* Mounting SMB2 fails with -EINVAL on 3.7-rc7
@ 2012-11-27 9:21 Suresh Jayaraman
[not found] ` <50B48601.6070000-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Suresh Jayaraman @ 2012-11-27 9:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-cifs, Steve French
When I try to mount a Samba (3.6.7) share via SMB2, the mount is failing.
mount -t cifs -o vers=2.1,user=joe //server/share /mnt
mount error (22): Invalid Argument
Looks like Negotiate Protocol is failing but not sure why.
Here's the cFYI snip:
[ 2895.256899] CIFS VFS: cifs_mount failed w/return code = -22
[ 2904.421947] fs/cifs/cifsfs.c: Devname: //164.99.140.187/local/ flags: 0
[ 2904.421999] fs/cifs/connect.c: Username: cg
[ 2904.427252] fs/cifs/connect.c: file mode: 0x1ed dir mode: 0x1ed
[ 2904.427434] fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS VFS: in cifs_mount as Xid: 15 with uid: 0
[ 2904.427439] fs/cifs/connect.c: UNC: \\164.99.140.187\local ip: 164.99.140.187
[ 2904.427489] fs/cifs/connect.c: Socket created
[ 2904.427493] fs/cifs/connect.c: sndbuf 16384 rcvbuf 87380 rcvtimeo 0x1b58
[ 2904.428276] fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS VFS: in cifs_get_smb_ses as Xid: 16 with uid: 0
[ 2904.428281] fs/cifs/connect.c: Existing smb sess not found
[ 2904.428288] fs/cifs/smb2pdu.c: Negotiate protocol
[ 2904.428295] fs/cifs/smb2pdu.c: sec_flags 0x87
[ 2904.428301] fs/cifs/transport.c: Sending smb: smb_len=102
[ 2904.428460] fs/cifs/connect.c: Demultiplex PID: 1899
[ 2904.429585] fs/cifs/connect.c: RFC1002 header 0x49
[ 2904.429593] fs/cifs/smb2misc.c: smb2_check_message length: 0x4d, smb_buf_length: 0x49
[ 2904.429596] fs/cifs/smb2misc.c: SMB2 data length 0 offset 0
[ 2904.429597] fs/cifs/smb2misc.c: SMB2 len 77
[ 2904.429648] fs/cifs/transport.c: cifs_sync_mid_result: cmd=0 mid=0 state=4
[ 2904.429654] Status code returned 0xc000000d STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER
[ 2904.429661] fs/cifs/smb2maperror.c: Mapping SMB2 status code -1073741811 to POSIX err -22
[ 2904.429663] fs/cifs/misc.c: Null buffer passed to cifs_small_buf_release
[ 2904.429667] fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS VFS: leaving cifs_get_smb_ses (xid = 16) rc = -22
[ 2904.429883] fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS VFS: leaving cifs_mount (xid = 15) rc = -22
[ 2904.429885] CIFS VFS: cifs_mount failed w/return code = -22
Is this a known issue?
--
Suresh Jayaraman
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread[parent not found: <50B48601.6070000-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: Mounting SMB2 fails with -EINVAL on 3.7-rc7 [not found] ` <50B48601.6070000-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org> @ 2012-11-27 12:56 ` Pavel Shilovsky [not found] ` <CAKywueT-Wi_gS8SNOQ+Ac-MNFNSuN_ni1BA8neQsy0836w6BvA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Pavel Shilovsky @ 2012-11-27 12:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Suresh Jayaraman; +Cc: linux-cifs, Steve French 2012/11/27 Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org>: > When I try to mount a Samba (3.6.7) share via SMB2, the mount is failing. > > mount -t cifs -o vers=2.1,user=joe //server/share /mnt > mount error (22): Invalid Argument > > Looks like Negotiate Protocol is failing but not sure why. > > Here's the cFYI snip: > > [ 2895.256899] CIFS VFS: cifs_mount failed w/return code = -22 > [ 2904.421947] fs/cifs/cifsfs.c: Devname: //164.99.140.187/local/ flags: 0 > [ 2904.421999] fs/cifs/connect.c: Username: cg > [ 2904.427252] fs/cifs/connect.c: file mode: 0x1ed dir mode: 0x1ed > [ 2904.427434] fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS VFS: in cifs_mount as Xid: 15 with uid: 0 > [ 2904.427439] fs/cifs/connect.c: UNC: \\164.99.140.187\local ip: 164.99.140.187 > [ 2904.427489] fs/cifs/connect.c: Socket created > [ 2904.427493] fs/cifs/connect.c: sndbuf 16384 rcvbuf 87380 rcvtimeo 0x1b58 > [ 2904.428276] fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS VFS: in cifs_get_smb_ses as Xid: 16 with uid: 0 > [ 2904.428281] fs/cifs/connect.c: Existing smb sess not found > [ 2904.428288] fs/cifs/smb2pdu.c: Negotiate protocol > [ 2904.428295] fs/cifs/smb2pdu.c: sec_flags 0x87 > [ 2904.428301] fs/cifs/transport.c: Sending smb: smb_len=102 > [ 2904.428460] fs/cifs/connect.c: Demultiplex PID: 1899 > [ 2904.429585] fs/cifs/connect.c: RFC1002 header 0x49 > [ 2904.429593] fs/cifs/smb2misc.c: smb2_check_message length: 0x4d, smb_buf_length: 0x49 > [ 2904.429596] fs/cifs/smb2misc.c: SMB2 data length 0 offset 0 > [ 2904.429597] fs/cifs/smb2misc.c: SMB2 len 77 > [ 2904.429648] fs/cifs/transport.c: cifs_sync_mid_result: cmd=0 mid=0 state=4 > [ 2904.429654] Status code returned 0xc000000d STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER > [ 2904.429661] fs/cifs/smb2maperror.c: Mapping SMB2 status code -1073741811 to POSIX err -22 > [ 2904.429663] fs/cifs/misc.c: Null buffer passed to cifs_small_buf_release > [ 2904.429667] fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS VFS: leaving cifs_get_smb_ses (xid = 16) rc = -22 > [ 2904.429883] fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS VFS: leaving cifs_mount (xid = 15) rc = -22 > [ 2904.429885] CIFS VFS: cifs_mount failed w/return code = -22 > > > Is this a known issue? > > > -- > Suresh Jayaraman > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in > the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Samba doesn't support SMB2.1 protocol - 2.0 only. We need to add a mount option vers=2.0 to enable Samba support. -- Best regards, Pavel Shilovsky. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <CAKywueT-Wi_gS8SNOQ+Ac-MNFNSuN_ni1BA8neQsy0836w6BvA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: Mounting SMB2 fails with -EINVAL on 3.7-rc7 [not found] ` <CAKywueT-Wi_gS8SNOQ+Ac-MNFNSuN_ni1BA8neQsy0836w6BvA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> @ 2012-11-27 13:00 ` Suresh Jayaraman [not found] ` <50B4B972.8070604-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Suresh Jayaraman @ 2012-11-27 13:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Pavel Shilovsky; +Cc: linux-cifs, Steve French On 11/27/2012 06:26 PM, Pavel Shilovsky wrote: > 2012/11/27 Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org>: >> When I try to mount a Samba (3.6.7) share via SMB2, the mount is failing. >> >> mount -t cifs -o vers=2.1,user=joe //server/share /mnt >> mount error (22): Invalid Argument >> >> Looks like Negotiate Protocol is failing but not sure why. >> >> Here's the cFYI snip: >> >> [ 2895.256899] CIFS VFS: cifs_mount failed w/return code = -22 >> [ 2904.421947] fs/cifs/cifsfs.c: Devname: //164.99.140.187/local/ flags: 0 >> [ 2904.421999] fs/cifs/connect.c: Username: cg >> [ 2904.427252] fs/cifs/connect.c: file mode: 0x1ed dir mode: 0x1ed >> [ 2904.427434] fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS VFS: in cifs_mount as Xid: 15 with uid: 0 >> [ 2904.427439] fs/cifs/connect.c: UNC: \\164.99.140.187\local ip: 164.99.140.187 >> [ 2904.427489] fs/cifs/connect.c: Socket created >> [ 2904.427493] fs/cifs/connect.c: sndbuf 16384 rcvbuf 87380 rcvtimeo 0x1b58 >> [ 2904.428276] fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS VFS: in cifs_get_smb_ses as Xid: 16 with uid: 0 >> [ 2904.428281] fs/cifs/connect.c: Existing smb sess not found >> [ 2904.428288] fs/cifs/smb2pdu.c: Negotiate protocol >> [ 2904.428295] fs/cifs/smb2pdu.c: sec_flags 0x87 >> [ 2904.428301] fs/cifs/transport.c: Sending smb: smb_len=102 >> [ 2904.428460] fs/cifs/connect.c: Demultiplex PID: 1899 >> [ 2904.429585] fs/cifs/connect.c: RFC1002 header 0x49 >> [ 2904.429593] fs/cifs/smb2misc.c: smb2_check_message length: 0x4d, smb_buf_length: 0x49 >> [ 2904.429596] fs/cifs/smb2misc.c: SMB2 data length 0 offset 0 >> [ 2904.429597] fs/cifs/smb2misc.c: SMB2 len 77 >> [ 2904.429648] fs/cifs/transport.c: cifs_sync_mid_result: cmd=0 mid=0 state=4 >> [ 2904.429654] Status code returned 0xc000000d STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER >> [ 2904.429661] fs/cifs/smb2maperror.c: Mapping SMB2 status code -1073741811 to POSIX err -22 >> [ 2904.429663] fs/cifs/misc.c: Null buffer passed to cifs_small_buf_release >> [ 2904.429667] fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS VFS: leaving cifs_get_smb_ses (xid = 16) rc = -22 >> [ 2904.429883] fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS VFS: leaving cifs_mount (xid = 15) rc = -22 >> [ 2904.429885] CIFS VFS: cifs_mount failed w/return code = -22 >> >> >> Is this a known issue? >> > Samba doesn't support SMB2.1 protocol - 2.0 only. We need to add a > mount option vers=2.0 to enable Samba support. > Ah, ok. I see enum smb_version { Smb_1 = 1, Smb_21, Smb_30, }; So, at the current state we won't be able to use smb2 client with Samba server, right? Thanks -- Suresh Jayaraman ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <50B4B972.8070604-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: Mounting SMB2 fails with -EINVAL on 3.7-rc7 [not found] ` <50B4B972.8070604-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org> @ 2012-11-27 13:21 ` Pavel Shilovsky [not found] ` <CAKywueSm5K_H870mvQED02fqKoY8FTR=T+RhAo6hk3VzN3Jd4g-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Pavel Shilovsky @ 2012-11-27 13:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Suresh Jayaraman, Steve French; +Cc: linux-cifs 2012/11/27 Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org>: > On 11/27/2012 06:26 PM, Pavel Shilovsky wrote: >> 2012/11/27 Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org>: >>> When I try to mount a Samba (3.6.7) share via SMB2, the mount is failing. >>> >>> mount -t cifs -o vers=2.1,user=joe //server/share /mnt >>> mount error (22): Invalid Argument >>> >>> Looks like Negotiate Protocol is failing but not sure why. >>> >>> Here's the cFYI snip: >>> >>> [ 2895.256899] CIFS VFS: cifs_mount failed w/return code = -22 >>> [ 2904.421947] fs/cifs/cifsfs.c: Devname: //164.99.140.187/local/ flags: 0 >>> [ 2904.421999] fs/cifs/connect.c: Username: cg >>> [ 2904.427252] fs/cifs/connect.c: file mode: 0x1ed dir mode: 0x1ed >>> [ 2904.427434] fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS VFS: in cifs_mount as Xid: 15 with uid: 0 >>> [ 2904.427439] fs/cifs/connect.c: UNC: \\164.99.140.187\local ip: 164.99.140.187 >>> [ 2904.427489] fs/cifs/connect.c: Socket created >>> [ 2904.427493] fs/cifs/connect.c: sndbuf 16384 rcvbuf 87380 rcvtimeo 0x1b58 >>> [ 2904.428276] fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS VFS: in cifs_get_smb_ses as Xid: 16 with uid: 0 >>> [ 2904.428281] fs/cifs/connect.c: Existing smb sess not found >>> [ 2904.428288] fs/cifs/smb2pdu.c: Negotiate protocol >>> [ 2904.428295] fs/cifs/smb2pdu.c: sec_flags 0x87 >>> [ 2904.428301] fs/cifs/transport.c: Sending smb: smb_len=102 >>> [ 2904.428460] fs/cifs/connect.c: Demultiplex PID: 1899 >>> [ 2904.429585] fs/cifs/connect.c: RFC1002 header 0x49 >>> [ 2904.429593] fs/cifs/smb2misc.c: smb2_check_message length: 0x4d, smb_buf_length: 0x49 >>> [ 2904.429596] fs/cifs/smb2misc.c: SMB2 data length 0 offset 0 >>> [ 2904.429597] fs/cifs/smb2misc.c: SMB2 len 77 >>> [ 2904.429648] fs/cifs/transport.c: cifs_sync_mid_result: cmd=0 mid=0 state=4 >>> [ 2904.429654] Status code returned 0xc000000d STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER >>> [ 2904.429661] fs/cifs/smb2maperror.c: Mapping SMB2 status code -1073741811 to POSIX err -22 >>> [ 2904.429663] fs/cifs/misc.c: Null buffer passed to cifs_small_buf_release >>> [ 2904.429667] fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS VFS: leaving cifs_get_smb_ses (xid = 16) rc = -22 >>> [ 2904.429883] fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS VFS: leaving cifs_mount (xid = 15) rc = -22 >>> [ 2904.429885] CIFS VFS: cifs_mount failed w/return code = -22 >>> >>> >>> Is this a known issue? >>> >> Samba doesn't support SMB2.1 protocol - 2.0 only. We need to add a >> mount option vers=2.0 to enable Samba support. >> > > Ah, ok. I see > > enum smb_version { > Smb_1 = 1, > Smb_21, > Smb_30, > }; > > So, at the current state we won't be able to use smb2 client with Samba > server, right? Yes. Steve, any plans on returning SMB2.0 support to the client? (it was removed after we decide that vers=2.1 mount option should negotiate 2.1 protocol only). -- Best regards, Pavel Shilovsky. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <CAKywueSm5K_H870mvQED02fqKoY8FTR=T+RhAo6hk3VzN3Jd4g-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: Mounting SMB2 fails with -EINVAL on 3.7-rc7 [not found] ` <CAKywueSm5K_H870mvQED02fqKoY8FTR=T+RhAo6hk3VzN3Jd4g-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> @ 2012-11-27 16:27 ` Steve French [not found] ` <CAH2r5msNJSdS5Pq3+PY0Lndg0C22GR-27HNA8vzBVfT50x3uQA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Steve French @ 2012-11-27 16:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Pavel Shilovsky; +Cc: Suresh Jayaraman, linux-cifs I have a patch for 2.0 support that was in my for-next branch for a little bit but I decided was too late for 3.7 On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 7:21 AM, Pavel Shilovsky <piastryyy-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: > 2012/11/27 Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org>: >> On 11/27/2012 06:26 PM, Pavel Shilovsky wrote: >>> 2012/11/27 Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org>: >>>> When I try to mount a Samba (3.6.7) share via SMB2, the mount is failing. >>>> >>>> mount -t cifs -o vers=2.1,user=joe //server/share /mnt >>>> mount error (22): Invalid Argument >>>> >>>> Looks like Negotiate Protocol is failing but not sure why. >>>> >>>> Here's the cFYI snip: >>>> >>>> [ 2895.256899] CIFS VFS: cifs_mount failed w/return code = -22 >>>> [ 2904.421947] fs/cifs/cifsfs.c: Devname: //164.99.140.187/local/ flags: 0 >>>> [ 2904.421999] fs/cifs/connect.c: Username: cg >>>> [ 2904.427252] fs/cifs/connect.c: file mode: 0x1ed dir mode: 0x1ed >>>> [ 2904.427434] fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS VFS: in cifs_mount as Xid: 15 with uid: 0 >>>> [ 2904.427439] fs/cifs/connect.c: UNC: \\164.99.140.187\local ip: 164.99.140.187 >>>> [ 2904.427489] fs/cifs/connect.c: Socket created >>>> [ 2904.427493] fs/cifs/connect.c: sndbuf 16384 rcvbuf 87380 rcvtimeo 0x1b58 >>>> [ 2904.428276] fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS VFS: in cifs_get_smb_ses as Xid: 16 with uid: 0 >>>> [ 2904.428281] fs/cifs/connect.c: Existing smb sess not found >>>> [ 2904.428288] fs/cifs/smb2pdu.c: Negotiate protocol >>>> [ 2904.428295] fs/cifs/smb2pdu.c: sec_flags 0x87 >>>> [ 2904.428301] fs/cifs/transport.c: Sending smb: smb_len=102 >>>> [ 2904.428460] fs/cifs/connect.c: Demultiplex PID: 1899 >>>> [ 2904.429585] fs/cifs/connect.c: RFC1002 header 0x49 >>>> [ 2904.429593] fs/cifs/smb2misc.c: smb2_check_message length: 0x4d, smb_buf_length: 0x49 >>>> [ 2904.429596] fs/cifs/smb2misc.c: SMB2 data length 0 offset 0 >>>> [ 2904.429597] fs/cifs/smb2misc.c: SMB2 len 77 >>>> [ 2904.429648] fs/cifs/transport.c: cifs_sync_mid_result: cmd=0 mid=0 state=4 >>>> [ 2904.429654] Status code returned 0xc000000d STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER >>>> [ 2904.429661] fs/cifs/smb2maperror.c: Mapping SMB2 status code -1073741811 to POSIX err -22 >>>> [ 2904.429663] fs/cifs/misc.c: Null buffer passed to cifs_small_buf_release >>>> [ 2904.429667] fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS VFS: leaving cifs_get_smb_ses (xid = 16) rc = -22 >>>> [ 2904.429883] fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS VFS: leaving cifs_mount (xid = 15) rc = -22 >>>> [ 2904.429885] CIFS VFS: cifs_mount failed w/return code = -22 >>>> >>>> >>>> Is this a known issue? >>>> >>> Samba doesn't support SMB2.1 protocol - 2.0 only. We need to add a >>> mount option vers=2.0 to enable Samba support. >>> >> >> Ah, ok. I see >> >> enum smb_version { >> Smb_1 = 1, >> Smb_21, >> Smb_30, >> }; >> >> So, at the current state we won't be able to use smb2 client with Samba >> server, right? > > Yes. Steve, any plans on returning SMB2.0 support to the client? (it > was removed after we decide that vers=2.1 mount option should > negotiate 2.1 protocol only). > > -- > Best regards, > Pavel Shilovsky. -- Thanks, Steve ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <CAH2r5msNJSdS5Pq3+PY0Lndg0C22GR-27HNA8vzBVfT50x3uQA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: Mounting SMB2 fails with -EINVAL on 3.7-rc7 [not found] ` <CAH2r5msNJSdS5Pq3+PY0Lndg0C22GR-27HNA8vzBVfT50x3uQA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> @ 2012-11-28 13:49 ` Pavel Shilovsky [not found] ` <CAKywueSRRuCDJxDgnHURSGY9qAvc_kb4BuKMoMaxCbjh4UPrNg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Pavel Shilovsky @ 2012-11-28 13:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Steve French; +Cc: Suresh Jayaraman, linux-cifs 2012/11/27 Steve French <smfrench-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>: > I have a patch for 2.0 support that was in my for-next branch for a > little bit but I decided was too late for 3.7 Are your going to re-add it again for 3.8? (I think it's important to support Samba - my be we should backport it to v3.7 too during stable series) -- Best regards, Pavel Shilovsky. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <CAKywueSRRuCDJxDgnHURSGY9qAvc_kb4BuKMoMaxCbjh4UPrNg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: Mounting SMB2 fails with -EINVAL on 3.7-rc7 [not found] ` <CAKywueSRRuCDJxDgnHURSGY9qAvc_kb4BuKMoMaxCbjh4UPrNg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> @ 2012-11-28 16:08 ` Suresh Jayaraman [not found] ` <50B6370F.2060402-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Suresh Jayaraman @ 2012-11-28 16:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Pavel Shilovsky; +Cc: Steve French, linux-cifs On 11/28/2012 07:19 PM, Pavel Shilovsky wrote: > 2012/11/27 Steve French <smfrench-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>: >> I have a patch for 2.0 support that was in my for-next branch for a >> little bit but I decided was too late for 3.7 > > Are your going to re-add it again for 3.8? (I think it's important to > support Samba - my be we should backport it to v3.7 too during stable > series) > While I agree that it is quite important for smb client to work with Samba, I'm not sure whether this patch would meet the -stable criteria... -- Suresh Jayaraman ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <50B6370F.2060402-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: Mounting SMB2 fails with -EINVAL on 3.7-rc7 [not found] ` <50B6370F.2060402-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org> @ 2012-11-29 5:38 ` Steve French 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Steve French @ 2012-11-29 5:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Suresh Jayaraman; +Cc: Pavel Shilovsky, linux-cifs The patch for 2.02 dialect support was reviewed by Pavel and is now in cifs-2.6.git for next (destined for 3.8). On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org> wrote: > On 11/28/2012 07:19 PM, Pavel Shilovsky wrote: >> 2012/11/27 Steve French <smfrench-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>: >>> I have a patch for 2.0 support that was in my for-next branch for a >>> little bit but I decided was too late for 3.7 >> >> Are your going to re-add it again for 3.8? (I think it's important to >> support Samba - my be we should backport it to v3.7 too during stable >> series) >> > > While I agree that it is quite important for smb client to work with > Samba, I'm not sure whether this patch would meet the -stable criteria... > > -- > Suresh Jayaraman -- Thanks, Steve ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-11-29 5:38 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-11-27 9:21 Mounting SMB2 fails with -EINVAL on 3.7-rc7 Suresh Jayaraman
[not found] ` <50B48601.6070000-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-27 12:56 ` Pavel Shilovsky
[not found] ` <CAKywueT-Wi_gS8SNOQ+Ac-MNFNSuN_ni1BA8neQsy0836w6BvA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-27 13:00 ` Suresh Jayaraman
[not found] ` <50B4B972.8070604-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-27 13:21 ` Pavel Shilovsky
[not found] ` <CAKywueSm5K_H870mvQED02fqKoY8FTR=T+RhAo6hk3VzN3Jd4g-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-27 16:27 ` Steve French
[not found] ` <CAH2r5msNJSdS5Pq3+PY0Lndg0C22GR-27HNA8vzBVfT50x3uQA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-28 13:49 ` Pavel Shilovsky
[not found] ` <CAKywueSRRuCDJxDgnHURSGY9qAvc_kb4BuKMoMaxCbjh4UPrNg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-28 16:08 ` Suresh Jayaraman
[not found] ` <50B6370F.2060402-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-29 5:38 ` Steve French
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.