Re: mmap vs fs cache

[Chris Friesen <chris.friesen@genband.com>]

On 03/08/2013 09:00 AM, Howard Chu wrote:

> First obvious conclusion - kswapd is being too aggressive. When free
> memory hits the low watermark, the reclaim shrinks slapd down from 25GB
> to 18-19GB, while the page cache still contains ~7GB of unmapped pages.
> Ideally I'd like a tuning knob so I can say to keep no more than 2GB of
> unmapped pages in the cache. (And the desired effect of that would be to
> allow user processes to grow to 30GB total, in this case.)
>
> I mentioned this "unmapped page cache control" post already
> http://lwn.net/Articles/436010/ but it seems that the idea was
> ultimately rejected. Is there anything else similar in current kernels?

Sorry, I'm not aware of anything.  I'm not a filesystem/vm guy though, 
so maybe there's something I don't know about.

I would have expected both posix_madvise(..POSIX_MADV_RANDOM) and 
swappiness to help, but it doesn't sound like they're working.

Chris

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>