Advanced Deinterlacers

Advanced Deinterlacers

[Mario Schulz]

Developers,

As far as I have seen you have successfully implementeted the API
technology to select interlacers in the video pipeline as video
postprocessor since middle of last year.

The VDR community is still waiting for MotionAdaptive or MotionCompensated.

Could you comment on your schedule for that?
- Is it for some reason technologically impossible to get it implemented?
- Are the plans for IVB or SBR to make it available?

Best regards

- Mario

$ ./vaapi-vpp
libva info: VA-API version 0.34.0
libva info: va_getDriverName() returns 0
libva info: Trying to open /usr/local/lib/dri/i965_drv_video.so
libva info: Found init function __vaDriverInit_0_34
libva info: va_openDriver() returns 0
video/vaapi: libva 0.34 (Intel i965 driver - 1.0.16.pre1) initialized
Maximum VAProfiles: 11
Maximum VAProcFilterCount: 8
Maximum VAProcDeinterlacingCount: 5
Profiles available: 10
 1: VAProfileMPEG2Simple
 2: VAProfileMPEG2Main
 3: VAProfileH264Baseline
 4: VAProfileH264Main
 5: VAProfileH264High
 6: VAProfileVC1Simple
 7: VAProfileVC1Main
 8: VAProfileVC1Advanced
 9: VAProfileNone
10: VAProfileJPEGBaseline
postproc: video postprocessor available
postproc returned 2 filters
postproc returned 1 denoisers
postproc returned 1 interlacers
postproc filter 0 is noise reduction
postproc filter 1 is deinterlacer
postproc deinterlacer 0 is bob

Re: Advanced Deinterlacers

[Jochen Heuer]

Hello,

> As far as I have seen you have successfully implementeted the API
> technology to select interlacers in the video pipeline as video
> postprocessor since middle of last year.
> 
> The VDR community is still waiting for MotionAdaptive or MotionCompensated.
> 
> Could you comment on your schedule for that?
> - Is it for some reason technologically impossible to get it implemented?
> - Are the plans for IVB or SBR to make it available?

I am very interested in this also since I probably have to replace my old VDR
in the near future and I need to know if I have to go the NVidia route because
of working VDPAU support for advanced deinterlacers (although I would not like
it since it's closed source) or if I can expect working advanced deinterlacers
in the near future in the Intel stack. Because I would prefer to go the Intel
route instead.

Thanks and best regards,

   Jogi