All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: R Sricharan <r.sricharan@ti.com>
To: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
Cc: Luciano Coelho <coelho@ti.com>,
	balbi@ti.com, Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	svenkatr@ti.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, cjb@laptop.org, lrg@ti.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Subject: Re: 32kHz clock removal causes problems omap_hsmmc
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 23:36:55 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50D2023F.1000609@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50D1C957.8090201@ti.com>

Hi,

On Wednesday 19 December 2012 07:34 PM, Benoit Cousson wrote:
> On 12/19/2012 02:58 PM, Luciano Coelho wrote:
>> On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 14:51 +0100, Benoit Cousson wrote:
>>> On 12/19/2012 02:01 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 11:56:20AM +0100, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>>>>> BTW: have you happened to ubdate u-boot recently? There is a nice easter egg
>>>>> added there:
>>>>> f3f98bb ARM: OMAP4/5: Do not configure non essential pads, clocks, dplls.
>>>>>
>>>>> Which means that _essential_ clocks and pads are no longer configured.
>>>>
>>>> anything essential you can list ?
>>>
>>> Yeah, that u-boot version is just unusable at all with any mainline
>>> kernel, since we are still missing pads conf for every drivers.
>>>
>>> Regarding the 32k clock, I noticed as well that the OMAP4460 panda
>>> u-boot is the only one to enable it at boot time, and thus this is the
>>> only board that can probe the wilink chip properly as of today.
>>
>> Do you mean that with the latest mainline u-boot all boards will have
>> trouble except panda?
>
> I don't know since the u-boot mainline has never ever supported properly
> the SDP4430, I stopped wasting my time with that code a long time ago.
> But the braves who tried using the latest u-boot mainline code that does
> not configure anything anymore had some troubles...
>
   Configuring every pad and clocks in the u-boot was removed to
   force kernel drivers to fix up things. Dependency on boot loader
   was always a problem. Bootloader should not configure anything apart
   from what is required for boot.

Regards,
  Sricharan



WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: R Sricharan <r.sricharan@ti.com>
To: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
Cc: Luciano Coelho <coelho@ti.com>, <balbi@ti.com>,
	Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	<svenkatr@ti.com>, <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>, <cjb@laptop.org>, <lrg@ti.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Subject: Re: 32kHz clock removal causes problems omap_hsmmc
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 23:36:55 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50D2023F.1000609@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50D1C957.8090201@ti.com>

Hi,

On Wednesday 19 December 2012 07:34 PM, Benoit Cousson wrote:
> On 12/19/2012 02:58 PM, Luciano Coelho wrote:
>> On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 14:51 +0100, Benoit Cousson wrote:
>>> On 12/19/2012 02:01 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 11:56:20AM +0100, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>>>>> BTW: have you happened to ubdate u-boot recently? There is a nice easter egg
>>>>> added there:
>>>>> f3f98bb ARM: OMAP4/5: Do not configure non essential pads, clocks, dplls.
>>>>>
>>>>> Which means that _essential_ clocks and pads are no longer configured.
>>>>
>>>> anything essential you can list ?
>>>
>>> Yeah, that u-boot version is just unusable at all with any mainline
>>> kernel, since we are still missing pads conf for every drivers.
>>>
>>> Regarding the 32k clock, I noticed as well that the OMAP4460 panda
>>> u-boot is the only one to enable it at boot time, and thus this is the
>>> only board that can probe the wilink chip properly as of today.
>>
>> Do you mean that with the latest mainline u-boot all boards will have
>> trouble except panda?
>
> I don't know since the u-boot mainline has never ever supported properly
> the SDP4430, I stopped wasting my time with that code a long time ago.
> But the braves who tried using the latest u-boot mainline code that does
> not configure anything anymore had some troubles...
>
   Configuring every pad and clocks in the u-boot was removed to
   force kernel drivers to fix up things. Dependency on boot loader
   was always a problem. Bootloader should not configure anything apart
   from what is required for boot.

Regards,
  Sricharan



  reply	other threads:[~2012-12-19 18:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-15  8:31 32kHz clock removal causes problems omap_hsmmc Luciano Coelho
2012-11-15  8:31 ` Luciano Coelho
2012-12-18  9:54 ` Felipe Balbi
2012-12-18  9:54   ` Felipe Balbi
2012-12-19  9:45   ` Mark Brown
2012-12-19 10:00     ` Peter Ujfalusi
2012-12-19 10:00       ` Peter Ujfalusi
2012-12-19 10:09       ` Mark Brown
2012-12-19 10:18         ` Peter Ujfalusi
2012-12-19 10:18           ` Peter Ujfalusi
2012-12-19 10:32           ` Mark Brown
2012-12-19 10:45             ` Luciano Coelho
2012-12-19 10:45               ` Luciano Coelho
2012-12-19 10:56               ` Peter Ujfalusi
2012-12-19 10:56                 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2012-12-19 11:00                 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2012-12-19 11:00                   ` Peter Ujfalusi
2012-12-19 11:02                 ` Mark Brown
2012-12-19 11:07                 ` Luciano Coelho
2012-12-19 11:07                   ` Luciano Coelho
2012-12-19 13:01                 ` Felipe Balbi
2012-12-19 13:01                   ` Felipe Balbi
2012-12-19 13:51                   ` Benoit Cousson
2012-12-19 13:51                     ` Benoit Cousson
2012-12-19 13:54                     ` Felipe Balbi
2012-12-19 13:54                       ` Felipe Balbi
2012-12-19 13:58                     ` Mark Brown
2012-12-19 13:58                     ` Luciano Coelho
2012-12-19 13:58                       ` Luciano Coelho
2012-12-19 14:04                       ` Benoit Cousson
2012-12-19 14:04                         ` Benoit Cousson
2012-12-19 18:06                         ` R Sricharan [this message]
2012-12-19 18:06                           ` R Sricharan
2012-12-19 14:31                   ` Peter Ujfalusi
2012-12-19 14:31                     ` Peter Ujfalusi
2012-12-19 16:28           ` Tony Lindgren
2012-12-19 10:01     ` Luciano Coelho
2012-12-19 10:01       ` Luciano Coelho
2012-12-19 10:28       ` Mark Brown
2012-12-19 10:42         ` Luciano Coelho
2012-12-19 10:42           ` Luciano Coelho

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50D2023F.1000609@ti.com \
    --to=r.sricharan@ti.com \
    --cc=b-cousson@ti.com \
    --cc=balbi@ti.com \
    --cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=cjb@laptop.org \
    --cc=coelho@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lrg@ti.com \
    --cc=peter.ujfalusi@ti.com \
    --cc=svenkatr@ti.com \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.