for 2.0 support that was in my for-next branch for a
little bit but I decided was too late for 3.7

On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 7:21 AM, Pavel Shilovsky <piastryyy-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> 2012/11/27 Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org>:
>> On 11/27/2012 06:26 PM, Pavel Shilovsky wrote:
>>> 2012/11/27 Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org>:
>>>> When I try to mount a Samba (3.6.7) share via SMB2, the mount is failing.
>>>>
>>>>    mount -t cifs -o vers=2.1,user=joe //server/share /mnt
>>>>    mount error (22): Invalid Argument
>>>>
>>>> Looks like Negotiate Protocol is failing but not sure why.
>>>>
>>>> Here's the cFYI snip:
>>>>
>>>> [ 2895.256899] CIFS VFS: cifs_mount failed w/return code = -22
>>>> [ 2904.421947] fs/cifs/cifsfs.c: Devname: //164.99.140.187/local/ flags: 0
>>>> [ 2904.421999] fs/cifs/connect.c: Username: cg
>>>> [ 2904.427252] fs/cifs/connect.c: file mode: 0x1ed  dir mode: 0x1ed
>>>> [ 2904.427434] fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS VFS: in cifs_mount as Xid: 15 with uid: 0
>>>> [ 2904.427439] fs/cifs/connect.c: UNC: \\164.99.140.187\local ip: 164.99.140.187
>>>> [ 2904.427489] fs/cifs/connect.c: Socket created
>>>> [ 2904.427493] fs/cifs/connect.c: sndbuf 16384 rcvbuf 87380 rcvtimeo 0x1b58
>>>> [ 2904.428276] fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS VFS: in cifs_get_smb_ses as Xid: 16 with uid: 0
>>>> [ 2904.428281] fs/cifs/connect.c: Existing smb sess not found
>>>> [ 2904.428288] fs/cifs/smb2pdu.c: Negotiate protocol
>>>> [ 2904.428295] fs/cifs/smb2pdu.c: sec_flags 0x87
>>>> [ 2904.428301] fs/cifs/transport.c: Sending smb: smb_len=102
>>>> [ 2904.428460] fs/cifs/connect.c: Demultiplex PID: 1899
>>>> [ 2904.429585] fs/cifs/connect.c: RFC1002 header 0x49
>>>> [ 2904.429593] fs/cifs/smb2misc.c: smb2_check_message length: 0x4d, smb_buf_length: 0x49
>>>> [ 2904.429596] fs/cifs/smb2misc.c: SMB2 data length 0 offset 0
>>>> [ 2904.429597] fs/cifs/smb2misc.c: SMB2 len 77
>>>> [ 2904.429648] fs/cifs/transport.c: cifs_sync_mid_result: cmd=0 mid=0 state=4
>>>> [ 2904.429654] Status code returned 0xc000000d STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER
>>>> [ 2904.429661] fs/cifs/smb2maperror.c: Mapping SMB2 status code -1073741811 to POSIX err -22
>>>> [ 2904.429663] fs/cifs/misc.c: Null buffer passed to cifs_small_buf_release
>>>> [ 2904.429667] fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS VFS: leaving cifs_get_smb_ses (xid = 16) rc = -22
>>>> [ 2904.429883] fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS VFS: leaving cifs_mount (xid = 15) rc = -22
>>>> [ 2904.429885] CIFS VFS: cifs_mount failed w/return code = -22
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Is this a known issue?
>>>>
>>> Samba doesn't support SMB2.1 protocol - 2.0 only. We need to add a
>>> mount option vers=2.0 to enable Samba support.
>>>
>>
>> Ah, ok. I see
>>
>> enum smb_version {
>>         Smb_1 = 1,
>>         Smb_21,
>>         Smb_30,
>> };
>>
>> So, at the current state we won't be able to use smb2 client with Samba
>> server, right?
>
> Yes. Steve, any plans on returning SMB2.0 support to the client? (it
> was removed after we decide that vers=2.1 mount option should
> negotiate 2.1 protocol only).
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Pavel Shilovsky.



-- 
Thanks,

Steve

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: Mounting SMB2 fails with -EINVAL on 3.7-rc7
       [not found]                 ` <CAH2r5msNJSdS5Pq3+PY0Lndg0C22GR-27HNA8vzBVfT50x3uQA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
@ 2012-11-28 13:49                   ` Pavel Shilovsky
       [not found]                     ` <CAKywueSRRuCDJxDgnHURSGY9qAvc_kb4BuKMoMaxCbjh4UPrNg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Shilovsky @ 2012-11-28 13:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Steve French; +Cc: Suresh Jayaraman, linux-cifs

2012/11/27 Steve French <smfrench-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>:
> I have a patch for 2.0 support that was in my for-next branch for a
> little bit but I decided was too late for 3.7

Are your going to re-add it again for 3.8? (I think it's important to
support Samba - my be we should backport it to v3.7 too during stable
series)

-- 
Best regards,
Pavel Shilovsky.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: Mounting SMB2 fails with -EINVAL on 3.7-rc7
       [not found]                     ` <CAKywueSRRuCDJxDgnHURSGY9qAvc_kb4BuKMoMaxCbjh4UPrNg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
@ 2012-11-28 16:08                       ` Suresh Jayaraman
       [not found]                         ` <50B6370F.2060402-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Suresh Jayaraman @ 2012-11-28 16:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Pavel Shilovsky; +Cc: Steve French, linux-cifs

On 11/28/2012 07:19 PM, Pavel Shilovsky wrote:
> 2012/11/27 Steve French <smfrench-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>:
>> I have a patch for 2.0 support that was in my for-next branch for a
>> little bit but I decided was too late for 3.7
> 
> Are your going to re-add it again for 3.8? (I think it's important to
> support Samba - my be we should backport it to v3.7 too during stable
> series)
> 

While I agree that it is quite important for smb client to work with
Samba, I'm not sure whether this patch would meet the -stable criteria...

-- 
Suresh Jayaraman

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: Mounting SMB2 fails with -EINVAL on 3.7-rc7
       [not found]                         ` <50B6370F.2060402-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org>
@ 2012-11-29  5:38                           ` Steve French
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Steve French @ 2012-11-29  5:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Suresh Jayaraman; +Cc: Pavel Shilovsky, linux-cifs

The patch for 2.02 dialect support was reviewed by Pavel and is now in
cifs-2.6.git for next (destined for 3.8).

On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> On 11/28/2012 07:19 PM, Pavel Shilovsky wrote:
>> 2012/11/27 Steve French <smfrench-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>:
>>> I have a patch for 2.0 support that was in my for-next branch for a
>>> little bit but I decided was too late for 3.7
>>
>> Are your going to re-add it again for 3.8? (I think it's important to
>> support Samba - my be we should backport it to v3.7 too during stable
>> series)
>>
>
> While I agree that it is quite important for smb client to work with
> Samba, I'm not sure whether this patch would meet the -stable criteria...
>
> --
> Suresh Jayaraman



-- 
Thanks,

Steve

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2012-11-29  5:38 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-11-27  9:21 Mounting SMB2 fails with -EINVAL on 3.7-rc7 Suresh Jayaraman
     [not found] ` <50B48601.6070000-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-27 12:56   ` Pavel Shilovsky
     [not found]     ` <CAKywueT-Wi_gS8SNOQ+Ac-MNFNSuN_ni1BA8neQsy0836w6BvA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-27 13:00       ` Suresh Jayaraman
     [not found]         ` <50B4B972.8070604-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-27 13:21           ` Pavel Shilovsky
     [not found]             ` <CAKywueSm5K_H870mvQED02fqKoY8FTR=T+RhAo6hk3VzN3Jd4g-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-27 16:27               ` Steve French
     [not found]                 ` <CAH2r5msNJSdS5Pq3+PY0Lndg0C22GR-27HNA8vzBVfT50x3uQA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-28 13:49                   ` Pavel Shilovsky
     [not found]                     ` <CAKywueSRRuCDJxDgnHURSGY9qAvc_kb4BuKMoMaxCbjh4UPrNg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-28 16:08                       ` Suresh Jayaraman
     [not found]                         ` <50B6370F.2060402-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-29  5:38                           ` Steve French

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.