Re: [PATCH] ARM: smp: Allow real broadcast device selection instead of always dummy

[Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>]

On Wednesday 13 March 2013 05:55 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 11:24:01AM +0000, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>> On Wednesday 13 March 2013 03:46 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
>>> Hi Santosh,

[..]

>>>
>>> Is the problem that the dummy timer is being registered as the broadcast
>>> source, or that it is selected as a local timer in preference of real timers?
>>>
>> Dummy timer is preferred over real broadcast timer.
> 
> Ok.
> 
>>  
>>> If it is the former, Then I believe my patch solve the issue more generally -
>>> if you happen to register a dummy timer before other timers, it will become the
>>> broadcast source. Regardless of how temporary this is, it should never happen,
>>> and lowering the rating of the dummy won't fix this.
>>>
>> Well by the time we need active broadcast functionality, clock-events are
>> already chosen if the ratings are appropriate.
> 
> That's a fair point. I still think it's worth having the check in the core
> broadcast code - rejecting dummy timers is always a sensible thing to do, and
> it prevents future crashes if new timers are added without sensible rating
> values.
> 
>>
>>> If it is the latter, then this patch would ensure that a real timer with a
>>> rating over 100 is selected in preference to the dummy, which is certainly what
>>> we want. The proposed generic dummy timer in Stephen Boyd's local timer API
>>> removal series [1] similarly uses a low rating to ensure that real timers are
>>> selected in preference to an always-registered dummy. I note that the
>>> architected timer has a higher rating (450) than the dummy (400), so this
>>> shouldn't currently be a problem.
>>>
>> Because we always register dummy broadcast on ARM now 
>> and with higher rating, it is picked as broadcast source. We definitely don't
>> want such a behavior when we have real broadcast device is available.
> 
> Agreed. We *never* want to pick a dummy timer as a broadcast source, as this
> never makes sense.
> 
>> With your patch, we are trying to avoid the registration which goes
>> against the the whole idea of registering it always and picking
>> the right clock-event based on rating by clock-event core.
>> The clock-event core except the proper ratings to be provided based on
>> the capability of the timer source and its resolution and in that case
>> dummy should have the lowest rating which is what I tried to patch.
>>
>>> Have I missed something?
>>>
>> Not much. I was just looking at x86 code as well after your email
>> to see how the LAPIC issue is handled. They seems to also have
>> correct rating to take care of the selection.
>>
>> Probably we can merge both the fixes but from clock-event core
>> code perspective, the ratings fix is more than enough.
> 
> I do agree it'd be worth lowering the dummy timer's rating to ensure it doesn't
> override a real timer elsewhere. 
> 
Yep. Can I add you acked-by tag then for $subject patch ?
Would be good to get this one merged as well.

Regards
Santosh