Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] leds: leds-pwm: Convert to use devm_get_pwm

[Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>]

Hi Bryan,

On 11/14/2012 02:14 AM, Bryan Wu wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 6:41 AM, Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> wrote:
>> Update the driver to use the new API for requesting pwm so we can take
>> advantage of the pwm_lookup table to find the correct pwm to be used for the
>> LED functionality.
>> If the devm_get_pwm fails we fall back to legacy mode to try to get the pwm.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c  | 19 ++++++-------------
>>  include/linux/leds_pwm.h |  2 +-
>>  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c b/drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c
>> index f2e44c7..c953c75 100644
>> --- a/drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c
>> @@ -67,12 +67,11 @@ static int led_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>                 cur_led = &pdata->leds[i];
>>                 led_dat = &leds_data[i];
>>
>> -               led_dat->pwm = pwm_request(cur_led->pwm_id,
>> -                               cur_led->name);
>> +               led_dat->pwm = devm_pwm_get(&pdev->dev, cur_led->name);
>>                 if (IS_ERR(led_dat->pwm)) {
>>                         ret = PTR_ERR(led_dat->pwm);
>> -                       dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to request PWM %d\n",
>> -                                       cur_led->pwm_id);
>> +                       dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to request PWM for %s\n",
>> +                               cur_led->name);
>>                         goto err;
>>                 }
>>
>> @@ -86,10 +85,8 @@ static int led_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>                 led_dat->cdev.flags |= LED_CORE_SUSPENDRESUME;
>>
>>                 ret = led_classdev_register(&pdev->dev, &led_dat->cdev);
>> -               if (ret < 0) {
>> -                       pwm_free(led_dat->pwm);
>> +               if (ret < 0)
>>                         goto err;
>> -               }
>>         }
>>
>>         platform_set_drvdata(pdev, leds_data);
>> @@ -98,10 +95,8 @@ static int led_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>
>>  err:
>>         if (i > 0) {
>> -               for (i = i - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
>> +               for (i = i - 1; i >= 0; i--)
>>                         led_classdev_unregister(&leds_data[i].cdev);
>> -                       pwm_free(leds_data[i].pwm);
>> -               }
>>         }
>>
>>         return ret;
>> @@ -115,10 +110,8 @@ static int __devexit led_pwm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>
>>         leds_data = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>>
>> -       for (i = 0; i < pdata->num_leds; i++) {
>> +       for (i = 0; i < pdata->num_leds; i++)
>>                 led_classdev_unregister(&leds_data[i].cdev);
>> -               pwm_free(leds_data[i].pwm);
>> -       }
>>
>>         return 0;
>>  }
>> diff --git a/include/linux/leds_pwm.h b/include/linux/leds_pwm.h
>> index 33a0711..a65e964 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/leds_pwm.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/leds_pwm.h
>> @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
>>  struct led_pwm {
>>         const char      *name;
>>         const char      *default_trigger;
>> -       unsigned        pwm_id;
>> +       unsigned        pwm_id __deprecated;
> 
> I suggest we remove this later, we can provide patches from this from
> platform data of board file. And I think this patch is good for me to
> merge, will do it soon.

I have marked the pwm_id as deprecated for now to allow one kernel cycle for
external (?) drivers to adopt. We can remove it for 3.9 I think.

I just checked linux-next today and this series is still not there. Do you
want me to resend it for you? I can rebase the patches on top of linux-next or
if you have preference on which tree should I use please let me know.

> 
> Thanks,
> -Bryan
> 
>>         u8              active_low;
>>         unsigned        max_brightness;
>>         unsigned        pwm_period_ns;
>> --
>> 1.8.0
>>


Thanks,
Péter