All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jianguo Wu <wujianguo@huawei.com>
To: Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, cmetcalf@tilera.com,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>, Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
	benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch v4 09/12] memory-hotplug: remove page table of x86_64 architecture
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 15:06:16 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50C19568.7080500@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50C19022.9000501@cn.fujitsu.com>

On 2012/12/7 14:43, Tang Chen wrote:

> On 11/27/2012 06:00 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:
>> For hot removing memory, we sholud remove page table about the memory.
>> So the patch searches a page table about the removed memory, and clear
>> page table.
> 
> (snip)
> 
>> +void __meminit
>> +kernel_physical_mapping_remove(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
>> +{
>> +    unsigned long next;
>> +    bool pgd_changed = false;
>> +
>> +    start = (unsigned long)__va(start);
>> +    end = (unsigned long)__va(end);
> 
> Hi Wu,
> 
> Here, you expect start and end are physical addresses. But in
> phys_xxx_remove() function, I think using virtual addresses is just
> fine. Functions like pmd_addr_end() and pud_index() only calculate
> an offset.
>

Hi Tang,

 

Virtual addresses will work fine, I used physical addresses in order to
keep consistent with phys_pud[pmd/pte]_init(), So I think we should keep this.

Thanks,
Jianguo Wu

> So, would you please tell me if we have to use physical addresses here ?
> 
> Thanks. :)
> 
>> +
>> +    for (; start<  end; start = next) {
>> +        pgd_t *pgd = pgd_offset_k(start);
>> +        pud_t *pud;
>> +
>> +        next = pgd_addr_end(start, end);
>> +
>> +        if (!pgd_present(*pgd))
>> +            continue;
>> +
>> +        pud = map_low_page((pud_t *)pgd_page_vaddr(*pgd));
>> +        phys_pud_remove(pud, __pa(start), __pa(next));
>> +        if (free_pud_table(pud, pgd))
>> +            pgd_changed = true;
>> +        unmap_low_page(pud);
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    if (pgd_changed)
>> +        sync_global_pgds(start, end - 1);
>> +
>> +    flush_tlb_all();
>> +}
>> +
>>   #ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
>>   int __ref arch_remove_memory(u64 start, u64 size)
>>   {
>> @@ -692,6 +921,8 @@ int __ref arch_remove_memory(u64 start, u64 size)
>>       ret = __remove_pages(zone, start_pfn, nr_pages);
>>       WARN_ON_ONCE(ret);
>>
>> +    kernel_physical_mapping_remove(start, start + size);
>> +
>>       return ret;
>>   }
>>   #endif
> 
> 
> 
> .
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jianguo Wu <wujianguo@huawei.com>
To: Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, cmetcalf@tilera.com,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>, Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
	benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch v4 09/12] memory-hotplug: remove page table of x86_64 architecture
Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 07:06:16 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50C19568.7080500@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50C19022.9000501@cn.fujitsu.com>

On 2012/12/7 14:43, Tang Chen wrote:

> On 11/27/2012 06:00 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:
>> For hot removing memory, we sholud remove page table about the memory.
>> So the patch searches a page table about the removed memory, and clear
>> page table.
> 
> (snip)
> 
>> +void __meminit
>> +kernel_physical_mapping_remove(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
>> +{
>> +    unsigned long next;
>> +    bool pgd_changed = false;
>> +
>> +    start = (unsigned long)__va(start);
>> +    end = (unsigned long)__va(end);
> 
> Hi Wu,
> 
> Here, you expect start and end are physical addresses. But in
> phys_xxx_remove() function, I think using virtual addresses is just
> fine. Functions like pmd_addr_end() and pud_index() only calculate
> an offset.
>

Hi Tang,

 

Virtual addresses will work fine, I used physical addresses in order to
keep consistent with phys_pud[pmd/pte]_init(), So I think we should keep this.

Thanks,
Jianguo Wu

> So, would you please tell me if we have to use physical addresses here ?
> 
> Thanks. :)
> 
>> +
>> +    for (; start<  end; start = next) {
>> +        pgd_t *pgd = pgd_offset_k(start);
>> +        pud_t *pud;
>> +
>> +        next = pgd_addr_end(start, end);
>> +
>> +        if (!pgd_present(*pgd))
>> +            continue;
>> +
>> +        pud = map_low_page((pud_t *)pgd_page_vaddr(*pgd));
>> +        phys_pud_remove(pud, __pa(start), __pa(next));
>> +        if (free_pud_table(pud, pgd))
>> +            pgd_changed = true;
>> +        unmap_low_page(pud);
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    if (pgd_changed)
>> +        sync_global_pgds(start, end - 1);
>> +
>> +    flush_tlb_all();
>> +}
>> +
>>   #ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
>>   int __ref arch_remove_memory(u64 start, u64 size)
>>   {
>> @@ -692,6 +921,8 @@ int __ref arch_remove_memory(u64 start, u64 size)
>>       ret = __remove_pages(zone, start_pfn, nr_pages);
>>       WARN_ON_ONCE(ret);
>>
>> +    kernel_physical_mapping_remove(start, start + size);
>> +
>>       return ret;
>>   }
>>   #endif
> 
> 
> 
> .
> 




WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jianguo Wu <wujianguo@huawei.com>
To: Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, paulus@samba.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>, Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>,
	Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	cmetcalf@tilera.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [Patch v4 09/12] memory-hotplug: remove page table of x86_64 architecture
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 15:06:16 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50C19568.7080500@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50C19022.9000501@cn.fujitsu.com>

On 2012/12/7 14:43, Tang Chen wrote:

> On 11/27/2012 06:00 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:
>> For hot removing memory, we sholud remove page table about the memory.
>> So the patch searches a page table about the removed memory, and clear
>> page table.
> 
> (snip)
> 
>> +void __meminit
>> +kernel_physical_mapping_remove(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
>> +{
>> +    unsigned long next;
>> +    bool pgd_changed = false;
>> +
>> +    start = (unsigned long)__va(start);
>> +    end = (unsigned long)__va(end);
> 
> Hi Wu,
> 
> Here, you expect start and end are physical addresses. But in
> phys_xxx_remove() function, I think using virtual addresses is just
> fine. Functions like pmd_addr_end() and pud_index() only calculate
> an offset.
>

Hi Tang,

 

Virtual addresses will work fine, I used physical addresses in order to
keep consistent with phys_pud[pmd/pte]_init(), So I think we should keep this.

Thanks,
Jianguo Wu

> So, would you please tell me if we have to use physical addresses here ?
> 
> Thanks. :)
> 
>> +
>> +    for (; start<  end; start = next) {
>> +        pgd_t *pgd = pgd_offset_k(start);
>> +        pud_t *pud;
>> +
>> +        next = pgd_addr_end(start, end);
>> +
>> +        if (!pgd_present(*pgd))
>> +            continue;
>> +
>> +        pud = map_low_page((pud_t *)pgd_page_vaddr(*pgd));
>> +        phys_pud_remove(pud, __pa(start), __pa(next));
>> +        if (free_pud_table(pud, pgd))
>> +            pgd_changed = true;
>> +        unmap_low_page(pud);
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    if (pgd_changed)
>> +        sync_global_pgds(start, end - 1);
>> +
>> +    flush_tlb_all();
>> +}
>> +
>>   #ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
>>   int __ref arch_remove_memory(u64 start, u64 size)
>>   {
>> @@ -692,6 +921,8 @@ int __ref arch_remove_memory(u64 start, u64 size)
>>       ret = __remove_pages(zone, start_pfn, nr_pages);
>>       WARN_ON_ONCE(ret);
>>
>> +    kernel_physical_mapping_remove(start, start + size);
>> +
>>       return ret;
>>   }
>>   #endif
> 
> 
> 
> .
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jianguo Wu <wujianguo@huawei.com>
To: Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, cmetcalf@tilera.com,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>, Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
	benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch v4 09/12] memory-hotplug: remove page table of x86_64 architecture
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 15:06:16 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50C19568.7080500@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50C19022.9000501@cn.fujitsu.com>

On 2012/12/7 14:43, Tang Chen wrote:

> On 11/27/2012 06:00 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:
>> For hot removing memory, we sholud remove page table about the memory.
>> So the patch searches a page table about the removed memory, and clear
>> page table.
> 
> (snip)
> 
>> +void __meminit
>> +kernel_physical_mapping_remove(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
>> +{
>> +    unsigned long next;
>> +    bool pgd_changed = false;
>> +
>> +    start = (unsigned long)__va(start);
>> +    end = (unsigned long)__va(end);
> 
> Hi Wu,
> 
> Here, you expect start and end are physical addresses. But in
> phys_xxx_remove() function, I think using virtual addresses is just
> fine. Functions like pmd_addr_end() and pud_index() only calculate
> an offset.
>

Hi Tang,

 

Virtual addresses will work fine, I used physical addresses in order to
keep consistent with phys_pud[pmd/pte]_init(), So I think we should keep this.

Thanks,
Jianguo Wu

> So, would you please tell me if we have to use physical addresses here ?
> 
> Thanks. :)
> 
>> +
>> +    for (; start<  end; start = next) {
>> +        pgd_t *pgd = pgd_offset_k(start);
>> +        pud_t *pud;
>> +
>> +        next = pgd_addr_end(start, end);
>> +
>> +        if (!pgd_present(*pgd))
>> +            continue;
>> +
>> +        pud = map_low_page((pud_t *)pgd_page_vaddr(*pgd));
>> +        phys_pud_remove(pud, __pa(start), __pa(next));
>> +        if (free_pud_table(pud, pgd))
>> +            pgd_changed = true;
>> +        unmap_low_page(pud);
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    if (pgd_changed)
>> +        sync_global_pgds(start, end - 1);
>> +
>> +    flush_tlb_all();
>> +}
>> +
>>   #ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
>>   int __ref arch_remove_memory(u64 start, u64 size)
>>   {
>> @@ -692,6 +921,8 @@ int __ref arch_remove_memory(u64 start, u64 size)
>>       ret = __remove_pages(zone, start_pfn, nr_pages);
>>       WARN_ON_ONCE(ret);
>>
>> +    kernel_physical_mapping_remove(start, start + size);
>> +
>>       return ret;
>>   }
>>   #endif
> 
> 
> 
> .
> 



--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jianguo Wu <wujianguo@huawei.com>
To: Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>, <x86@kernel.org>,
	<linux-mm@kvack.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>, <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org>, <cmetcalf@tilera.com>,
	<sparclinux@vger.kernel.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>, Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
	<benh@kernel.crashing.org>, <paulus@samba.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch v4 09/12] memory-hotplug: remove page table of x86_64 architecture
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 15:06:16 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50C19568.7080500@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50C19022.9000501@cn.fujitsu.com>

On 2012/12/7 14:43, Tang Chen wrote:

> On 11/27/2012 06:00 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:
>> For hot removing memory, we sholud remove page table about the memory.
>> So the patch searches a page table about the removed memory, and clear
>> page table.
> 
> (snip)
> 
>> +void __meminit
>> +kernel_physical_mapping_remove(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
>> +{
>> +    unsigned long next;
>> +    bool pgd_changed = false;
>> +
>> +    start = (unsigned long)__va(start);
>> +    end = (unsigned long)__va(end);
> 
> Hi Wu,
> 
> Here, you expect start and end are physical addresses. But in
> phys_xxx_remove() function, I think using virtual addresses is just
> fine. Functions like pmd_addr_end() and pud_index() only calculate
> an offset.
>

Hi Tang,

 

Virtual addresses will work fine, I used physical addresses in order to
keep consistent with phys_pud[pmd/pte]_init(), So I think we should keep this.

Thanks,
Jianguo Wu

> So, would you please tell me if we have to use physical addresses here ?
> 
> Thanks. :)
> 
>> +
>> +    for (; start<  end; start = next) {
>> +        pgd_t *pgd = pgd_offset_k(start);
>> +        pud_t *pud;
>> +
>> +        next = pgd_addr_end(start, end);
>> +
>> +        if (!pgd_present(*pgd))
>> +            continue;
>> +
>> +        pud = map_low_page((pud_t *)pgd_page_vaddr(*pgd));
>> +        phys_pud_remove(pud, __pa(start), __pa(next));
>> +        if (free_pud_table(pud, pgd))
>> +            pgd_changed = true;
>> +        unmap_low_page(pud);
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    if (pgd_changed)
>> +        sync_global_pgds(start, end - 1);
>> +
>> +    flush_tlb_all();
>> +}
>> +
>>   #ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
>>   int __ref arch_remove_memory(u64 start, u64 size)
>>   {
>> @@ -692,6 +921,8 @@ int __ref arch_remove_memory(u64 start, u64 size)
>>       ret = __remove_pages(zone, start_pfn, nr_pages);
>>       WARN_ON_ONCE(ret);
>>
>> +    kernel_physical_mapping_remove(start, start + size);
>> +
>>       return ret;
>>   }
>>   #endif
> 
> 
> 
> .
> 




  reply	other threads:[~2012-12-07  7:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 176+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-27 10:00 [Patch v4 00/12] memory-hotplug: hot-remove physical memory Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00 ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00 ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00 ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-27  9:58 ` [Patch v4 01/12] memory-hotplug: try to offline the memory twice to avoid dependence Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00   ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00   ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00   ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00   ` Wen Congyang
2012-12-04  9:17   ` Tang Chen
2012-12-04  9:17     ` Tang Chen
2012-12-04  9:17     ` Tang Chen
2012-12-04  9:17     ` Tang Chen
2012-11-27  9:58 ` [Patch v4 05/12] memory-hotplug: introduce new function arch_remove_memory() for removing page table Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00   ` [Patch v4 05/12] memory-hotplug: introduce new function arch_remove_memory() for removing page table depends on architecture Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00   ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00   ` [Patch v4 05/12] memory-hotplug: introduce new function arch_remove_memory() for removing page table Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00   ` [Patch v4 05/12] memory-hotplug: introduce new function arch_remove_memory() for removing page table depends on architecture Wen Congyang
2012-11-27  9:59   ` [Patch v4 05/12] memory-hotplug: introduce new function arch_remove_memory() for removing page table Wen Congyang
2012-12-04  9:30   ` [Patch v4 05/12] memory-hotplug: introduce new function arch_remove_memory() for removing page table depends on architecture Tang Chen
2012-12-04  9:30     ` Tang Chen
2012-12-04  9:30     ` Tang Chen
2012-12-04  9:30     ` [Patch v4 05/12] memory-hotplug: introduce new function arch_remove_memory() for removing page t Tang Chen
2012-11-27  9:59 ` [Patch v4 12/12] memory-hotplug: free node_data when a node is offlined Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00   ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00   ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00   ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-27  9:59   ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-27  9:59   ` Wen Congyang
2012-12-04 10:10   ` Tang Chen
2012-12-04 10:10     ` Tang Chen
2012-12-04 10:10     ` Tang Chen
2012-12-04 10:10     ` Tang Chen
2012-11-27  9:59 ` [Patch v4 08/12] memory-hotplug: remove memmap of sparse-vmemmap Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00   ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00   ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00   ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00   ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-28  9:40   ` Jianguo Wu
2012-11-28  9:40     ` Jianguo Wu
2012-11-28  9:40     ` Jianguo Wu
2012-11-28  9:40     ` Jianguo Wu
2012-11-28  9:40     ` Jianguo Wu
2012-11-30  1:45     ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-30  1:45       ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-30  1:45       ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-30  1:45       ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-30  2:47       ` Jianguo Wu
2012-11-30  2:47         ` Jianguo Wu
2012-11-30  2:47         ` Jianguo Wu
2012-11-30  2:47         ` Jianguo Wu
2012-11-30  2:55         ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-11-30  2:55           ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-11-30  2:55           ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-11-30  2:55           ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-11-30  2:55           ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-12-03  2:23       ` Jianguo Wu
2012-12-03  2:23         ` Jianguo Wu
2012-12-03  2:23         ` Jianguo Wu
2012-12-03  2:23         ` Jianguo Wu
2012-12-03  2:23         ` Jianguo Wu
2012-12-04  9:13         ` Tang Chen
2012-12-04  9:13           ` Tang Chen
2012-12-04  9:13           ` Tang Chen
2012-12-04  9:13           ` Tang Chen
2012-12-04 12:20           ` Jianguo Wu
2012-12-04 12:20             ` Jianguo Wu
2012-12-04 12:20             ` Jianguo Wu
2012-12-04 12:20             ` Jianguo Wu
2012-12-04 12:20             ` Jianguo Wu
2012-12-05  2:07             ` Tang Chen
2012-12-05  2:07               ` Tang Chen
2012-12-05  2:07               ` Tang Chen
2012-12-05  2:07               ` Tang Chen
2012-12-05  3:23               ` Jianguo Wu
2012-12-05  3:23                 ` Jianguo Wu
2012-12-05  3:23                 ` Jianguo Wu
2012-12-05  3:23                 ` Jianguo Wu
2012-12-05  3:23                 ` Jianguo Wu
2012-12-07  1:42         ` Tang Chen
2012-12-07  1:42           ` Tang Chen
2012-12-07  1:42           ` Tang Chen
2012-12-07  1:42           ` Tang Chen
2012-12-07  2:20           ` Jianguo Wu
2012-12-07  2:20             ` Jianguo Wu
2012-12-07  2:20             ` Jianguo Wu
2012-12-07  2:20             ` Jianguo Wu
2012-12-07  2:20             ` Jianguo Wu
2012-12-04  9:47   ` Tang Chen
2012-12-04  9:47     ` Tang Chen
2012-12-04  9:47     ` Tang Chen
2012-12-04  9:47     ` Tang Chen
2012-11-27  9:59 ` [Patch v4 09/12] memory-hotplug: remove page table of x86_64 architecture Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00   ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00   ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00   ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00   ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-27  9:59   ` Wen Congyang
2012-12-07  6:43   ` Tang Chen
2012-12-07  6:43     ` Tang Chen
2012-12-07  6:43     ` Tang Chen
2012-12-07  6:43     ` Tang Chen
2012-12-07  7:06     ` Jianguo Wu [this message]
2012-12-07  7:06       ` Jianguo Wu
2012-12-07  7:06       ` Jianguo Wu
2012-12-07  7:06       ` Jianguo Wu
2012-12-07  7:06       ` Jianguo Wu
2012-11-27 10:00 ` [Patch v4 02/12] memory-hotplug: check whether all memory blocks are offlined or not when removing memory Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00   ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00   ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00   ` [Patch v4 02/12] memory-hotplug: check whether all memory blocks are offlined or not when removing m Wen Congyang
2012-12-04  9:22   ` [Patch v4 02/12] memory-hotplug: check whether all memory blocks are offlined or not when removing memory Tang Chen
2012-12-04  9:22     ` Tang Chen
2012-12-04  9:22     ` Tang Chen
2012-12-04  9:22     ` [Patch v4 02/12] memory-hotplug: check whether all memory blocks are offlined or not when removi Tang Chen
2012-11-27 10:00 ` [Patch v4 03/12] memory-hotplug: remove redundant codes Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00   ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00   ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00   ` Wen Congyang
2012-12-04  9:22   ` Tang Chen
2012-12-04  9:22     ` Tang Chen
2012-12-04  9:22     ` Tang Chen
2012-12-04  9:22     ` Tang Chen
2012-12-04 10:31     ` Tang Chen
2012-12-04 10:31       ` Tang Chen
2012-12-04 10:31       ` Tang Chen
2012-12-04 10:31       ` Tang Chen
2012-11-27 10:00 ` [Patch v4 04/12] memory-hotplug: remove /sys/firmware/memmap/X sysfs Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00   ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00   ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00   ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00 ` [Patch v4 06/12] memory-hotplug: unregister memory section on SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00   ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00   ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00   ` Wen Congyang
2012-12-04  9:34   ` Tang Chen
2012-12-04  9:34     ` Tang Chen
2012-12-04  9:34     ` Tang Chen
2012-12-04  9:34     ` Tang Chen
2012-11-27 10:00 ` [Patch v4 07/12] memory-hotplug: implement register_page_bootmem_info_section of sparse-vmemmap Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00   ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00   ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00   ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00 ` [Patch v4 10/12] memory-hotplug: memory_hotplug: clear zone when removing the memory Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00   ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00   ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00   ` Wen Congyang
2012-12-04 10:09   ` Tang Chen
2012-12-04 10:09     ` Tang Chen
2012-12-04 10:09     ` Tang Chen
2012-12-04 10:09     ` Tang Chen
2012-11-27 10:00 ` [Patch v4 11/12] memory-hotplug: remove sysfs file of node Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00   ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00   ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00   ` Wen Congyang
2012-12-04 10:10   ` Tang Chen
2012-12-04 10:10     ` Tang Chen
2012-12-04 10:10     ` Tang Chen
2012-12-04 10:10     ` Tang Chen
2012-11-27 19:27 ` [Patch v4 00/12] memory-hotplug: hot-remove physical memory Andrew Morton
2012-11-27 19:27   ` Andrew Morton
2012-11-27 19:27   ` Andrew Morton
2012-11-27 19:27   ` Andrew Morton
2012-11-27 19:38   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-27 19:38     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-27 19:38     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-27 19:38     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-28  0:43   ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-11-28  0:43     ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-11-28  0:43     ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-11-28  0:43     ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-11-28  0:43     ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-11-30  6:37   ` Tang Chen
2012-11-30  6:37     ` Tang Chen
2012-11-30  6:37     ` Tang Chen
2012-11-30  6:37     ` Tang Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50C19568.7080500@huawei.com \
    --to=wujianguo@huawei.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=cmetcalf@tilera.com \
    --cc=isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=jiang.liu@huawei.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=liuj97@gmail.com \
    --cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=wency@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.