Re: [PATCH 00/21][RFC v3] systemd Integration

[Radu Moisan <radu.moisan@intel.com>]

On 01/11/2013 07:45 PM, Saul Wold wrote:
> On 01/11/2013 07:12 AM, Radu Moisan wrote:
>>
>> On 01/10/2013 08:27 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 12:02 AM, Radu Moisan <radu.moisan@intel.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> On 01/09/2013 07:14 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 4:24 AM, Radu Moisan <radu.moisan@intel.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> As Ross suggested I've done the following changes to the previous 
>>>>>> set:
>>>>>> * added two patches (the first two) that address multiple init 
>>>>>> systems
>>>>>> support,\
>>>>>> as in shifting from default hardcoded sysvinit to something more
>>>>>> generic
>>>>>> while
>>>>>> the default values still remains on sysvinit
>>>>>> * moved automatic setting of PREFERRED_PROVIDER_udev into
>>>>>> default_providers.inc
>>>>>> * removed ahavi-systemd since all it provided was service files; now
>>>>>> service files
>>>>>> are pulled in by avahi-daemon
>>>>>> * also rebased on master
>>>>>>
>>>>> btw. there has been more merges into meta-systemd in 
>>>>> meta-openembedded
>>>>> since these patches were created I cant accertain
>>>>> that you picked those too but please redo this series so the history
>>>>> is a bit better for tracking purposes.
>>>> I've tried to get in sync with meta-openembedded until they upgraded
>>>> systemd
>>>> to v196.
>>> hmm that would also explain the -lrt problem that Saul is seeing but I
>>> dont.
>>>
>>
>> Not quite, the problem Soul is seeing is probably because he is using
>> eglibc v2.17
>> I'm running a world build right now (with eglibc v2.16) and I don't see
>> those problems.
>>
>
> Radu, you I was testing with 2.17, and we need to prepare for the 2.17 
> update occuring, if it occurs before systemd or after these fixes will 
> be needed to happen.
>
>>>   I tried to upgrade but something changed in the latest version and
>>>> dbus-daemon didn't start anymore and because of that a few other
>>>> services
>>>> depending on it. I spent some time debugging it but eventually I
>>>> decided we
>>>> should go with the previous version and address the update after we
>>>> merge.
>>>> More details about this at
>>>> https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1625
>>> but we have to fix it I think weather you merge it or not since I
>>> dont  expect
>>> us to stay at 195 forever and especially when folks who use 
>>> meta-systemd
>>> are already using 196 we wont be able to discard meta-systemd.
>>
>> It's not a question of fixing it or not, rather of when will we fix it.
>> My approach was to have a buildable version
>> that is also stable at runtime and merge that into oe-core. The we will
>> address systemd upgrade as a normal
>> package upgrate, since package upgrade is routine task anyway and we do
>> it for all packages.
> As mentioned above, we will need the updated version of systemd & 
> friends before we can update eglibc, we want both systemd and eglibc 
> in for the M3 build.
>
I agree. I will address Martin's initscripts suggestions first and then 
upgrade systemd.

Radu