From: Radu Moisan <radu.moisan@intel.com>
To: "Burton, Ross" <ross.burton@intel.com>
Cc: Enrico Scholz <enrico.scholz@sigma-chemnitz.de>,
openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/21][RFC v3] systemd Integration
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 17:11:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50EC3725.2060604@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJTo0LbEV2STP5gYz77rRT5dOXMJ+yMYivzuyHkD7YkpeXH6Hg@mail.gmail.com>
On 01/08/2013 04:57 PM, Burton, Ross wrote:
> On 8 January 2013 15:01, Radu Moisan <radu.moisan@intel.com> wrote:
>> I am pretty sure that I added a 'Signed-off-by:' field to my patch but
>> it is missing in the commit. Other patches don't have the signed-off-by
>> of the original author neither.
>>
>> Was this removal done on purpose?
>>
>>
>> I had to port the patch manually so I guess it got lost then. Do we want to
>> have Sign-off-by from author as well?
> By the time the patches land in oe-core there'll have been a lot of
> rebasing and merging as I don't intend to see a series that contains
> fixes in oe-core. We should ensure that everyone who contributed to
> meta-oe gets a credit in the series.
>
No question about that, the question was whether to add Sign-off-by from
the author itself. I know that we are doing it like that right now, but
I don't understand it's reasoning. Being the author of a patch what
would be the point in adding a Sign-off-by with the same name? I can
agree either way, no question about that, just want it to get it clear
why we do it like we do it.
Radu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-08 15:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-08 12:24 [PATCH 00/21][RFC v3] systemd Integration Radu Moisan
2013-01-08 12:57 ` Enrico Scholz
2013-01-08 15:01 ` Radu Moisan
2013-01-08 14:57 ` Burton, Ross
2013-01-08 15:11 ` Radu Moisan [this message]
2013-01-08 15:10 ` Burton, Ross
2013-01-08 15:18 ` Enrico Scholz
2013-01-08 15:20 ` Samuel Stirtzel
2013-01-09 17:12 ` Khem Raj
2013-01-09 16:51 ` Saul Wold
2013-01-09 17:11 ` Khem Raj
2013-01-09 17:14 ` Khem Raj
2013-01-10 8:02 ` Radu Moisan
2013-01-10 18:27 ` Khem Raj
2013-01-11 15:12 ` Radu Moisan
2013-01-11 17:45 ` Saul Wold
2013-01-14 11:23 ` Radu Moisan
2013-01-11 23:23 ` Saul Wold
2013-01-13 16:27 ` Yi Qingliang
2013-01-14 17:16 ` Radu Moisan
2013-01-14 18:10 ` Saul Wold
2013-01-15 8:00 ` Radu Moisan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50EC3725.2060604@intel.com \
--to=radu.moisan@intel.com \
--cc=enrico.scholz@sigma-chemnitz.de \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=ross.burton@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.