Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for 1.4 0/4] Simplify Makefile.objs some more

["Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>]

Am 19.01.2013 23:06, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
> Il 19/01/2013 19:11, Andreas Färber ha scritto:
>>>> The patches are mostly mechanical substitutions, and there is no
>>>> user-visible change---neither in total build time, nor in the files that
>>>> are linked into the executables.
>> Without having tested this yet I want to remind that it is necessary for
>> qom/cpu.c to be built twice
> 
> Hmm, it's not anymore actually (since libuser was removed).  It hasn't
> been built twice for a month and apparently nothing broke.

I surely didn't ack that. Have you actually tested linux-user to verify
it works? It might lead to unexpected CPUState field accesses.

>> , to not run into similar issues like
>> util/oslib-posix.c.
> 
> The only dependency is
> 
> #if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
>     int kvm_fd;
>     bool kvm_vcpu_dirty;
> #endif
>     struct KVMState *kvm_state;
>     struct kvm_run *kvm_run;
> 
> Plenty of other fields are meaningless for !CONFIG_USER_ONLY but are
> unconditionally present in struct CPUState.  Given this inconsistency,
> why is it still useful to build it twice?

You are judging based on master. I have some more code movements queued
(qom-cpu-8) and I believe it was Anthony who insisted on suppressing
those unneeded user-only fields even if they were unconditional in
CPU_COMMON before.

qom/cpu.c is not intended to remain so small forever - any cpu_* code
that does not depend on CPUArchState can find a new home there.
cpu_interrupt() is being moved to qom/cpu.h and cpu_reset_interrupt() to
qom/cpu.c for instance. And I'm working on refactoring CPU VMState, that
either requires #ifdef'ery or lots of new stubs beyond what Eduardo added.

Andreas

-- 
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg