From: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: smp: Allow real broadcast device selection instead of always dummy
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 16:16:06 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5141AA6E.3020805@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130314102807.GG13483@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
On Thursday 14 March 2013 03:58 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 07:45:14AM +0000, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>> On Wednesday 13 March 2013 09:48 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 03:44:03PM +0000, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>>>> On Wednesday 13 March 2013 05:55 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 11:24:01AM +0000, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>>>>>> On Wednesday 13 March 2013 03:46 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi Santosh,
>>>>
>>>> [..]
>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is the problem that the dummy timer is being registered as the broadcast
>>>>>>> source, or that it is selected as a local timer in preference of real timers?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dummy timer is preferred over real broadcast timer.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ok.
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>>> I do agree it'd be worth lowering the dummy timer's rating to ensure it doesn't
>>>>> override a real timer elsewhere.
>>>>>
>>>> Yep. Can I add you acked-by tag then for $subject patch ?
>>>> Would be good to get this one merged as well.
>>>
>>> Sure. Though could you reword the commit message? The patch solves the more
>>> general issue of a dummy being preferred over real hardware even outside of
>>> choosing the broadcast device.
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
>>
>> Thanks. For record, patch is in end of the email which I plan
>> to put into patch system.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Santosh
>
> The below patch seems fine. Are you intending for this to go in as a fix for
> 3.9-rc*, or as a cleanup for 3.10?
>
Fix for 3.9-rc*. I have put already it in patch system.
Regards,
Santosh
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: santosh.shilimkar@ti.com (Santosh Shilimkar)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: smp: Allow real broadcast device selection instead of always dummy
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 16:16:06 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5141AA6E.3020805@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130314102807.GG13483@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
On Thursday 14 March 2013 03:58 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 07:45:14AM +0000, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>> On Wednesday 13 March 2013 09:48 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 03:44:03PM +0000, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>>>> On Wednesday 13 March 2013 05:55 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 11:24:01AM +0000, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>>>>>> On Wednesday 13 March 2013 03:46 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi Santosh,
>>>>
>>>> [..]
>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is the problem that the dummy timer is being registered as the broadcast
>>>>>>> source, or that it is selected as a local timer in preference of real timers?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dummy timer is preferred over real broadcast timer.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ok.
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>>> I do agree it'd be worth lowering the dummy timer's rating to ensure it doesn't
>>>>> override a real timer elsewhere.
>>>>>
>>>> Yep. Can I add you acked-by tag then for $subject patch ?
>>>> Would be good to get this one merged as well.
>>>
>>> Sure. Though could you reword the commit message? The patch solves the more
>>> general issue of a dummy being preferred over real hardware even outside of
>>> choosing the broadcast device.
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
>>
>> Thanks. For record, patch is in end of the email which I plan
>> to put into patch system.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Santosh
>
> The below patch seems fine. Are you intending for this to go in as a fix for
> 3.9-rc*, or as a cleanup for 3.10?
>
Fix for 3.9-rc*. I have put already it in patch system.
Regards,
Santosh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-14 10:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-13 9:06 [PATCH] ARM: smp: Allow real broadcast device selection instead of always dummy Santosh Shilimkar
2013-03-13 9:06 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-03-13 9:28 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-03-13 9:28 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-03-13 10:16 ` Mark Rutland
2013-03-13 10:16 ` Mark Rutland
2013-03-13 11:24 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-03-13 11:24 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-03-13 12:25 ` Mark Rutland
2013-03-13 12:25 ` Mark Rutland
2013-03-13 15:44 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-03-13 15:44 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-03-13 16:18 ` Mark Rutland
2013-03-13 16:18 ` Mark Rutland
2013-03-14 7:45 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-03-14 7:45 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-03-14 8:50 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-03-14 8:50 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-03-14 10:28 ` Mark Rutland
2013-03-14 10:28 ` Mark Rutland
2013-03-14 10:46 ` Santosh Shilimkar [this message]
2013-03-14 10:46 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-03-14 19:41 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-03-14 19:41 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-03-13 14:19 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-03-13 14:19 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-03-13 15:37 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-03-13 15:37 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-03-13 18:31 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-03-13 18:31 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-03-14 6:09 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-03-14 6:09 ` Santosh Shilimkar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5141AA6E.3020805@ti.com \
--to=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.