From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
To: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
Cc: "ludovic.desroches" <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: AT91: IIO: add low and high res support for adc
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 10:20:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50EA9344.8060002@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121222172133.GT23971@game.jcrosoft.org>
Le 22/12/2012 18:21, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD a écrit :
> On 10:07 Fri 21 Dec , Maxime Ripard wrote:
>> Le 20/12/2012 17:13, ludovic.desroches a écrit :
>>> I have not found other ways to deal with it properly. I would like to
>>> have them hidden into the driver (depending on the compatible string)
>>> but it will be a mess if we split parameters into dt and driver.
>>
>> I'm glad we feel the same way :)
> I'm not I fee; exactly this opposte way
>
> I do want to toucht the kernel code to add new soc
This is an argument we already had, and yes, I still don't like these
bindings.
And both this patchset and what Ludovic and you said in this thread have
proven that this is something that can't be achieved, you'll always have
to modify the driver anyway.
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com (Maxime Ripard)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: AT91: IIO: add low and high res support for adc
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 10:20:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50EA9344.8060002@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121222172133.GT23971@game.jcrosoft.org>
Le 22/12/2012 18:21, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD a ?crit :
> On 10:07 Fri 21 Dec , Maxime Ripard wrote:
>> Le 20/12/2012 17:13, ludovic.desroches a ?crit :
>>> I have not found other ways to deal with it properly. I would like to
>>> have them hidden into the driver (depending on the compatible string)
>>> but it will be a mess if we split parameters into dt and driver.
>>
>> I'm glad we feel the same way :)
> I'm not I fee; exactly this opposte way
>
> I do want to toucht the kernel code to add new soc
This is an argument we already had, and yes, I still don't like these
bindings.
And both this patchset and what Ludovic and you said in this thread have
proven that this is something that can't be achieved, you'll always have
to modify the driver anyway.
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-07 9:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-19 18:32 [PATCH 0/3] IIO: AT91: add lowres, sleep and sample&hold time missing support Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-12-19 18:32 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-12-19 18:37 ` [PATCH 1/3] ARM: AT91: IIO: add low and high res support for adc Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-12-19 18:37 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-12-19 18:37 ` [PATCH 2/3] ARM: AT91: IIO: add sleep mode support Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-12-19 18:37 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-12-20 10:46 ` Maxime Ripard
2012-12-20 10:46 ` Maxime Ripard
2012-12-27 12:09 ` Jonathan Cameron
2012-12-27 12:09 ` Jonathan Cameron
2012-12-27 17:54 ` Maxime Ripard
2012-12-27 17:54 ` Maxime Ripard
2012-12-19 18:37 ` [PATCH 3/3] ARM: AT91: IIO: fix missing Sample and Hold time Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-12-19 18:37 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-12-20 10:55 ` Maxime Ripard
2012-12-20 10:55 ` Maxime Ripard
2012-12-20 12:49 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-12-20 12:49 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-12-21 9:08 ` Maxime Ripard
2012-12-21 9:08 ` Maxime Ripard
2012-12-20 10:42 ` [PATCH 1/3] ARM: AT91: IIO: add low and high res support for adc Maxime Ripard
2012-12-20 10:42 ` Maxime Ripard
2012-12-20 10:52 ` ludovic.desroches
2012-12-20 15:51 ` Maxime Ripard
2012-12-20 15:51 ` Maxime Ripard
2012-12-20 16:13 ` ludovic.desroches
2012-12-21 9:07 ` Maxime Ripard
2012-12-21 9:07 ` Maxime Ripard
2012-12-22 17:21 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-12-22 17:21 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2013-01-07 9:20 ` Maxime Ripard [this message]
2013-01-07 9:20 ` Maxime Ripard
2012-12-20 10:40 ` [PATCH 0/3] IIO: AT91: add lowres, sleep and sample&hold time missing support Maxime Ripard
2012-12-20 10:40 ` Maxime Ripard
2012-12-20 10:51 ` Nicolas Ferre
2012-12-20 10:51 ` Nicolas Ferre
2012-12-27 12:14 ` Jonathan Cameron
2012-12-27 12:14 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50EA9344.8060002@free-electrons.com \
--to=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ludovic.desroches@atmel.com \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
--cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.