From: "Arend van Spriel" <arend@broadcom.com>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
backports@vger.kernel.org, alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com,
brudley@broadcom.com, rvossen@broadcom.com, frankyl@broadcom.com,
kanyan@broadcom.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
brcm80211-dev-list@broadcom.com, kyungmin.park@samsung.com,
s.nawrocki@samsung.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
srinidhi.kasagar@stericsson.com, linus.walleij@linaro.org,
"gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] drivers: convert struct spinlock to spinlock_t
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 09:38:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50B87082.3020604@broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1354221910-22493-1-git-send-email-mcgrof@do-not-panic.com>
On 11/29/2012 09:45 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com>
>
> Turns out a few drivers have strayed away from using the
> spinlock_t typedef and decided to use struct spinlock
> directly. This series converts these drivers to use
> spinlock_t. Each change has been compile tested with
> allmodconfig and sparse checked. Driver developers
> may want to look at the compile error output / sparse
> error report supplied in each commit log, in particular
> brcmfmac and i915, there are quite a few things that
> are not related to this change that the developers
> can clean up / fix.
So what is the rationale here. During mainlining our drivers we had to
remove all uses of 'typedef struct foo foo_t;'. The Linux CodingStyle
(chapter 5 Typedefs) is spending a number of lines explaining why.
So is spinlock_t an exception to this rule simply because the kernel
uses spinlock_t all over the place. Using Greg's favorite final email
remark:
Confused.
Gr. AvS
> Luis R. Rodriguez (6):
> ux500: convert struct spinlock to spinlock_t
> i915: convert struct spinlock to spinlock_t
> s5p-fimc: convert struct spinlock to spinlock_t
> s5p-jpeg: convert struct spinlock to spinlock_t
> brcmfmac: convert struct spinlock to spinlock_t
> ie6xx_wdt: convert struct spinlock to spinlock_t
>
> drivers/crypto/ux500/cryp/cryp.h | 4 ++--
> drivers/crypto/ux500/hash/hash_alg.h | 4 ++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 4 ++--
> drivers/media/platform/s5p-fimc/mipi-csis.c | 2 +-
> drivers/media/platform/s5p-jpeg/jpeg-core.h | 2 +-
> drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/fweh.h | 2 +-
> drivers/watchdog/ie6xx_wdt.c | 2 +-
> 7 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: arend@broadcom.com (Arend van Spriel)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/6] drivers: convert struct spinlock to spinlock_t
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 09:38:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50B87082.3020604@broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1354221910-22493-1-git-send-email-mcgrof@do-not-panic.com>
On 11/29/2012 09:45 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com>
>
> Turns out a few drivers have strayed away from using the
> spinlock_t typedef and decided to use struct spinlock
> directly. This series converts these drivers to use
> spinlock_t. Each change has been compile tested with
> allmodconfig and sparse checked. Driver developers
> may want to look at the compile error output / sparse
> error report supplied in each commit log, in particular
> brcmfmac and i915, there are quite a few things that
> are not related to this change that the developers
> can clean up / fix.
So what is the rationale here. During mainlining our drivers we had to
remove all uses of 'typedef struct foo foo_t;'. The Linux CodingStyle
(chapter 5 Typedefs) is spending a number of lines explaining why.
So is spinlock_t an exception to this rule simply because the kernel
uses spinlock_t all over the place. Using Greg's favorite final email
remark:
Confused.
Gr. AvS
> Luis R. Rodriguez (6):
> ux500: convert struct spinlock to spinlock_t
> i915: convert struct spinlock to spinlock_t
> s5p-fimc: convert struct spinlock to spinlock_t
> s5p-jpeg: convert struct spinlock to spinlock_t
> brcmfmac: convert struct spinlock to spinlock_t
> ie6xx_wdt: convert struct spinlock to spinlock_t
>
> drivers/crypto/ux500/cryp/cryp.h | 4 ++--
> drivers/crypto/ux500/hash/hash_alg.h | 4 ++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 4 ++--
> drivers/media/platform/s5p-fimc/mipi-csis.c | 2 +-
> drivers/media/platform/s5p-jpeg/jpeg-core.h | 2 +-
> drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/fweh.h | 2 +-
> drivers/watchdog/ie6xx_wdt.c | 2 +-
> 7 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-30 8:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-29 20:45 [PATCH 0/6] drivers: convert struct spinlock to spinlock_t Luis R. Rodriguez
2012-11-29 20:45 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2012-11-29 20:45 ` [PATCH 1/6] ux500: " Luis R. Rodriguez
2012-11-29 20:45 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2012-11-29 20:45 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2012-11-29 21:04 ` [PATCH] checkpatch: Warn when declaring "struct spinlock foo;" Joe Perches
2012-12-01 18:11 ` [PATCH 1/6] ux500: convert struct spinlock to spinlock_t Linus Walleij
2012-12-01 18:11 ` Linus Walleij
2012-11-29 20:45 ` [PATCH 2/6] i915: " Luis R. Rodriguez
2012-11-29 20:45 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2012-11-29 20:49 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-11-29 20:49 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-11-29 20:45 ` [PATCH 3/6] s5p-fimc: " Luis R. Rodriguez
2012-11-29 20:45 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2012-11-29 20:45 ` [PATCH 4/6] s5p-jpeg: " Luis R. Rodriguez
2012-11-29 20:45 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2012-11-29 20:45 ` [PATCH 5/6] brcmfmac: " Luis R. Rodriguez
2012-11-29 20:45 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2012-11-29 20:45 ` [PATCH 6/6] ie6xx_wdt: " Luis R. Rodriguez
2012-11-29 20:45 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2012-11-30 8:38 ` Arend van Spriel [this message]
2012-11-30 8:38 ` [PATCH 0/6] drivers: " Arend van Spriel
2012-11-30 19:18 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2012-11-30 19:18 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2012-11-30 20:25 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2012-11-30 20:25 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2012-11-30 20:25 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2012-11-30 21:21 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-11-30 21:21 ` Arend van Spriel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50B87082.3020604@broadcom.com \
--to=arend@broadcom.com \
--cc=alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com \
--cc=backports@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=brcm80211-dev-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=brudley@broadcom.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=frankyl@broadcom.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=kanyan@broadcom.com \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@do-not-panic.com \
--cc=rvossen@broadcom.com \
--cc=s.nawrocki@samsung.com \
--cc=srinidhi.kasagar@stericsson.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.