From: Michael Wang <wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
alex.shi@intel.com, Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>,
"Nikunj A. Dadhania" <nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 0/3] sched: simplify the select_task_rq_fair()
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 14:06:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51270AD9.9020908@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1361509697.5817.65.camel@marge.simpson.net>
On 02/22/2013 01:08 PM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 10:37 +0800, Michael Wang wrote:
>
>> According to the testing result, I could not agree this purpose of
>> wake_affine() benefit us, but I'm sure that wake_affine() is a terrible
>> performance killer when system is busy.
>
> (hm, result is singular.. pgbench in 1:N mode only?)
I'm not sure about how pgbench implemented, all I know is it will create
several instance and access the database, I suppose no different from
several threads access database (1 server and N clients?).
There are improvement since when system busy, wake_affine() will be skipped.
And in old world, when system is busy, wake_affine() will only be
skipped if prev_cpu and curr_cpu belong to different nodes.
Regards,
Michael Wang
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-22 6:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-29 9:08 [RFC PATCH v3 0/3] sched: simplify the select_task_rq_fair() Michael Wang
2013-01-29 9:09 ` [RFC PATCH v3 1/3] sched: schedule balance map foundation Michael Wang
2013-02-20 13:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-02-21 4:52 ` Michael Wang
2013-02-20 13:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-02-21 4:58 ` Michael Wang
2013-02-21 11:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-02-22 2:53 ` Michael Wang
2013-02-22 3:33 ` Alex Shi
2013-02-22 4:19 ` Michael Wang
2013-02-22 4:46 ` Alex Shi
2013-02-22 5:05 ` Michael Wang
2013-01-29 9:09 ` [RFC PATCH v3 2/3] sched: build schedule balance map Michael Wang
2013-01-29 9:10 ` [RFC PATCH v3 3/3] sched: simplify select_task_rq_fair() with " Michael Wang
2013-02-18 5:52 ` [RFC PATCH v3 0/3] sched: simplify the select_task_rq_fair() Michael Wang
2013-02-20 10:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-02-20 13:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-02-20 14:05 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-02-21 5:21 ` Michael Wang
2013-02-21 5:14 ` Michael Wang
2013-02-21 4:51 ` Michael Wang
2013-02-21 6:11 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-02-21 7:00 ` Michael Wang
2013-02-21 8:10 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-02-21 9:08 ` Michael Wang
2013-02-21 9:43 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-02-22 2:36 ` Michael Wang
2013-02-22 5:02 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-02-22 5:26 ` Michael Wang
2013-02-22 6:13 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-02-22 6:42 ` Michael Wang
2013-02-22 8:17 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-02-22 8:35 ` Michael Wang
2013-02-22 8:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-02-22 9:10 ` Michael Wang
2013-02-22 9:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-02-22 9:58 ` Michael Wang
2013-02-21 9:20 ` Michael Wang
2013-02-21 10:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-02-22 2:37 ` Michael Wang
2013-02-22 5:08 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-02-22 6:06 ` Michael Wang [this message]
2013-02-22 6:19 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-02-22 8:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-02-22 9:11 ` Michael Wang
2013-02-22 9:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-02-22 10:08 ` Michael Wang
2013-02-22 9:40 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-02-22 9:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-02-22 10:01 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-02-22 12:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-02-22 12:35 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-02-22 13:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-02-22 14:30 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-02-22 14:42 ` Mike Galbraith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51270AD9.9020908@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex.shi@intel.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.