All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
To: sedat.dilek@gmail.com
Cc: Thomas Schlichter <thomas.schlichter@web.de>,
	Linux PM List <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuidle: fix new C-states not functional after AC disconnect
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 21:44:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50F31CB9.4010905@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+icZUUUjQTVunewhv+wEsrvyD4FsG9riHa8MRrZdMufyttA4w@mail.gmail.com>

On 01/13/2013 09:36 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> 0001: Refreshed 1-2 as v3 against Linux v3.8-rc3.
> 0002: v2 of 2-2 applied cleanly after 1-2 was refreshed!

Hi Sedat,

for the moment, you should use only the 1/2 because 2/2 (which is an
optimization) is wrong.

Regards.

  -- Daniel

> Have fun!
> 
> - Sedat -
> 
> On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 8:30 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Thomas,
>>
>> I read your original LKML posting in [1].
>>
>> [ QUOTE ]
>> Currently, Daniel Lezcano seems to be working on an intrusive change of not
>> using the power_usage value at all for choosing a C-state:
>>
>> [4] https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/14/155
>>
>> As I could not find any of these patches in any git trees to be merged for
>> 3.8...
>> [ /QUOTE ]
>>
>> You can find the patches at LKML ([2] and [3]) or patchwork ([4] and [5]).
>>
>> As a Linux-Next "customer" I know about Daniel's work for-next [5] but
>> I did not found any other GIT repository of him.
>> Striving through Daniel's other GIT repos I found idlestat [6] and
>> powerdebug [7] tools which I want to test.
>> ( So, thank you for your email! )
>>
>> Have fun!
>>
>> Regards,
>> - Sedat -
>>
>> [0] http://marc.info/?l=linux-acpi&m=135808048905350&w=2
>> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/14/153
>> [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/14/149
>> [3] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1878691/
>> [4] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1878701/
>> [5] http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=people/dlezcano/cpuidle-next.git
>> [6] http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=people/dlezcano/idlestat.git;a=summary
>> [7] http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=people/dlezcano/powerdebug.git;a=summary


-- 
 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
To: sedat.dilek@gmail.com
Cc: Thomas Schlichter <thomas.schlichter@web.de>,
	Linux PM List <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuidle: fix new C-states not functional after AC disconnect
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 21:44:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50F31CB9.4010905@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+icZUUUjQTVunewhv+wEsrvyD4FsG9riHa8MRrZdMufyttA4w@mail.gmail.com>

On 01/13/2013 09:36 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> 0001: Refreshed 1-2 as v3 against Linux v3.8-rc3.
> 0002: v2 of 2-2 applied cleanly after 1-2 was refreshed!

Hi Sedat,

for the moment, you should use only the 1/2 because 2/2 (which is an
optimization) is wrong.

Regards.

  -- Daniel

> Have fun!
> 
> - Sedat -
> 
> On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 8:30 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Thomas,
>>
>> I read your original LKML posting in [1].
>>
>> [ QUOTE ]
>> Currently, Daniel Lezcano seems to be working on an intrusive change of not
>> using the power_usage value at all for choosing a C-state:
>>
>> [4] https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/14/155
>>
>> As I could not find any of these patches in any git trees to be merged for
>> 3.8...
>> [ /QUOTE ]
>>
>> You can find the patches at LKML ([2] and [3]) or patchwork ([4] and [5]).
>>
>> As a Linux-Next "customer" I know about Daniel's work for-next [5] but
>> I did not found any other GIT repository of him.
>> Striving through Daniel's other GIT repos I found idlestat [6] and
>> powerdebug [7] tools which I want to test.
>> ( So, thank you for your email! )
>>
>> Have fun!
>>
>> Regards,
>> - Sedat -
>>
>> [0] http://marc.info/?l=linux-acpi&m=135808048905350&w=2
>> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/14/153
>> [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/14/149
>> [3] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1878691/
>> [4] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1878701/
>> [5] http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=people/dlezcano/cpuidle-next.git
>> [6] http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=people/dlezcano/idlestat.git;a=summary
>> [7] http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=people/dlezcano/powerdebug.git;a=summary


-- 
 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog


  reply	other threads:[~2013-01-13 20:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-13 19:30 [PATCH] cpuidle: fix new C-states not functional after AC disconnect Sedat Dilek
2013-01-13 20:36 ` Sedat Dilek
2013-01-13 20:44   ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2013-01-13 20:44     ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-01-13 20:49     ` Sedat Dilek
2013-01-30 20:23     ` Thomas Schlichter
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-01-13 12:34 Thomas Schlichter
2013-01-13 14:41 ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-01-13 14:41   ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-01-13 20:04   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-18 20:34     ` Thomas Schlichter
2013-01-18 22:24       ` Thomas Schlichter
2013-01-31  3:52     ` Julius Werner
2013-01-31 13:21       ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50F31CB9.4010905@linaro.org \
    --to=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=sedat.dilek@gmail.com \
    --cc=thomas.schlichter@web.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.