From: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: kgene.kim@samsung.com, patches@linaro.org, t.figa@samsung.com,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@linaro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: add pinctrl nodes for Exynos5250 SoC
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 09:08:59 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50D0A32B.9050400@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdZgSpkHW3mW_2ZhvUWVTX7Qppb5G8d+MdD3zUDOYCY-pw@mail.gmail.com>
On 12/14/12 12:34, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Thomas Abraham
> <thomas.abraham@linaro.org> wrote:
>
>> Add pinctrl device nodes for Exynos5250 SoC.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham<thomas.abraham@linaro.org>
>
> Acked-by: Linus Walleij<linus.walleij@linaro.org>
>
>> - The individual device nodes which are using the old style Samsung gpio
>> bindings have not been converted over to pinctrl bindings yet. It might
>> also be important to know if Linus's pinctrl grab in device core patch
>> (http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1409263) gets accepted.
>
> Greg seems happy with it and the plan is to have it merged for kernel
> v3.9.
>
> I intend to push Greg for an ACK and queue it for linux-next right after the
> merge window.
>
Same here ;-)
>> - This patch should not be merged for now which otherwise would break existing
>> platforms which are using the old samsung gpio driver bindings. This patch
>> is intended to get started with the migration to pinctrl framework.
>> It is probably better to first prepare all the migration patches and
>> merge them as a bunch.
>
> Sure. I guess it'll be taken through the Samsung tree anyway, right?
>
I'm OK on this, if Greg is OK, then let me pick this up in Samsung tree.
Thanks.
Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: kgene.kim@samsung.com (Kukjin Kim)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: dts: add pinctrl nodes for Exynos5250 SoC
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 09:08:59 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50D0A32B.9050400@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdZgSpkHW3mW_2ZhvUWVTX7Qppb5G8d+MdD3zUDOYCY-pw@mail.gmail.com>
On 12/14/12 12:34, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Thomas Abraham
> <thomas.abraham@linaro.org> wrote:
>
>> Add pinctrl device nodes for Exynos5250 SoC.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham<thomas.abraham@linaro.org>
>
> Acked-by: Linus Walleij<linus.walleij@linaro.org>
>
>> - The individual device nodes which are using the old style Samsung gpio
>> bindings have not been converted over to pinctrl bindings yet. It might
>> also be important to know if Linus's pinctrl grab in device core patch
>> (http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1409263) gets accepted.
>
> Greg seems happy with it and the plan is to have it merged for kernel
> v3.9.
>
> I intend to push Greg for an ACK and queue it for linux-next right after the
> merge window.
>
Same here ;-)
>> - This patch should not be merged for now which otherwise would break existing
>> platforms which are using the old samsung gpio driver bindings. This patch
>> is intended to get started with the migration to pinctrl framework.
>> It is probably better to first prepare all the migration patches and
>> merge them as a bunch.
>
> Sure. I guess it'll be taken through the Samsung tree anyway, right?
>
I'm OK on this, if Greg is OK, then let me pick this up in Samsung tree.
Thanks.
Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-18 17:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-13 13:06 [PATCH] ARM: dts: add pinctrl nodes for Exynos5250 SoC Thomas Abraham
2012-12-13 13:06 ` Thomas Abraham
2012-12-14 20:34 ` Linus Walleij
2012-12-14 20:34 ` Linus Walleij
2012-12-18 17:08 ` Kukjin Kim [this message]
2012-12-18 17:08 ` Kukjin Kim
2013-04-24 23:33 ` Olof Johansson
2013-04-24 23:33 ` Olof Johansson
2013-04-25 7:38 ` Thomas Abraham
2013-04-25 7:38 ` Thomas Abraham
2013-04-26 18:15 ` Olof Johansson
2013-04-26 18:15 ` Olof Johansson
[not found] ` <CA+Ln22EafDes5Lrvpwg08HnyNRuo=Z2uHAg6VJDMjNon9=E_qQ@mail.gmail.com>
2013-04-25 9:13 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-04-25 9:13 ` Tomasz Figa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50D0A32B.9050400@samsung.com \
--to=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@linaro.org \
--cc=t.figa@samsung.com \
--cc=thomas.abraham@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.