From: Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Jianguo Wu <wujianguo@huawei.com>
Cc: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, cmetcalf@tilera.com,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>, Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch v4 08/12] memory-hotplug: remove memmap of sparse-vmemmap
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 17:13:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50BDBEB7.3070807@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50BC0D2D.8040008@huawei.com>
Hi Wu,
Sorry to make noise here. Please see below. :)
On 12/03/2012 10:23 AM, Jianguo Wu wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Jianguo Wu<wujianguo@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu<jiang.liu@huawei.com>
> ---
> include/linux/mm.h | 1 +
> mm/sparse-vmemmap.c | 231 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> mm/sparse.c | 3 +-
> 3 files changed, 234 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> index 5657670..1f26af5 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -1642,6 +1642,7 @@ int vmemmap_populate(struct page *start_page, unsigned long pages, int node);
> void vmemmap_populate_print_last(void);
> void register_page_bootmem_memmap(unsigned long section_nr, struct page *map,
> unsigned long size);
> +void vmemmap_free(struct page *memmap, unsigned long nr_pages);
>
> enum mf_flags {
> MF_COUNT_INCREASED = 1<< 0,
> diff --git a/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c b/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c
> index 1b7e22a..748732d 100644
> --- a/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c
> +++ b/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,10 @@
> #include<asm/pgalloc.h>
> #include<asm/pgtable.h>
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
> +#include<asm/tlbflush.h>
> +#endif
> +
> /*
> * Allocate a block of memory to be used to back the virtual memory map
> * or to back the page tables that are used to create the mapping.
> @@ -224,3 +228,230 @@ void __init sparse_mem_maps_populate_node(struct page **map_map,
> vmemmap_buf_end = NULL;
> }
> }
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
> +
> +#define PAGE_INUSE 0xFD
> +
> +static void vmemmap_free_pages(struct page *page, int order)
> +{
> + struct zone *zone;
> + unsigned long magic;
> +
> + magic = (unsigned long) page->lru.next;
> + if (magic == SECTION_INFO || magic == MIX_SECTION_INFO) {
> + put_page_bootmem(page);
> +
> + zone = page_zone(page);
> + zone_span_writelock(zone);
> + zone->present_pages++;
> + zone_span_writeunlock(zone);
> + totalram_pages++;
Seems that we have different ways to handle pages allocated by bootmem
or by regular allocator. Is the checking way in [PATCH 09/12] available
here ?
+ /* bootmem page has reserved flag */
+ if (PageReserved(page)) {
......
+ }
If so, I think we can just merge these two functions.
> + } else
> + free_pages((unsigned long)page_address(page), order);
> +}
> +
> +static void free_pte_table(pmd_t *pmd)
> +{
> + pte_t *pte, *pte_start;
> + int i;
> +
> + pte_start = (pte_t *)pmd_page_vaddr(*pmd);
> + for (i = 0; i< PTRS_PER_PTE; i++) {
> + pte = pte_start + i;
> + if (pte_val(*pte))
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + /* free a pte talbe */
> + vmemmap_free_pages(pmd_page(*pmd), 0);
> + spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
> + pmd_clear(pmd);
> + spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
> +}
> +
> +static void free_pmd_table(pud_t *pud)
> +{
> + pmd_t *pmd, *pmd_start;
> + int i;
> +
> + pmd_start = (pmd_t *)pud_page_vaddr(*pud);
> + for (i = 0; i< PTRS_PER_PMD; i++) {
> + pmd = pmd_start + i;
> + if (pmd_val(*pmd))
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + /* free a pmd talbe */
> + vmemmap_free_pages(pud_page(*pud), 0);
> + spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
> + pud_clear(pud);
> + spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
> +}
> +
> +static void free_pud_table(pgd_t *pgd)
> +{
> + pud_t *pud, *pud_start;
> + int i;
> +
> + pud_start = (pud_t *)pgd_page_vaddr(*pgd);
> + for (i = 0; i< PTRS_PER_PUD; i++) {
> + pud = pud_start + i;
> + if (pud_val(*pud))
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + /* free a pud table */
> + vmemmap_free_pages(pgd_page(*pgd), 0);
> + spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
> + pgd_clear(pgd);
> + spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
> +}
All the free_xxx_table() are very similar to the functions in
[PATCH 09/12]. Could we reuse them anyway ?
> +
> +static int split_large_page(pte_t *kpte, unsigned long address, pte_t *pbase)
> +{
> + struct page *page = pmd_page(*(pmd_t *)kpte);
> + int i = 0;
> + unsigned long magic;
> + unsigned long section_nr;
> +
> + __split_large_page(kpte, address, pbase);
Is this patch going to replace [PATCH 08/12] ?
If so, __split_large_page() was added and exported in [PATCH 09/12],
then we should move it here, right ?
If not, free_map_bootmem() and __kfree_section_memmap() were changed in
[PATCH 08/12], and we need to handle this.
> + __flush_tlb_all();
> +
> + magic = (unsigned long) page->lru.next;
> + if (magic == SECTION_INFO) {
> + section_nr = pfn_to_section_nr(page_to_pfn(page));
> + while (i< PTRS_PER_PMD) {
> + page++;
> + i++;
> + get_page_bootmem(section_nr, page, SECTION_INFO);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void vmemmap_pte_remove(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end)
> +{
> + pte_t *pte;
> + unsigned long next;
> + void *page_addr;
> +
> + pte = pte_offset_kernel(pmd, addr);
> + for (; addr< end; pte++, addr += PAGE_SIZE) {
> + next = (addr + PAGE_SIZE)& PAGE_MASK;
> + if (next> end)
> + next = end;
> +
> + if (pte_none(*pte))
> + continue;
> + if (IS_ALIGNED(addr, PAGE_SIZE)&&
> + IS_ALIGNED(next, PAGE_SIZE)) {
> + vmemmap_free_pages(pte_page(*pte), 0);
> + spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
> + pte_clear(&init_mm, addr, pte);
> + spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
> + } else {
> + /*
> + * Removed page structs are filled with 0xFD.
> + */
> + memset((void *)addr, PAGE_INUSE, next - addr);
> + page_addr = page_address(pte_page(*pte));
> +
> + if (!memchr_inv(page_addr, PAGE_INUSE, PAGE_SIZE)) {
> + spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
> + pte_clear(&init_mm, addr, pte);
> + spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
> + }
> + }
> + }
> +
> + free_pte_table(pmd);
> + __flush_tlb_all();
> +}
> +
> +static void vmemmap_pmd_remove(pud_t *pud, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end)
> +{
> + unsigned long next;
> + pmd_t *pmd;
> +
> + pmd = pmd_offset(pud, addr);
> + for (; addr< end; addr = next, pmd++) {
> + next = pmd_addr_end(addr, end);
> + if (pmd_none(*pmd))
> + continue;
> +
> + if (cpu_has_pse) {
> + unsigned long pte_base;
> +
> + if (IS_ALIGNED(addr, PMD_SIZE)&&
> + IS_ALIGNED(next, PMD_SIZE)) {
> + vmemmap_free_pages(pmd_page(*pmd),
> + get_order(PMD_SIZE));
> + spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
> + pmd_clear(pmd);
> + spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * We use 2M page, but we need to remove part of them,
> + * so split 2M page to 4K page.
> + */
> + pte_base = get_zeroed_page(GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOTRACK);
> + if (!pte_base) {
> + WARN_ON(1);
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> + split_large_page((pte_t *)pmd, addr, (pte_t *)pte_base);
> + __flush_tlb_all();
> +
> + spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
> + pmd_populate_kernel(&init_mm, pmd, (pte_t *)pte_base);
> + spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
> + }
> +
> + vmemmap_pte_remove(pmd, addr, next);
> + }
> +
> + free_pmd_table(pud);
> + __flush_tlb_all();
> +}
> +
> +static void vmemmap_pud_remove(pgd_t *pgd, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end)
> +{
> + unsigned long next;
> + pud_t *pud;
> +
> + pud = pud_offset(pgd, addr);
> + for (; addr< end; addr = next, pud++) {
> + next = pud_addr_end(addr, end);
> + if (pud_none(*pud))
> + continue;
> +
> + vmemmap_pmd_remove(pud, addr, next);
> + }
> +
> + free_pud_table(pgd);
> + __flush_tlb_all();
> +}
> +
> +void vmemmap_free(struct page *memmap, unsigned long nr_pages)
> +{
> + unsigned long addr = (unsigned long)memmap;
> + unsigned long end = (unsigned long)(memmap + nr_pages);
> + unsigned long next;
> +
> + for (; addr< end; addr = next) {
> + pgd_t *pgd = pgd_offset_k(addr);
> +
> + next = pgd_addr_end(addr, end);
> + if (!pgd_present(*pgd))
> + continue;
> +
> + vmemmap_pud_remove(pgd, addr, next);
> + sync_global_pgds(addr, next - 1);
> + }
> +}
> +#endif
> diff --git a/mm/sparse.c b/mm/sparse.c
> index fac95f2..4060229 100644
> --- a/mm/sparse.c
> +++ b/mm/sparse.c
> @@ -615,10 +615,11 @@ static inline struct page *kmalloc_section_memmap(unsigned long pnum, int nid,
> }
> static void __kfree_section_memmap(struct page *memmap, unsigned long nr_pages)
> {
> - return; /* XXX: Not implemented yet */
> + vmemmap_free(memmap, nr_pages);
> }
> static void free_map_bootmem(struct page *page, unsigned long nr_pages)
In the latest kernel, this line was:
static void free_map_bootmem(struct page *memmap, unsigned long nr_pages)
> {
> + vmemmap_free(page, nr_pages);
> }
> #else
> static struct page *__kmalloc_section_memmap(unsigned long nr_pages)
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Jianguo Wu <wujianguo@huawei.com>
Cc: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, cmetcalf@tilera.com,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>, Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch v4 08/12] memory-hotplug: remove memmap of sparse-vmemmap
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 09:13:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50BDBEB7.3070807@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50BC0D2D.8040008@huawei.com>
Hi Wu,
Sorry to make noise here. Please see below. :)
On 12/03/2012 10:23 AM, Jianguo Wu wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Jianguo Wu<wujianguo@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu<jiang.liu@huawei.com>
> ---
> include/linux/mm.h | 1 +
> mm/sparse-vmemmap.c | 231 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> mm/sparse.c | 3 +-
> 3 files changed, 234 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> index 5657670..1f26af5 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -1642,6 +1642,7 @@ int vmemmap_populate(struct page *start_page, unsigned long pages, int node);
> void vmemmap_populate_print_last(void);
> void register_page_bootmem_memmap(unsigned long section_nr, struct page *map,
> unsigned long size);
> +void vmemmap_free(struct page *memmap, unsigned long nr_pages);
>
> enum mf_flags {
> MF_COUNT_INCREASED = 1<< 0,
> diff --git a/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c b/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c
> index 1b7e22a..748732d 100644
> --- a/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c
> +++ b/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,10 @@
> #include<asm/pgalloc.h>
> #include<asm/pgtable.h>
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
> +#include<asm/tlbflush.h>
> +#endif
> +
> /*
> * Allocate a block of memory to be used to back the virtual memory map
> * or to back the page tables that are used to create the mapping.
> @@ -224,3 +228,230 @@ void __init sparse_mem_maps_populate_node(struct page **map_map,
> vmemmap_buf_end = NULL;
> }
> }
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
> +
> +#define PAGE_INUSE 0xFD
> +
> +static void vmemmap_free_pages(struct page *page, int order)
> +{
> + struct zone *zone;
> + unsigned long magic;
> +
> + magic = (unsigned long) page->lru.next;
> + if (magic = SECTION_INFO || magic = MIX_SECTION_INFO) {
> + put_page_bootmem(page);
> +
> + zone = page_zone(page);
> + zone_span_writelock(zone);
> + zone->present_pages++;
> + zone_span_writeunlock(zone);
> + totalram_pages++;
Seems that we have different ways to handle pages allocated by bootmem
or by regular allocator. Is the checking way in [PATCH 09/12] available
here ?
+ /* bootmem page has reserved flag */
+ if (PageReserved(page)) {
......
+ }
If so, I think we can just merge these two functions.
> + } else
> + free_pages((unsigned long)page_address(page), order);
> +}
> +
> +static void free_pte_table(pmd_t *pmd)
> +{
> + pte_t *pte, *pte_start;
> + int i;
> +
> + pte_start = (pte_t *)pmd_page_vaddr(*pmd);
> + for (i = 0; i< PTRS_PER_PTE; i++) {
> + pte = pte_start + i;
> + if (pte_val(*pte))
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + /* free a pte talbe */
> + vmemmap_free_pages(pmd_page(*pmd), 0);
> + spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
> + pmd_clear(pmd);
> + spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
> +}
> +
> +static void free_pmd_table(pud_t *pud)
> +{
> + pmd_t *pmd, *pmd_start;
> + int i;
> +
> + pmd_start = (pmd_t *)pud_page_vaddr(*pud);
> + for (i = 0; i< PTRS_PER_PMD; i++) {
> + pmd = pmd_start + i;
> + if (pmd_val(*pmd))
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + /* free a pmd talbe */
> + vmemmap_free_pages(pud_page(*pud), 0);
> + spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
> + pud_clear(pud);
> + spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
> +}
> +
> +static void free_pud_table(pgd_t *pgd)
> +{
> + pud_t *pud, *pud_start;
> + int i;
> +
> + pud_start = (pud_t *)pgd_page_vaddr(*pgd);
> + for (i = 0; i< PTRS_PER_PUD; i++) {
> + pud = pud_start + i;
> + if (pud_val(*pud))
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + /* free a pud table */
> + vmemmap_free_pages(pgd_page(*pgd), 0);
> + spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
> + pgd_clear(pgd);
> + spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
> +}
All the free_xxx_table() are very similar to the functions in
[PATCH 09/12]. Could we reuse them anyway ?
> +
> +static int split_large_page(pte_t *kpte, unsigned long address, pte_t *pbase)
> +{
> + struct page *page = pmd_page(*(pmd_t *)kpte);
> + int i = 0;
> + unsigned long magic;
> + unsigned long section_nr;
> +
> + __split_large_page(kpte, address, pbase);
Is this patch going to replace [PATCH 08/12] ?
If so, __split_large_page() was added and exported in [PATCH 09/12],
then we should move it here, right ?
If not, free_map_bootmem() and __kfree_section_memmap() were changed in
[PATCH 08/12], and we need to handle this.
> + __flush_tlb_all();
> +
> + magic = (unsigned long) page->lru.next;
> + if (magic = SECTION_INFO) {
> + section_nr = pfn_to_section_nr(page_to_pfn(page));
> + while (i< PTRS_PER_PMD) {
> + page++;
> + i++;
> + get_page_bootmem(section_nr, page, SECTION_INFO);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void vmemmap_pte_remove(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end)
> +{
> + pte_t *pte;
> + unsigned long next;
> + void *page_addr;
> +
> + pte = pte_offset_kernel(pmd, addr);
> + for (; addr< end; pte++, addr += PAGE_SIZE) {
> + next = (addr + PAGE_SIZE)& PAGE_MASK;
> + if (next> end)
> + next = end;
> +
> + if (pte_none(*pte))
> + continue;
> + if (IS_ALIGNED(addr, PAGE_SIZE)&&
> + IS_ALIGNED(next, PAGE_SIZE)) {
> + vmemmap_free_pages(pte_page(*pte), 0);
> + spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
> + pte_clear(&init_mm, addr, pte);
> + spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
> + } else {
> + /*
> + * Removed page structs are filled with 0xFD.
> + */
> + memset((void *)addr, PAGE_INUSE, next - addr);
> + page_addr = page_address(pte_page(*pte));
> +
> + if (!memchr_inv(page_addr, PAGE_INUSE, PAGE_SIZE)) {
> + spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
> + pte_clear(&init_mm, addr, pte);
> + spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
> + }
> + }
> + }
> +
> + free_pte_table(pmd);
> + __flush_tlb_all();
> +}
> +
> +static void vmemmap_pmd_remove(pud_t *pud, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end)
> +{
> + unsigned long next;
> + pmd_t *pmd;
> +
> + pmd = pmd_offset(pud, addr);
> + for (; addr< end; addr = next, pmd++) {
> + next = pmd_addr_end(addr, end);
> + if (pmd_none(*pmd))
> + continue;
> +
> + if (cpu_has_pse) {
> + unsigned long pte_base;
> +
> + if (IS_ALIGNED(addr, PMD_SIZE)&&
> + IS_ALIGNED(next, PMD_SIZE)) {
> + vmemmap_free_pages(pmd_page(*pmd),
> + get_order(PMD_SIZE));
> + spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
> + pmd_clear(pmd);
> + spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * We use 2M page, but we need to remove part of them,
> + * so split 2M page to 4K page.
> + */
> + pte_base = get_zeroed_page(GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOTRACK);
> + if (!pte_base) {
> + WARN_ON(1);
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> + split_large_page((pte_t *)pmd, addr, (pte_t *)pte_base);
> + __flush_tlb_all();
> +
> + spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
> + pmd_populate_kernel(&init_mm, pmd, (pte_t *)pte_base);
> + spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
> + }
> +
> + vmemmap_pte_remove(pmd, addr, next);
> + }
> +
> + free_pmd_table(pud);
> + __flush_tlb_all();
> +}
> +
> +static void vmemmap_pud_remove(pgd_t *pgd, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end)
> +{
> + unsigned long next;
> + pud_t *pud;
> +
> + pud = pud_offset(pgd, addr);
> + for (; addr< end; addr = next, pud++) {
> + next = pud_addr_end(addr, end);
> + if (pud_none(*pud))
> + continue;
> +
> + vmemmap_pmd_remove(pud, addr, next);
> + }
> +
> + free_pud_table(pgd);
> + __flush_tlb_all();
> +}
> +
> +void vmemmap_free(struct page *memmap, unsigned long nr_pages)
> +{
> + unsigned long addr = (unsigned long)memmap;
> + unsigned long end = (unsigned long)(memmap + nr_pages);
> + unsigned long next;
> +
> + for (; addr< end; addr = next) {
> + pgd_t *pgd = pgd_offset_k(addr);
> +
> + next = pgd_addr_end(addr, end);
> + if (!pgd_present(*pgd))
> + continue;
> +
> + vmemmap_pud_remove(pgd, addr, next);
> + sync_global_pgds(addr, next - 1);
> + }
> +}
> +#endif
> diff --git a/mm/sparse.c b/mm/sparse.c
> index fac95f2..4060229 100644
> --- a/mm/sparse.c
> +++ b/mm/sparse.c
> @@ -615,10 +615,11 @@ static inline struct page *kmalloc_section_memmap(unsigned long pnum, int nid,
> }
> static void __kfree_section_memmap(struct page *memmap, unsigned long nr_pages)
> {
> - return; /* XXX: Not implemented yet */
> + vmemmap_free(memmap, nr_pages);
> }
> static void free_map_bootmem(struct page *page, unsigned long nr_pages)
In the latest kernel, this line was:
static void free_map_bootmem(struct page *memmap, unsigned long nr_pages)
> {
> + vmemmap_free(page, nr_pages);
> }
> #else
> static struct page *__kmalloc_section_memmap(unsigned long nr_pages)
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Jianguo Wu <wujianguo@huawei.com>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
cmetcalf@tilera.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>,
paulus@samba.org, Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch v4 08/12] memory-hotplug: remove memmap of sparse-vmemmap
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 17:13:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50BDBEB7.3070807@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50BC0D2D.8040008@huawei.com>
Hi Wu,
Sorry to make noise here. Please see below. :)
On 12/03/2012 10:23 AM, Jianguo Wu wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Jianguo Wu<wujianguo@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu<jiang.liu@huawei.com>
> ---
> include/linux/mm.h | 1 +
> mm/sparse-vmemmap.c | 231 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> mm/sparse.c | 3 +-
> 3 files changed, 234 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> index 5657670..1f26af5 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -1642,6 +1642,7 @@ int vmemmap_populate(struct page *start_page, unsigned long pages, int node);
> void vmemmap_populate_print_last(void);
> void register_page_bootmem_memmap(unsigned long section_nr, struct page *map,
> unsigned long size);
> +void vmemmap_free(struct page *memmap, unsigned long nr_pages);
>
> enum mf_flags {
> MF_COUNT_INCREASED = 1<< 0,
> diff --git a/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c b/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c
> index 1b7e22a..748732d 100644
> --- a/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c
> +++ b/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,10 @@
> #include<asm/pgalloc.h>
> #include<asm/pgtable.h>
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
> +#include<asm/tlbflush.h>
> +#endif
> +
> /*
> * Allocate a block of memory to be used to back the virtual memory map
> * or to back the page tables that are used to create the mapping.
> @@ -224,3 +228,230 @@ void __init sparse_mem_maps_populate_node(struct page **map_map,
> vmemmap_buf_end = NULL;
> }
> }
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
> +
> +#define PAGE_INUSE 0xFD
> +
> +static void vmemmap_free_pages(struct page *page, int order)
> +{
> + struct zone *zone;
> + unsigned long magic;
> +
> + magic = (unsigned long) page->lru.next;
> + if (magic == SECTION_INFO || magic == MIX_SECTION_INFO) {
> + put_page_bootmem(page);
> +
> + zone = page_zone(page);
> + zone_span_writelock(zone);
> + zone->present_pages++;
> + zone_span_writeunlock(zone);
> + totalram_pages++;
Seems that we have different ways to handle pages allocated by bootmem
or by regular allocator. Is the checking way in [PATCH 09/12] available
here ?
+ /* bootmem page has reserved flag */
+ if (PageReserved(page)) {
......
+ }
If so, I think we can just merge these two functions.
> + } else
> + free_pages((unsigned long)page_address(page), order);
> +}
> +
> +static void free_pte_table(pmd_t *pmd)
> +{
> + pte_t *pte, *pte_start;
> + int i;
> +
> + pte_start = (pte_t *)pmd_page_vaddr(*pmd);
> + for (i = 0; i< PTRS_PER_PTE; i++) {
> + pte = pte_start + i;
> + if (pte_val(*pte))
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + /* free a pte talbe */
> + vmemmap_free_pages(pmd_page(*pmd), 0);
> + spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
> + pmd_clear(pmd);
> + spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
> +}
> +
> +static void free_pmd_table(pud_t *pud)
> +{
> + pmd_t *pmd, *pmd_start;
> + int i;
> +
> + pmd_start = (pmd_t *)pud_page_vaddr(*pud);
> + for (i = 0; i< PTRS_PER_PMD; i++) {
> + pmd = pmd_start + i;
> + if (pmd_val(*pmd))
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + /* free a pmd talbe */
> + vmemmap_free_pages(pud_page(*pud), 0);
> + spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
> + pud_clear(pud);
> + spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
> +}
> +
> +static void free_pud_table(pgd_t *pgd)
> +{
> + pud_t *pud, *pud_start;
> + int i;
> +
> + pud_start = (pud_t *)pgd_page_vaddr(*pgd);
> + for (i = 0; i< PTRS_PER_PUD; i++) {
> + pud = pud_start + i;
> + if (pud_val(*pud))
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + /* free a pud table */
> + vmemmap_free_pages(pgd_page(*pgd), 0);
> + spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
> + pgd_clear(pgd);
> + spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
> +}
All the free_xxx_table() are very similar to the functions in
[PATCH 09/12]. Could we reuse them anyway ?
> +
> +static int split_large_page(pte_t *kpte, unsigned long address, pte_t *pbase)
> +{
> + struct page *page = pmd_page(*(pmd_t *)kpte);
> + int i = 0;
> + unsigned long magic;
> + unsigned long section_nr;
> +
> + __split_large_page(kpte, address, pbase);
Is this patch going to replace [PATCH 08/12] ?
If so, __split_large_page() was added and exported in [PATCH 09/12],
then we should move it here, right ?
If not, free_map_bootmem() and __kfree_section_memmap() were changed in
[PATCH 08/12], and we need to handle this.
> + __flush_tlb_all();
> +
> + magic = (unsigned long) page->lru.next;
> + if (magic == SECTION_INFO) {
> + section_nr = pfn_to_section_nr(page_to_pfn(page));
> + while (i< PTRS_PER_PMD) {
> + page++;
> + i++;
> + get_page_bootmem(section_nr, page, SECTION_INFO);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void vmemmap_pte_remove(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end)
> +{
> + pte_t *pte;
> + unsigned long next;
> + void *page_addr;
> +
> + pte = pte_offset_kernel(pmd, addr);
> + for (; addr< end; pte++, addr += PAGE_SIZE) {
> + next = (addr + PAGE_SIZE)& PAGE_MASK;
> + if (next> end)
> + next = end;
> +
> + if (pte_none(*pte))
> + continue;
> + if (IS_ALIGNED(addr, PAGE_SIZE)&&
> + IS_ALIGNED(next, PAGE_SIZE)) {
> + vmemmap_free_pages(pte_page(*pte), 0);
> + spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
> + pte_clear(&init_mm, addr, pte);
> + spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
> + } else {
> + /*
> + * Removed page structs are filled with 0xFD.
> + */
> + memset((void *)addr, PAGE_INUSE, next - addr);
> + page_addr = page_address(pte_page(*pte));
> +
> + if (!memchr_inv(page_addr, PAGE_INUSE, PAGE_SIZE)) {
> + spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
> + pte_clear(&init_mm, addr, pte);
> + spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
> + }
> + }
> + }
> +
> + free_pte_table(pmd);
> + __flush_tlb_all();
> +}
> +
> +static void vmemmap_pmd_remove(pud_t *pud, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end)
> +{
> + unsigned long next;
> + pmd_t *pmd;
> +
> + pmd = pmd_offset(pud, addr);
> + for (; addr< end; addr = next, pmd++) {
> + next = pmd_addr_end(addr, end);
> + if (pmd_none(*pmd))
> + continue;
> +
> + if (cpu_has_pse) {
> + unsigned long pte_base;
> +
> + if (IS_ALIGNED(addr, PMD_SIZE)&&
> + IS_ALIGNED(next, PMD_SIZE)) {
> + vmemmap_free_pages(pmd_page(*pmd),
> + get_order(PMD_SIZE));
> + spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
> + pmd_clear(pmd);
> + spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * We use 2M page, but we need to remove part of them,
> + * so split 2M page to 4K page.
> + */
> + pte_base = get_zeroed_page(GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOTRACK);
> + if (!pte_base) {
> + WARN_ON(1);
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> + split_large_page((pte_t *)pmd, addr, (pte_t *)pte_base);
> + __flush_tlb_all();
> +
> + spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
> + pmd_populate_kernel(&init_mm, pmd, (pte_t *)pte_base);
> + spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
> + }
> +
> + vmemmap_pte_remove(pmd, addr, next);
> + }
> +
> + free_pmd_table(pud);
> + __flush_tlb_all();
> +}
> +
> +static void vmemmap_pud_remove(pgd_t *pgd, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end)
> +{
> + unsigned long next;
> + pud_t *pud;
> +
> + pud = pud_offset(pgd, addr);
> + for (; addr< end; addr = next, pud++) {
> + next = pud_addr_end(addr, end);
> + if (pud_none(*pud))
> + continue;
> +
> + vmemmap_pmd_remove(pud, addr, next);
> + }
> +
> + free_pud_table(pgd);
> + __flush_tlb_all();
> +}
> +
> +void vmemmap_free(struct page *memmap, unsigned long nr_pages)
> +{
> + unsigned long addr = (unsigned long)memmap;
> + unsigned long end = (unsigned long)(memmap + nr_pages);
> + unsigned long next;
> +
> + for (; addr< end; addr = next) {
> + pgd_t *pgd = pgd_offset_k(addr);
> +
> + next = pgd_addr_end(addr, end);
> + if (!pgd_present(*pgd))
> + continue;
> +
> + vmemmap_pud_remove(pgd, addr, next);
> + sync_global_pgds(addr, next - 1);
> + }
> +}
> +#endif
> diff --git a/mm/sparse.c b/mm/sparse.c
> index fac95f2..4060229 100644
> --- a/mm/sparse.c
> +++ b/mm/sparse.c
> @@ -615,10 +615,11 @@ static inline struct page *kmalloc_section_memmap(unsigned long pnum, int nid,
> }
> static void __kfree_section_memmap(struct page *memmap, unsigned long nr_pages)
> {
> - return; /* XXX: Not implemented yet */
> + vmemmap_free(memmap, nr_pages);
> }
> static void free_map_bootmem(struct page *page, unsigned long nr_pages)
In the latest kernel, this line was:
static void free_map_bootmem(struct page *memmap, unsigned long nr_pages)
> {
> + vmemmap_free(page, nr_pages);
> }
> #else
> static struct page *__kmalloc_section_memmap(unsigned long nr_pages)
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Jianguo Wu <wujianguo@huawei.com>
Cc: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, cmetcalf@tilera.com,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>, Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch v4 08/12] memory-hotplug: remove memmap of sparse-vmemmap
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 17:13:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50BDBEB7.3070807@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50BC0D2D.8040008@huawei.com>
Hi Wu,
Sorry to make noise here. Please see below. :)
On 12/03/2012 10:23 AM, Jianguo Wu wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Jianguo Wu<wujianguo@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu<jiang.liu@huawei.com>
> ---
> include/linux/mm.h | 1 +
> mm/sparse-vmemmap.c | 231 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> mm/sparse.c | 3 +-
> 3 files changed, 234 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> index 5657670..1f26af5 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -1642,6 +1642,7 @@ int vmemmap_populate(struct page *start_page, unsigned long pages, int node);
> void vmemmap_populate_print_last(void);
> void register_page_bootmem_memmap(unsigned long section_nr, struct page *map,
> unsigned long size);
> +void vmemmap_free(struct page *memmap, unsigned long nr_pages);
>
> enum mf_flags {
> MF_COUNT_INCREASED = 1<< 0,
> diff --git a/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c b/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c
> index 1b7e22a..748732d 100644
> --- a/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c
> +++ b/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,10 @@
> #include<asm/pgalloc.h>
> #include<asm/pgtable.h>
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
> +#include<asm/tlbflush.h>
> +#endif
> +
> /*
> * Allocate a block of memory to be used to back the virtual memory map
> * or to back the page tables that are used to create the mapping.
> @@ -224,3 +228,230 @@ void __init sparse_mem_maps_populate_node(struct page **map_map,
> vmemmap_buf_end = NULL;
> }
> }
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
> +
> +#define PAGE_INUSE 0xFD
> +
> +static void vmemmap_free_pages(struct page *page, int order)
> +{
> + struct zone *zone;
> + unsigned long magic;
> +
> + magic = (unsigned long) page->lru.next;
> + if (magic == SECTION_INFO || magic == MIX_SECTION_INFO) {
> + put_page_bootmem(page);
> +
> + zone = page_zone(page);
> + zone_span_writelock(zone);
> + zone->present_pages++;
> + zone_span_writeunlock(zone);
> + totalram_pages++;
Seems that we have different ways to handle pages allocated by bootmem
or by regular allocator. Is the checking way in [PATCH 09/12] available
here ?
+ /* bootmem page has reserved flag */
+ if (PageReserved(page)) {
......
+ }
If so, I think we can just merge these two functions.
> + } else
> + free_pages((unsigned long)page_address(page), order);
> +}
> +
> +static void free_pte_table(pmd_t *pmd)
> +{
> + pte_t *pte, *pte_start;
> + int i;
> +
> + pte_start = (pte_t *)pmd_page_vaddr(*pmd);
> + for (i = 0; i< PTRS_PER_PTE; i++) {
> + pte = pte_start + i;
> + if (pte_val(*pte))
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + /* free a pte talbe */
> + vmemmap_free_pages(pmd_page(*pmd), 0);
> + spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
> + pmd_clear(pmd);
> + spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
> +}
> +
> +static void free_pmd_table(pud_t *pud)
> +{
> + pmd_t *pmd, *pmd_start;
> + int i;
> +
> + pmd_start = (pmd_t *)pud_page_vaddr(*pud);
> + for (i = 0; i< PTRS_PER_PMD; i++) {
> + pmd = pmd_start + i;
> + if (pmd_val(*pmd))
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + /* free a pmd talbe */
> + vmemmap_free_pages(pud_page(*pud), 0);
> + spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
> + pud_clear(pud);
> + spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
> +}
> +
> +static void free_pud_table(pgd_t *pgd)
> +{
> + pud_t *pud, *pud_start;
> + int i;
> +
> + pud_start = (pud_t *)pgd_page_vaddr(*pgd);
> + for (i = 0; i< PTRS_PER_PUD; i++) {
> + pud = pud_start + i;
> + if (pud_val(*pud))
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + /* free a pud table */
> + vmemmap_free_pages(pgd_page(*pgd), 0);
> + spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
> + pgd_clear(pgd);
> + spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
> +}
All the free_xxx_table() are very similar to the functions in
[PATCH 09/12]. Could we reuse them anyway ?
> +
> +static int split_large_page(pte_t *kpte, unsigned long address, pte_t *pbase)
> +{
> + struct page *page = pmd_page(*(pmd_t *)kpte);
> + int i = 0;
> + unsigned long magic;
> + unsigned long section_nr;
> +
> + __split_large_page(kpte, address, pbase);
Is this patch going to replace [PATCH 08/12] ?
If so, __split_large_page() was added and exported in [PATCH 09/12],
then we should move it here, right ?
If not, free_map_bootmem() and __kfree_section_memmap() were changed in
[PATCH 08/12], and we need to handle this.
> + __flush_tlb_all();
> +
> + magic = (unsigned long) page->lru.next;
> + if (magic == SECTION_INFO) {
> + section_nr = pfn_to_section_nr(page_to_pfn(page));
> + while (i< PTRS_PER_PMD) {
> + page++;
> + i++;
> + get_page_bootmem(section_nr, page, SECTION_INFO);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void vmemmap_pte_remove(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end)
> +{
> + pte_t *pte;
> + unsigned long next;
> + void *page_addr;
> +
> + pte = pte_offset_kernel(pmd, addr);
> + for (; addr< end; pte++, addr += PAGE_SIZE) {
> + next = (addr + PAGE_SIZE)& PAGE_MASK;
> + if (next> end)
> + next = end;
> +
> + if (pte_none(*pte))
> + continue;
> + if (IS_ALIGNED(addr, PAGE_SIZE)&&
> + IS_ALIGNED(next, PAGE_SIZE)) {
> + vmemmap_free_pages(pte_page(*pte), 0);
> + spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
> + pte_clear(&init_mm, addr, pte);
> + spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
> + } else {
> + /*
> + * Removed page structs are filled with 0xFD.
> + */
> + memset((void *)addr, PAGE_INUSE, next - addr);
> + page_addr = page_address(pte_page(*pte));
> +
> + if (!memchr_inv(page_addr, PAGE_INUSE, PAGE_SIZE)) {
> + spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
> + pte_clear(&init_mm, addr, pte);
> + spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
> + }
> + }
> + }
> +
> + free_pte_table(pmd);
> + __flush_tlb_all();
> +}
> +
> +static void vmemmap_pmd_remove(pud_t *pud, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end)
> +{
> + unsigned long next;
> + pmd_t *pmd;
> +
> + pmd = pmd_offset(pud, addr);
> + for (; addr< end; addr = next, pmd++) {
> + next = pmd_addr_end(addr, end);
> + if (pmd_none(*pmd))
> + continue;
> +
> + if (cpu_has_pse) {
> + unsigned long pte_base;
> +
> + if (IS_ALIGNED(addr, PMD_SIZE)&&
> + IS_ALIGNED(next, PMD_SIZE)) {
> + vmemmap_free_pages(pmd_page(*pmd),
> + get_order(PMD_SIZE));
> + spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
> + pmd_clear(pmd);
> + spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * We use 2M page, but we need to remove part of them,
> + * so split 2M page to 4K page.
> + */
> + pte_base = get_zeroed_page(GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOTRACK);
> + if (!pte_base) {
> + WARN_ON(1);
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> + split_large_page((pte_t *)pmd, addr, (pte_t *)pte_base);
> + __flush_tlb_all();
> +
> + spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
> + pmd_populate_kernel(&init_mm, pmd, (pte_t *)pte_base);
> + spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
> + }
> +
> + vmemmap_pte_remove(pmd, addr, next);
> + }
> +
> + free_pmd_table(pud);
> + __flush_tlb_all();
> +}
> +
> +static void vmemmap_pud_remove(pgd_t *pgd, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end)
> +{
> + unsigned long next;
> + pud_t *pud;
> +
> + pud = pud_offset(pgd, addr);
> + for (; addr< end; addr = next, pud++) {
> + next = pud_addr_end(addr, end);
> + if (pud_none(*pud))
> + continue;
> +
> + vmemmap_pmd_remove(pud, addr, next);
> + }
> +
> + free_pud_table(pgd);
> + __flush_tlb_all();
> +}
> +
> +void vmemmap_free(struct page *memmap, unsigned long nr_pages)
> +{
> + unsigned long addr = (unsigned long)memmap;
> + unsigned long end = (unsigned long)(memmap + nr_pages);
> + unsigned long next;
> +
> + for (; addr< end; addr = next) {
> + pgd_t *pgd = pgd_offset_k(addr);
> +
> + next = pgd_addr_end(addr, end);
> + if (!pgd_present(*pgd))
> + continue;
> +
> + vmemmap_pud_remove(pgd, addr, next);
> + sync_global_pgds(addr, next - 1);
> + }
> +}
> +#endif
> diff --git a/mm/sparse.c b/mm/sparse.c
> index fac95f2..4060229 100644
> --- a/mm/sparse.c
> +++ b/mm/sparse.c
> @@ -615,10 +615,11 @@ static inline struct page *kmalloc_section_memmap(unsigned long pnum, int nid,
> }
> static void __kfree_section_memmap(struct page *memmap, unsigned long nr_pages)
> {
> - return; /* XXX: Not implemented yet */
> + vmemmap_free(memmap, nr_pages);
> }
> static void free_map_bootmem(struct page *page, unsigned long nr_pages)
In the latest kernel, this line was:
static void free_map_bootmem(struct page *memmap, unsigned long nr_pages)
> {
> + vmemmap_free(page, nr_pages);
> }
> #else
> static struct page *__kmalloc_section_memmap(unsigned long nr_pages)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-04 9:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 176+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-27 10:00 [Patch v4 00/12] memory-hotplug: hot-remove physical memory Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00 ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00 ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00 ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 9:58 ` [Patch v4 01/12] memory-hotplug: try to offline the memory twice to avoid dependence Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00 ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00 ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00 ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00 ` Wen Congyang
2012-12-04 9:17 ` Tang Chen
2012-12-04 9:17 ` Tang Chen
2012-12-04 9:17 ` Tang Chen
2012-12-04 9:17 ` Tang Chen
2012-11-27 9:58 ` [Patch v4 05/12] memory-hotplug: introduce new function arch_remove_memory() for removing page table Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00 ` [Patch v4 05/12] memory-hotplug: introduce new function arch_remove_memory() for removing page table depends on architecture Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00 ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00 ` [Patch v4 05/12] memory-hotplug: introduce new function arch_remove_memory() for removing page table Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00 ` [Patch v4 05/12] memory-hotplug: introduce new function arch_remove_memory() for removing page table depends on architecture Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 9:59 ` [Patch v4 05/12] memory-hotplug: introduce new function arch_remove_memory() for removing page table Wen Congyang
2012-12-04 9:30 ` [Patch v4 05/12] memory-hotplug: introduce new function arch_remove_memory() for removing page table depends on architecture Tang Chen
2012-12-04 9:30 ` Tang Chen
2012-12-04 9:30 ` Tang Chen
2012-12-04 9:30 ` [Patch v4 05/12] memory-hotplug: introduce new function arch_remove_memory() for removing page t Tang Chen
2012-11-27 9:59 ` [Patch v4 12/12] memory-hotplug: free node_data when a node is offlined Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00 ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00 ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00 ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 9:59 ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 9:59 ` Wen Congyang
2012-12-04 10:10 ` Tang Chen
2012-12-04 10:10 ` Tang Chen
2012-12-04 10:10 ` Tang Chen
2012-12-04 10:10 ` Tang Chen
2012-11-27 9:59 ` [Patch v4 08/12] memory-hotplug: remove memmap of sparse-vmemmap Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00 ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00 ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00 ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00 ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-28 9:40 ` Jianguo Wu
2012-11-28 9:40 ` Jianguo Wu
2012-11-28 9:40 ` Jianguo Wu
2012-11-28 9:40 ` Jianguo Wu
2012-11-28 9:40 ` Jianguo Wu
2012-11-30 1:45 ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-30 1:45 ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-30 1:45 ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-30 1:45 ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-30 2:47 ` Jianguo Wu
2012-11-30 2:47 ` Jianguo Wu
2012-11-30 2:47 ` Jianguo Wu
2012-11-30 2:47 ` Jianguo Wu
2012-11-30 2:55 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-11-30 2:55 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-11-30 2:55 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-11-30 2:55 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-11-30 2:55 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-12-03 2:23 ` Jianguo Wu
2012-12-03 2:23 ` Jianguo Wu
2012-12-03 2:23 ` Jianguo Wu
2012-12-03 2:23 ` Jianguo Wu
2012-12-03 2:23 ` Jianguo Wu
2012-12-04 9:13 ` Tang Chen [this message]
2012-12-04 9:13 ` Tang Chen
2012-12-04 9:13 ` Tang Chen
2012-12-04 9:13 ` Tang Chen
2012-12-04 12:20 ` Jianguo Wu
2012-12-04 12:20 ` Jianguo Wu
2012-12-04 12:20 ` Jianguo Wu
2012-12-04 12:20 ` Jianguo Wu
2012-12-04 12:20 ` Jianguo Wu
2012-12-05 2:07 ` Tang Chen
2012-12-05 2:07 ` Tang Chen
2012-12-05 2:07 ` Tang Chen
2012-12-05 2:07 ` Tang Chen
2012-12-05 3:23 ` Jianguo Wu
2012-12-05 3:23 ` Jianguo Wu
2012-12-05 3:23 ` Jianguo Wu
2012-12-05 3:23 ` Jianguo Wu
2012-12-05 3:23 ` Jianguo Wu
2012-12-07 1:42 ` Tang Chen
2012-12-07 1:42 ` Tang Chen
2012-12-07 1:42 ` Tang Chen
2012-12-07 1:42 ` Tang Chen
2012-12-07 2:20 ` Jianguo Wu
2012-12-07 2:20 ` Jianguo Wu
2012-12-07 2:20 ` Jianguo Wu
2012-12-07 2:20 ` Jianguo Wu
2012-12-07 2:20 ` Jianguo Wu
2012-12-04 9:47 ` Tang Chen
2012-12-04 9:47 ` Tang Chen
2012-12-04 9:47 ` Tang Chen
2012-12-04 9:47 ` Tang Chen
2012-11-27 9:59 ` [Patch v4 09/12] memory-hotplug: remove page table of x86_64 architecture Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00 ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00 ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00 ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00 ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 9:59 ` Wen Congyang
2012-12-07 6:43 ` Tang Chen
2012-12-07 6:43 ` Tang Chen
2012-12-07 6:43 ` Tang Chen
2012-12-07 6:43 ` Tang Chen
2012-12-07 7:06 ` Jianguo Wu
2012-12-07 7:06 ` Jianguo Wu
2012-12-07 7:06 ` Jianguo Wu
2012-12-07 7:06 ` Jianguo Wu
2012-12-07 7:06 ` Jianguo Wu
2012-11-27 10:00 ` [Patch v4 02/12] memory-hotplug: check whether all memory blocks are offlined or not when removing memory Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00 ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00 ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00 ` [Patch v4 02/12] memory-hotplug: check whether all memory blocks are offlined or not when removing m Wen Congyang
2012-12-04 9:22 ` [Patch v4 02/12] memory-hotplug: check whether all memory blocks are offlined or not when removing memory Tang Chen
2012-12-04 9:22 ` Tang Chen
2012-12-04 9:22 ` Tang Chen
2012-12-04 9:22 ` [Patch v4 02/12] memory-hotplug: check whether all memory blocks are offlined or not when removi Tang Chen
2012-11-27 10:00 ` [Patch v4 03/12] memory-hotplug: remove redundant codes Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00 ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00 ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00 ` Wen Congyang
2012-12-04 9:22 ` Tang Chen
2012-12-04 9:22 ` Tang Chen
2012-12-04 9:22 ` Tang Chen
2012-12-04 9:22 ` Tang Chen
2012-12-04 10:31 ` Tang Chen
2012-12-04 10:31 ` Tang Chen
2012-12-04 10:31 ` Tang Chen
2012-12-04 10:31 ` Tang Chen
2012-11-27 10:00 ` [Patch v4 04/12] memory-hotplug: remove /sys/firmware/memmap/X sysfs Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00 ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00 ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00 ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00 ` [Patch v4 06/12] memory-hotplug: unregister memory section on SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00 ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00 ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00 ` Wen Congyang
2012-12-04 9:34 ` Tang Chen
2012-12-04 9:34 ` Tang Chen
2012-12-04 9:34 ` Tang Chen
2012-12-04 9:34 ` Tang Chen
2012-11-27 10:00 ` [Patch v4 07/12] memory-hotplug: implement register_page_bootmem_info_section of sparse-vmemmap Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00 ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00 ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00 ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00 ` [Patch v4 10/12] memory-hotplug: memory_hotplug: clear zone when removing the memory Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00 ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00 ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00 ` Wen Congyang
2012-12-04 10:09 ` Tang Chen
2012-12-04 10:09 ` Tang Chen
2012-12-04 10:09 ` Tang Chen
2012-12-04 10:09 ` Tang Chen
2012-11-27 10:00 ` [Patch v4 11/12] memory-hotplug: remove sysfs file of node Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00 ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00 ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00 ` Wen Congyang
2012-12-04 10:10 ` Tang Chen
2012-12-04 10:10 ` Tang Chen
2012-12-04 10:10 ` Tang Chen
2012-12-04 10:10 ` Tang Chen
2012-11-27 19:27 ` [Patch v4 00/12] memory-hotplug: hot-remove physical memory Andrew Morton
2012-11-27 19:27 ` Andrew Morton
2012-11-27 19:27 ` Andrew Morton
2012-11-27 19:27 ` Andrew Morton
2012-11-27 19:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-27 19:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-27 19:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-27 19:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-28 0:43 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-11-28 0:43 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-11-28 0:43 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-11-28 0:43 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-11-28 0:43 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-11-30 6:37 ` Tang Chen
2012-11-30 6:37 ` Tang Chen
2012-11-30 6:37 ` Tang Chen
2012-11-30 6:37 ` Tang Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50BDBEB7.3070807@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=cmetcalf@tilera.com \
--cc=isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=liuj97@gmail.com \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wency@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=wujianguo@huawei.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.