From: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
To: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
Cc: device-tree
<devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org>,
linux-omap <linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
linux-arm
<linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: OMAP4+: Correct L3 interrupts
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 10:08:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <515E8677.40404@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <515E6EAE.9000107-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
On 04/05/2013 08:26 AM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> On Thursday 04 April 2013 11:36 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> The L3 interrupt numbers are incorrect for OMAP4+ and are conflicting
>> with some of the timer interrupts causing the allocation of timer
>> interrupts to fail.
>>
>> The problem is caused by adding 32 to the interrupt number for the L3
>> interrupts to account for per processor interrupts (PPI) and software
>> generated interrupts (SGI) which typically are mapped to the first 32
>> interrupts in the ARM GIC. This is not necessary because the first
>> parameter of the ARM GIC interrupt property specifies the GIC interrupt
>> type (ie. SGI, PPI, etc). Hence, fix the interrupt number fo the L3
>> interrupts by substracting 32.
>>
>> Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
>> ---
>>
>> Please note that this problem is observed in Benoit's for_3.10/dts branch [1].
>>
>> [1] http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/bcousson/linux-omap-dt.git
>>
> Thats correct. I overlooked the 32 addition part. This patch should
> also be pulled into Benoit's 3.10 tree.
Done. I've just applied it. But I will probably merge it with the
original patch, because having a broken patch and the fix in the same
pull request does not look right.
> For the patch,
> Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
Thanks,
Benoit
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: b-cousson@ti.com (Benoit Cousson)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: dts: OMAP4+: Correct L3 interrupts
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 10:08:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <515E8677.40404@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <515E6EAE.9000107@ti.com>
On 04/05/2013 08:26 AM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> On Thursday 04 April 2013 11:36 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> The L3 interrupt numbers are incorrect for OMAP4+ and are conflicting
>> with some of the timer interrupts causing the allocation of timer
>> interrupts to fail.
>>
>> The problem is caused by adding 32 to the interrupt number for the L3
>> interrupts to account for per processor interrupts (PPI) and software
>> generated interrupts (SGI) which typically are mapped to the first 32
>> interrupts in the ARM GIC. This is not necessary because the first
>> parameter of the ARM GIC interrupt property specifies the GIC interrupt
>> type (ie. SGI, PPI, etc). Hence, fix the interrupt number fo the L3
>> interrupts by substracting 32.
>>
>> Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Please note that this problem is observed in Benoit's for_3.10/dts branch [1].
>>
>> [1] http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/bcousson/linux-omap-dt.git
>>
> Thats correct. I overlooked the 32 addition part. This patch should
> also be pulled into Benoit's 3.10 tree.
Done. I've just applied it. But I will probably merge it with the
original patch, because having a broken patch and the fix in the same
pull request does not look right.
> For the patch,
> Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Thanks,
Benoit
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-05 8:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-04 18:06 [PATCH] ARM: dts: OMAP4+: Correct L3 interrupts Jon Hunter
2013-04-04 18:06 ` Jon Hunter
[not found] ` <1365098790-9078-1-git-send-email-jon-hunter-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2013-04-05 6:26 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-04-05 6:26 ` Santosh Shilimkar
[not found] ` <515E6EAE.9000107-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2013-04-05 8:08 ` Benoit Cousson [this message]
2013-04-05 8:08 ` Benoit Cousson
2013-04-05 8:22 ` Benoit Cousson
2013-04-05 8:22 ` Benoit Cousson
2013-04-05 8:25 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-04-05 8:25 ` Santosh Shilimkar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=515E8677.40404@ti.com \
--to=b-cousson-l0cymroini0@public.gmane.org \
--cc=devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=santosh.shilimkar-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.