From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>,
peter.maydell@linaro.org,
Peter Crosthwaite <peter.crosthwaite@xilinx.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 2/4] bitops: Add UInt32StateInfo and helper functions
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2013 15:17:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5135FE69.4040104@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130305133401.GD2256@redhat.com>
Hi,
>>>> We also need uint8_t, uint16_t and uint64_t versions for some devices.
>>>> Perhaps it would be better to implement a uint64_t device which can be
>>>> used with shorter widths or even stronger connection with memory API.
>>>
>>> Why not uint8_t for everyone?
>>
>> That would be simple, but then modeling for example 32 bit registers
>> gets clumsy.
>
> The way we do this in pci is support wrappers for word/long accesses.
> This is a nice way to do endian-ness conversion anyway, I guess.
> If people are interested, it shouldn't be hard to generalize the pci code...
> At least with PCI, guest can perform a long access and host word access
> to the same register, so width is not a register property.
Thanks, but I'm not interested.
Memory API handles this just fine for me, and there is zero reason to
care about how the guests accesses the registers (unless the hardware
you are emulating behaves strange enough that you have to care to get it
right).
cheers,
Gerd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-05 14:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-03 6:13 [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 0/4] Data Driven device registers & Zynq DEVCFG Peter Crosthwaite
2013-03-03 6:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 1/4] qemu-log: Allow checking of the current mask Peter Crosthwaite
2013-03-03 10:32 ` Peter Maydell
2013-03-03 6:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 2/4] bitops: Add UInt32StateInfo and helper functions Peter Crosthwaite
2013-03-03 9:01 ` Blue Swirl
2013-03-04 1:37 ` Peter Crosthwaite
2013-03-04 7:28 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2013-03-04 20:44 ` Blue Swirl
2013-03-04 9:44 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-03-04 20:52 ` Blue Swirl
2013-03-05 13:34 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-03-05 14:17 ` Gerd Hoffmann [this message]
2013-03-05 14:32 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-03-07 2:00 ` Peter Crosthwaite
2013-03-07 2:26 ` Peter Maydell
2013-03-09 9:41 ` Blue Swirl
2013-03-04 6:55 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2013-03-04 7:20 ` Peter Crosthwaite
2013-03-04 7:30 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2013-03-03 6:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 3/4] xilinx_zynq: devcfg device model Peter Crosthwaite
2013-03-03 6:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 4/4] zynq: added devcfg to machine model Peter Crosthwaite
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5135FE69.4040104@redhat.com \
--to=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=blauwirbel@gmail.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.crosthwaite@xilinx.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.