From: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
To: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
Cc: tony@atomide.com, b-cousson@ti.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk,
balbi@ti.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] ARM: OMAP4: clock: Add device tree support for AUXCLKs
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 19:34:51 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <514B1383.1070102@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <514B10FE.1000805@ti.com>
On Thursday 21 March 2013 07:24 PM, Roger Quadros wrote:
> On 03/21/2013 03:08 PM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
>> []..
>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-generic.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-generic.c
>>> index 0274ff7..23f2064 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-generic.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-generic.c
>>> @@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ DT_MACHINE_START(OMAP4_DT, "Generic OMAP4 (Flattened Device Tree)")
>>> .init_irq = omap_gic_of_init,
>>> .init_machine = omap_generic_init,
>>> .init_late = omap4430_init_late,
>>> - .init_time = omap4_local_timer_init,
>>> + .init_time = omap4_init_time,
>>> .dt_compat = omap4_boards_compat,
>>> .restart = omap44xx_restart,
>>> MACHINE_END
>>
>> []..
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
>>> +int __init omap4_clk_init_dt(void)
>>> +{
>>> + struct device_node *np;
>>> +
>>> + np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "ti,omap4-scrm");
>>> + if (np) {
>>> + scrm_data.clks = scrm_clks;
>>> + scrm_data.clk_num = ARRAY_SIZE(scrm_clks);
>>> + of_clk_add_provider(np, of_clk_src_onecell_get, &scrm_data);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>
>> []..
>>> +
>>> +void __init omap4_init_time(void)
>>> +{
>>> + omap4_clk_init_dt();
>>> + omap4_local_timer_init();
>>> +}
>>
>> I guess you did all this because of_clk_add_provider() needs
>> slab to be initialized. With the below patch[1], now clk inits
>> happen within .init_timer already, so none of this would
>> be needed.
>>
>> [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg231288.html
>>
>
> Right. I can then call omap4_clk_init_dt() from within omap4xxx_clk_init().
>
> Any comments about the main subject? Does the approach look fine?
It looks fine, except for the fact that I was wondering if the clock
provider needs to restrict itself to SCRM.
Nishant Menon brought up a need for specifying the mpu clock source
from within DT, to be able to use a generic cpufreq driver.
It could be a provider (not specific to scrm, but having only scrm
clocks for now) which we could add clocks as and when we see a need for
them to be specified from DT.
Btw, you need to copy Paul Walmsley for any clock related patches as
he is the OMAP clock maintainer.
>
> cheers,
> -roger
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: rnayak@ti.com (Rajendra Nayak)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] ARM: OMAP4: clock: Add device tree support for AUXCLKs
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 19:34:51 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <514B1383.1070102@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <514B10FE.1000805@ti.com>
On Thursday 21 March 2013 07:24 PM, Roger Quadros wrote:
> On 03/21/2013 03:08 PM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
>> []..
>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-generic.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-generic.c
>>> index 0274ff7..23f2064 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-generic.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-generic.c
>>> @@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ DT_MACHINE_START(OMAP4_DT, "Generic OMAP4 (Flattened Device Tree)")
>>> .init_irq = omap_gic_of_init,
>>> .init_machine = omap_generic_init,
>>> .init_late = omap4430_init_late,
>>> - .init_time = omap4_local_timer_init,
>>> + .init_time = omap4_init_time,
>>> .dt_compat = omap4_boards_compat,
>>> .restart = omap44xx_restart,
>>> MACHINE_END
>>
>> []..
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
>>> +int __init omap4_clk_init_dt(void)
>>> +{
>>> + struct device_node *np;
>>> +
>>> + np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "ti,omap4-scrm");
>>> + if (np) {
>>> + scrm_data.clks = scrm_clks;
>>> + scrm_data.clk_num = ARRAY_SIZE(scrm_clks);
>>> + of_clk_add_provider(np, of_clk_src_onecell_get, &scrm_data);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>
>> []..
>>> +
>>> +void __init omap4_init_time(void)
>>> +{
>>> + omap4_clk_init_dt();
>>> + omap4_local_timer_init();
>>> +}
>>
>> I guess you did all this because of_clk_add_provider() needs
>> slab to be initialized. With the below patch[1], now clk inits
>> happen within .init_timer already, so none of this would
>> be needed.
>>
>> [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg231288.html
>>
>
> Right. I can then call omap4_clk_init_dt() from within omap4xxx_clk_init().
>
> Any comments about the main subject? Does the approach look fine?
It looks fine, except for the fact that I was wondering if the clock
provider needs to restrict itself to SCRM.
Nishant Menon brought up a need for specifying the mpu clock source
from within DT, to be able to use a generic cpufreq driver.
It could be a provider (not specific to scrm, but having only scrm
clocks for now) which we could add clocks as and when we see a need for
them to be specified from DT.
Btw, you need to copy Paul Walmsley for any clock related patches as
he is the OMAP clock maintainer.
>
> cheers,
> -roger
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
To: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
Cc: <tony@atomide.com>, <b-cousson@ti.com>, <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
<balbi@ti.com>, <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
<devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] ARM: OMAP4: clock: Add device tree support for AUXCLKs
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 19:34:51 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <514B1383.1070102@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <514B10FE.1000805@ti.com>
On Thursday 21 March 2013 07:24 PM, Roger Quadros wrote:
> On 03/21/2013 03:08 PM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
>> []..
>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-generic.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-generic.c
>>> index 0274ff7..23f2064 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-generic.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-generic.c
>>> @@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ DT_MACHINE_START(OMAP4_DT, "Generic OMAP4 (Flattened Device Tree)")
>>> .init_irq = omap_gic_of_init,
>>> .init_machine = omap_generic_init,
>>> .init_late = omap4430_init_late,
>>> - .init_time = omap4_local_timer_init,
>>> + .init_time = omap4_init_time,
>>> .dt_compat = omap4_boards_compat,
>>> .restart = omap44xx_restart,
>>> MACHINE_END
>>
>> []..
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
>>> +int __init omap4_clk_init_dt(void)
>>> +{
>>> + struct device_node *np;
>>> +
>>> + np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "ti,omap4-scrm");
>>> + if (np) {
>>> + scrm_data.clks = scrm_clks;
>>> + scrm_data.clk_num = ARRAY_SIZE(scrm_clks);
>>> + of_clk_add_provider(np, of_clk_src_onecell_get, &scrm_data);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>
>> []..
>>> +
>>> +void __init omap4_init_time(void)
>>> +{
>>> + omap4_clk_init_dt();
>>> + omap4_local_timer_init();
>>> +}
>>
>> I guess you did all this because of_clk_add_provider() needs
>> slab to be initialized. With the below patch[1], now clk inits
>> happen within .init_timer already, so none of this would
>> be needed.
>>
>> [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg231288.html
>>
>
> Right. I can then call omap4_clk_init_dt() from within omap4xxx_clk_init().
>
> Any comments about the main subject? Does the approach look fine?
It looks fine, except for the fact that I was wondering if the clock
provider needs to restrict itself to SCRM.
Nishant Menon brought up a need for specifying the mpu clock source
from within DT, to be able to use a generic cpufreq driver.
It could be a provider (not specific to scrm, but having only scrm
clocks for now) which we could add clocks as and when we see a need for
them to be specified from DT.
Btw, you need to copy Paul Walmsley for any clock related patches as
he is the OMAP clock maintainer.
>
> cheers,
> -roger
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-21 14:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 117+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-19 14:26 [RFC][PATCH 0/2] Device tree support for OMAP4 SCRM clocks Roger Quadros
2013-03-19 14:26 ` Roger Quadros
2013-03-19 14:26 ` Roger Quadros
[not found] ` <1363703220-4777-1-git-send-email-rogerq-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2013-03-19 14:26 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/2] ARM: OMAP4: clock: Add device tree support for AUXCLKs Roger Quadros
2013-03-19 14:26 ` Roger Quadros
2013-03-19 14:26 ` Roger Quadros
[not found] ` <1363703220-4777-2-git-send-email-rogerq-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2013-03-19 14:30 ` Roger Quadros
2013-03-19 14:30 ` Roger Quadros
2013-03-19 14:30 ` Roger Quadros
2013-03-21 13:08 ` Rajendra Nayak
2013-03-21 13:08 ` Rajendra Nayak
2013-03-21 13:08 ` Rajendra Nayak
[not found] ` <514B0650.5070406-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2013-03-21 13:54 ` Roger Quadros
2013-03-21 13:54 ` Roger Quadros
2013-03-21 13:54 ` Roger Quadros
2013-03-21 14:04 ` Rajendra Nayak [this message]
2013-03-21 14:04 ` Rajendra Nayak
2013-03-21 14:04 ` Rajendra Nayak
2013-03-21 14:11 ` Roger Quadros
2013-03-21 14:11 ` Roger Quadros
2013-03-21 14:11 ` Roger Quadros
2013-03-21 14:07 ` Roger Quadros
2013-03-21 14:07 ` Roger Quadros
2013-03-21 14:07 ` Roger Quadros
2013-03-26 10:23 ` [PATCH v2] " Roger Quadros
2013-03-26 10:23 ` Roger Quadros
2013-03-26 10:23 ` Roger Quadros
[not found] ` <1364293408-20677-1-git-send-email-rogerq-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2013-04-02 8:23 ` Roger Quadros
2013-04-02 8:23 ` Roger Quadros
2013-04-02 8:23 ` Roger Quadros
[not found] ` <515A958B.5080905-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2013-04-05 8:47 ` Roger Quadros
2013-04-05 8:47 ` Roger Quadros
2013-04-05 8:47 ` Roger Quadros
2013-04-05 8:48 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-04-05 8:48 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-04-05 8:48 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-04-05 8:50 ` Roger Quadros
2013-04-05 8:50 ` Roger Quadros
2013-04-05 8:50 ` Roger Quadros
2013-04-03 23:42 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/2] " Tony Lindgren
2013-04-03 23:42 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-04-04 5:20 ` Rajendra Nayak
2013-04-04 5:20 ` Rajendra Nayak
2013-04-04 5:20 ` Rajendra Nayak
2013-04-04 16:33 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-04-04 16:33 ` Tony Lindgren
[not found] ` <20130403234242.GE10155-4v6yS6AI5VpBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2013-04-04 7:35 ` Roger Quadros
2013-04-04 7:35 ` Roger Quadros
2013-04-04 7:35 ` Roger Quadros
2013-04-04 16:41 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-04-04 16:41 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-04-05 10:39 ` Roger Quadros
2013-04-05 10:39 ` Roger Quadros
2013-04-05 10:39 ` Roger Quadros
2013-04-05 15:58 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-04-05 15:58 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-04-05 15:58 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-04-09 9:55 ` Roger Quadros
2013-04-09 9:55 ` Roger Quadros
2013-04-09 9:55 ` Roger Quadros
2013-04-09 16:49 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-04-09 16:49 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-04-09 17:43 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-04-09 17:43 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-04-09 17:43 ` Tony Lindgren
[not found] ` <20130409174319.GP10155-4v6yS6AI5VpBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2013-04-09 20:49 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-04-09 20:49 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-04-09 20:49 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-04-09 21:54 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-04-09 21:54 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-04-09 21:54 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-04-10 11:04 ` Roger Quadros
2013-04-10 11:04 ` Roger Quadros
2013-04-10 11:04 ` Roger Quadros
2013-04-09 22:22 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-04-09 22:22 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-04-10 8:06 ` Mike Turquette
2013-04-10 8:06 ` Mike Turquette
2013-04-10 8:06 ` Mike Turquette
2013-04-10 10:55 ` Roger Quadros
2013-04-10 10:55 ` Roger Quadros
2013-04-10 10:55 ` Roger Quadros
2013-04-10 17:39 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-04-10 17:39 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-04-10 17:39 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-04-10 18:49 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-04-10 18:49 ` Tony Lindgren
[not found] ` <20130410184919.GJ10155-4v6yS6AI5VpBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2013-04-10 19:19 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-04-10 19:19 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-04-10 19:19 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-04-10 20:21 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-04-10 20:21 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-04-11 7:48 ` Roger Quadros
2013-04-11 7:48 ` Roger Quadros
2013-04-11 7:48 ` Roger Quadros
2013-04-11 9:04 ` Grygorii Strashko
2013-04-11 9:04 ` Grygorii Strashko
2013-04-11 9:04 ` Grygorii Strashko
2013-04-11 22:45 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-04-11 22:45 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-04-11 18:46 ` Mike Turquette
2013-04-11 18:46 ` Mike Turquette
2013-04-11 18:46 ` Mike Turquette
2013-04-11 22:40 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-04-11 22:40 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-04-05 17:56 ` Grygorii Strashko
2013-04-05 17:56 ` Grygorii Strashko
2013-04-05 17:56 ` Grygorii Strashko
2013-04-09 10:16 ` Roger Quadros
2013-04-09 10:16 ` Roger Quadros
2013-04-09 10:16 ` Roger Quadros
2013-03-19 14:27 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: omap4-panda: Provide PHY clock information Roger Quadros
2013-03-19 14:27 ` Roger Quadros
2013-03-19 14:27 ` Roger Quadros
2013-03-19 14:28 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/2] Device tree support for OMAP4 SCRM clocks Roger Quadros
2013-03-19 14:28 ` Roger Quadros
2013-03-19 14:28 ` Roger Quadros
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=514B1383.1070102@ti.com \
--to=rnayak@ti.com \
--cc=b-cousson@ti.com \
--cc=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=rogerq@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.