From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org,
Stuart Yoder <stuart.yoder@freescale.com>,
Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: in-kernel interrupt controller steering
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 14:12:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51374ED8.7010701@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8A2E7B22-8933-42CF-AD7D-6AC27F1E4B1F@suse.de>
Il 06/03/2013 15:03, Alexander Graf ha scritto:
> KVM_IRQ_LINE is basically an IOAPIC interrupt line assert. That's
> fine. That ioctl should get an ioapic device handle to work on.
It would be a KVM_SET_DEVICE_ATTR in your case, right?
> Whether we call the IOAPIC PINs GSIs or something different is really
> just a naming question. I'd probably call it IRQ number :).
Yup.
> So again, I'm failing to see where we think differently :).
I think we're not, just making sure that the existing x86 ioctls can be
clearly mapping to what you're proposed.
The only change that came up is the rename of KVM_CREATE_IRQCHIP_ARGS,
and the addition of a "none" type. Everything else is just clarifying
the desired semantics (and Gleb correcting me on several accounts---I
hope I haven't caused more confusion).
Paolo
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org,
Stuart Yoder <stuart.yoder@freescale.com>,
Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: in-kernel interrupt controller steering
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 15:12:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51374ED8.7010701@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8A2E7B22-8933-42CF-AD7D-6AC27F1E4B1F@suse.de>
Il 06/03/2013 15:03, Alexander Graf ha scritto:
> KVM_IRQ_LINE is basically an IOAPIC interrupt line assert. That's
> fine. That ioctl should get an ioapic device handle to work on.
It would be a KVM_SET_DEVICE_ATTR in your case, right?
> Whether we call the IOAPIC PINs GSIs or something different is really
> just a naming question. I'd probably call it IRQ number :).
Yup.
> So again, I'm failing to see where we think differently :).
I think we're not, just making sure that the existing x86 ioctls can be
clearly mapping to what you're proposed.
The only change that came up is the rename of KVM_CREATE_IRQCHIP_ARGS,
and the addition of a "none" type. Everything else is just clarifying
the desired semantics (and Gleb correcting me on several accounts---I
hope I haven't caused more confusion).
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-06 14:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 94+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-04 22:20 in-kernel interrupt controller steering Alexander Graf
2013-03-04 22:20 ` Alexander Graf
2013-03-05 0:59 ` Scott Wood
2013-03-05 0:59 ` Scott Wood
2013-03-05 5:44 ` Paul Mackerras
2013-03-05 5:44 ` Paul Mackerras
2013-03-05 15:25 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-05 15:25 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-06 9:40 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-06 9:40 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-06 9:58 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-06 9:58 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-06 10:04 ` Alexander Graf
2013-03-06 10:04 ` Alexander Graf
2013-03-06 10:12 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-06 10:12 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-06 10:38 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-06 10:38 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-06 10:38 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-06 10:38 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-06 11:26 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-06 11:26 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-06 11:44 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-06 11:44 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-06 11:46 ` Alexander Graf
2013-03-06 11:46 ` Alexander Graf
2013-03-06 11:59 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-06 11:59 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-06 12:02 ` Alexander Graf
2013-03-06 12:02 ` Alexander Graf
2013-03-06 12:14 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-06 12:14 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-06 12:20 ` Alexander Graf
2013-03-06 12:20 ` Alexander Graf
2013-03-06 12:28 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-06 12:28 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-06 13:14 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-06 13:14 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-06 13:22 ` Alexander Graf
2013-03-06 13:22 ` Alexander Graf
2013-03-06 13:56 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-06 13:56 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-06 14:03 ` Alexander Graf
2013-03-06 14:03 ` Alexander Graf
2013-03-06 14:12 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2013-03-06 14:12 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-06 14:30 ` Alexander Graf
2013-03-06 14:30 ` Alexander Graf
2013-03-06 14:37 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-06 14:37 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-06 14:40 ` Alexander Graf
2013-03-06 14:40 ` Alexander Graf
2013-03-06 14:41 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-06 14:41 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-06 14:48 ` Alexander Graf
2013-03-06 14:48 ` Alexander Graf
2013-03-06 14:59 ` Alexander Graf
2013-03-06 14:59 ` Alexander Graf
2013-03-06 15:02 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-06 15:02 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-06 15:30 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-06 15:30 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-06 16:33 ` Alexander Graf
2013-03-06 16:33 ` Alexander Graf
2013-03-07 0:32 ` Paul Mackerras
2013-03-07 0:32 ` Paul Mackerras
2013-03-07 7:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-07 7:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-06 13:41 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-06 13:41 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-06 14:11 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-06 14:11 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-06 14:31 ` Alexander Graf
2013-03-06 14:31 ` Alexander Graf
2013-03-06 18:46 ` Peter Maydell
2013-03-06 18:46 ` Peter Maydell
2013-03-06 19:20 ` Alexander Graf
2013-03-06 19:20 ` Alexander Graf
2013-03-06 11:44 ` Alexander Graf
2013-03-06 11:44 ` Alexander Graf
2013-03-06 11:46 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-06 11:46 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-06 11:47 ` Alexander Graf
2013-03-06 11:47 ` Alexander Graf
2013-03-06 11:57 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-06 11:57 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-06 11:58 ` Alexander Graf
2013-03-06 11:58 ` Alexander Graf
2013-03-06 13:16 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-06 13:16 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-06 0:23 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-03-06 0:23 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-03-06 0:33 ` Alexander Graf
2013-03-06 0:33 ` Alexander Graf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51374ED8.7010701@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
--cc=stuart.yoder@freescale.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.