From: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
To: balbi@ti.com
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, khilman@deeprootsystems.com,
paul@pwsan.com, tony@atomide.com, sourav.poddar@ti.com,
vaibhav.bedia@ti.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH 1/2] ARM: OMAP2+: hwmod-data: UART IP needs software control of sidle modes
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 18:26:28 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <511E307C.8010600@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130215125055.GA16558@arwen.pp.htv.fi>
On Friday 15 February 2013 06:20 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 05:38:26PM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>> OMAP UART IP needs manual idle modes based on state of the
>> IP. Currently this is handled by the driver with function pointers
>> implemented in platform code.
>>
>> This however breaks in case of device tree because of missing
>> idle handling. With the provided flags, idle mode handling is transparently
>> handled by runtime time pm code.
>
> this last sentence can be improved a bit.
>
Indeed.
Regards,
Santosh
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: santosh.shilimkar@ti.com (Santosh Shilimkar)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC/RFT PATCH 1/2] ARM: OMAP2+: hwmod-data: UART IP needs software control of sidle modes
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 18:26:28 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <511E307C.8010600@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130215125055.GA16558@arwen.pp.htv.fi>
On Friday 15 February 2013 06:20 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 05:38:26PM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>> OMAP UART IP needs manual idle modes based on state of the
>> IP. Currently this is handled by the driver with function pointers
>> implemented in platform code.
>>
>> This however breaks in case of device tree because of missing
>> idle handling. With the provided flags, idle mode handling is transparently
>> handled by runtime time pm code.
>
> this last sentence can be improved a bit.
>
Indeed.
Regards,
Santosh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-15 12:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-15 12:08 [RFC/RFT PATCH 1/2] ARM: OMAP2+: hwmod-data: UART IP needs software control of sidle modes Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-15 12:08 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-15 12:50 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-15 12:50 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-15 12:56 ` Santosh Shilimkar [this message]
2013-02-15 12:56 ` Santosh Shilimkar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=511E307C.8010600@ti.com \
--to=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
--cc=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
--cc=rnayak@ti.com \
--cc=sourav.poddar@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=vaibhav.bedia@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.