* usb: multi phy support
@ 2013-01-07 11:57 Mohammed, Afzal
[not found] ` <C8443D0743D26F4388EA172BF4E2A7A93EA7FDA7-Er742YJ7I/eIQmiDNMet8wC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mohammed, Afzal @ 2013-01-07 11:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Balbi, Felipe
Cc: ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Nori, Sekhar
Hi Felipe,
AM335x SoC's used in boards like beagle bone has two instances of USB
modules (2.0) at the hardware level, each having a dedicated phy.
Currently in mainline, only one instance of USB is supported
(including a fix in your latest pull request). To support multi
instance, the biggest obstacle is lack of multi phy support for
usb phy's of same type.
Earlier Kishon was working on usb phy device tree support, later it was
seen that generic phy layer was preferred. And Kishon posted a couple of
versions on generic phy framework, latest being on 26th September 2012,
but I could not see follow up's on that series.
It seems Kishon is not now working on generic phy support. Let me know
your opinion/suggestions on supporting usb phy's of same type. We are
trying to get multi USB instance support in mainline for AM335x.
Regards
Afzal
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: usb: multi phy support
[not found] ` <C8443D0743D26F4388EA172BF4E2A7A93EA7FDA7-Er742YJ7I/eIQmiDNMet8wC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org>
@ 2013-01-07 12:00 ` Felipe Balbi
[not found] ` <20130107120040.GD11232-S8G//mZuvNWo5Im9Ml3/Zg@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Felipe Balbi @ 2013-01-07 12:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mohammed, Afzal
Cc: Balbi, Felipe, ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY,
linux-usb-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Nori, Sekhar
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1089 bytes --]
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 12:57:15PM +0100, Mohammed, Afzal wrote:
> AM335x SoC's used in boards like beagle bone has two instances of USB
> modules (2.0) at the hardware level, each having a dedicated phy.
> Currently in mainline, only one instance of USB is supported
> (including a fix in your latest pull request). To support multi
> instance, the biggest obstacle is lack of multi phy support for
> usb phy's of same type.
>
> Earlier Kishon was working on usb phy device tree support, later it was
> seen that generic phy layer was preferred. And Kishon posted a couple of
> versions on generic phy framework, latest being on 26th September 2012,
> but I could not see follow up's on that series.
>
> It seems Kishon is not now working on generic phy support. Let me know
> your opinion/suggestions on supporting usb phy's of same type. We are
> trying to get multi USB instance support in mainline for AM335x.
Kishon is still working on generic PHY layer indeed. Right Kishon ?
I believe he should be sending some newer version soonish...
--
balbi
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: usb: multi phy support
[not found] ` <20130107120040.GD11232-S8G//mZuvNWo5Im9Ml3/Zg@public.gmane.org>
@ 2013-01-07 12:32 ` kishon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: kishon @ 2013-01-07 12:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: balbi-l0cyMroinI0
Cc: Mohammed, Afzal,
linux-usb-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Nori, Sekhar
Hi,
On Monday 07 January 2013 05:30 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 12:57:15PM +0100, Mohammed, Afzal wrote:
>> AM335x SoC's used in boards like beagle bone has two instances of USB
>> modules (2.0) at the hardware level, each having a dedicated phy.
>> Currently in mainline, only one instance of USB is supported
>> (including a fix in your latest pull request). To support multi
>> instance, the biggest obstacle is lack of multi phy support for
>> usb phy's of same type.
>>
>> Earlier Kishon was working on usb phy device tree support, later it was
>> seen that generic phy layer was preferred. And Kishon posted a couple of
>> versions on generic phy framework, latest being on 26th September 2012,
>> but I could not see follow up's on that series.
>>
>> It seems Kishon is not now working on generic phy support. Let me know
>> your opinion/suggestions on supporting usb phy's of same type. We are
>> trying to get multi USB instance support in mainline for AM335x.
>
> Kishon is still working on generic PHY layer indeed. Right Kishon ?
Yes. I'll try and send it ASAP.
Thanks
Kishon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-01-07 12:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-01-07 11:57 usb: multi phy support Mohammed, Afzal
[not found] ` <C8443D0743D26F4388EA172BF4E2A7A93EA7FDA7-Er742YJ7I/eIQmiDNMet8wC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org>
2013-01-07 12:00 ` Felipe Balbi
[not found] ` <20130107120040.GD11232-S8G//mZuvNWo5Im9Ml3/Zg@public.gmane.org>
2013-01-07 12:32 ` kishon
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.