All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: aliguori@us.ibm.com, dwmw2@infradead.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] hw: correctly implement soft reset
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2013 19:32:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51363A2B.6090808@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1362495898-15352-4-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>

comments in-line

On 03/05/13 16:04, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Do not do a hard reset for port 92h, keyboard controller, or cf9h soft reset.
> These only reset the CPU.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> ---
>  hw/lpc_ich9.c | 7 ++++++-
>  hw/pc.c       | 3 ++-
>  hw/pckbd.c    | 5 +++--
>  hw/piix_pci.c | 8 ++++++--
>  4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/lpc_ich9.c b/hw/lpc_ich9.c
> index eceb052..fae31df 100644
> --- a/hw/lpc_ich9.c
> +++ b/hw/lpc_ich9.c
> @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@
>  #include "pci/pci_bus.h"
>  #include "exec/address-spaces.h"
>  #include "sysemu/sysemu.h"
> +#include "sysemu/cpus.h"
>  
>  static int ich9_lpc_sci_irq(ICH9LPCState *lpc);
>  
> @@ -506,7 +507,11 @@ static void ich9_rst_cnt_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, uint64_t val,
>      ICH9LPCState *lpc = opaque;
>  
>      if (val & 4) {
> -        qemu_system_reset_request();
> +        if (val & 0xA) {
> +            qemu_system_reset_request();
> +        } else {
> +            cpu_soft_reset();
> +        }
>          return;
>      }
>      lpc->rst_cnt = val & 0xA; /* keep FULL_RST (bit 3) and SYS_RST (bit 1) */

So any of FULL_RST and SYS_RST render it hard.


> diff --git a/hw/pc.c b/hw/pc.c
> index 523db1f..6080d62 100644
> --- a/hw/pc.c
> +++ b/hw/pc.c
> @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@
>  #include "kvm_i386.h"
>  #include "xen.h"
>  #include "sysemu/blockdev.h"
> +#include "sysemu/cpus.h"
>  #include "hw/block-common.h"
>  #include "ui/qemu-spice.h"
>  #include "exec/memory.h"
> @@ -441,7 +442,7 @@ static void port92_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, uint64_t val,
>      s->outport = val;
>      qemu_set_irq(*s->a20_out, (val >> 1) & 1);
>      if ((val & 1) && !(oldval & 1)) {
> -        qemu_system_reset_request();
> +        cpu_soft_reset();
>      }
>  }

I checked this against the data-sheet, OK.

>  
> diff --git a/hw/pckbd.c b/hw/pckbd.c
> index 3bad09b..fd66788 100644
> --- a/hw/pckbd.c
> +++ b/hw/pckbd.c
> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
>  #include "pc.h"
>  #include "ps2.h"
>  #include "sysemu/sysemu.h"
> +#include "sysemu/cpus.h"
>  
>  /* debug PC keyboard */
>  //#define DEBUG_KBD
> @@ -220,7 +221,7 @@ static void outport_write(KBDState *s, uint32_t val)
>          qemu_set_irq(*s->a20_out, (val >> 1) & 1);
>      }
>      if (!(val & 1)) {
> -        qemu_system_reset_request();
> +        cpu_soft_reset();
>      }
>  }
>  
> @@ -299,7 +300,7 @@ static void kbd_write_command(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
>          s->outport &= ~KBD_OUT_A20;
>          break;
>      case KBD_CCMD_RESET:
> -        qemu_system_reset_request();
> +        cpu_soft_reset();
>          break;
>      case KBD_CCMD_NO_OP:
>          /* ignore that */

I couldn't find the datasheet for this, but
<http://wiki.osdev.org/%228042%22_PS/2_Controller> seems to confirm that
both of these should trigger a reset. Not sure about hard vs. soft.

> diff --git a/hw/piix_pci.c b/hw/piix_pci.c
> index 6c77e49..785e0a7 100644
> --- a/hw/piix_pci.c
> +++ b/hw/piix_pci.c
> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
>  #include "xen.h"
>  #include "pam.h"
>  #include "sysemu/sysemu.h"
> +#include "sysemu/cpus.h"
>  
>  /*
>   * I440FX chipset data sheet.
> @@ -521,8 +522,11 @@ static void rcr_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, uint64_t val, unsigned len)
>      PIIX3State *d = opaque;
>  
>      if (val & 4) {
> -        qemu_system_reset_request();
> -        return;
> +        if (val & 2) {
> +            qemu_system_reset_request();
> +        } else {
> +            cpu_soft_reset();
> +        }
>      }
>      d->rcr = val & 2; /* keep System Reset type only */
>  }
> 

This is slightly different from your ICH9 change at the top: you remove
the "return" statement only here. For a hard reset it doesn't matter,
but in case of a soft reset, PIIX3State.rcr will updated in a
guest-visible way, while ICH9LPCState.rst_cnt won't be updated at all.

I guess we should unify these by dropping the "return" from
ich9_rst_cnt_write() -- the other bits changed simultaneously when
kicking the Reset CPU bit should be visible after a soft reset, I think.

Laszlo

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-03-05 18:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-05 15:04 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] Implement x86 soft reset Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-05 15:04 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] cpu: make CPU_INTERRUPT_RESET available on all targets Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-05 15:38   ` Anthony Liguori
2013-03-05 16:10     ` Andreas Färber
2013-03-05 16:17       ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-05 18:00   ` Laszlo Ersek
2013-03-05 15:04 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] pc: port 92 reset requires a low->high transition Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-05 17:20   ` Anthony Liguori
2013-03-05 18:05   ` Laszlo Ersek
2013-03-05 15:04 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] hw: correctly implement soft reset Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-05 17:18   ` Anthony Liguori
2013-03-05 17:22   ` David Woodhouse
2013-03-05 17:43     ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-05 18:32   ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2013-03-05 15:51 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] Implement x86 " David Woodhouse
2013-03-05 16:00   ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-05 16:13     ` Andreas Färber
2013-03-05 16:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/3] wakeup: only reset the CPU Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-05 16:59   ` David Woodhouse
2013-03-05 17:10     ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-05 17:26       ` Peter Stuge
2013-03-05 17:42         ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-05 19:12     ` Laszlo Ersek
2013-03-05 19:25       ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-05 19:51         ` Laszlo Ersek
2013-03-06  1:45     ` Kevin O'Connor
2013-03-06  8:32       ` David Woodhouse

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51363A2B.6090808@redhat.com \
    --to=lersek@redhat.com \
    --cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.