From: Cody P Schafer <cody@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@benyossef.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm: when handling percpu_pagelist_fraction, use on_each_cpu() to set percpu pageset fields.
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 12:27:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51646B8B.7010507@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOtvUMc0Wzhr__U5P70Rf5yhp4zvK+vMgsAD3g0ew3a8R46Z6A@mail.gmail.com>
On 04/08/2013 11:06 PM, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@benyossef.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>> I also wonder whether there could be unexpected interactions between ->high
>>> and ->batch not changing together atomically. For example, could adjusting
>>> this knob cause ->batch to rise enough that it is greater than the previous
>>> ->high? If the code above then runs with the previous ->high, ->count
>>> wouldn't be correct (checking this inside free_pcppages_bulk() might help on
>>> this one issue).
>>
>> You are right, but that can be treated in setup_pagelist_highmark() e.g.:
>>
>> 3993 static void setup_pagelist_highmark(struct per_cpu_pageset *p,
>> 3994 unsigned long high)
>> 3995 {
>> 3996 struct per_cpu_pages *pcp;
>> unsigned int batch;
>> 3997
>> 3998 pcp = &p->pcp;
>> /* We're about to mess with PCP in an non atomic fashion.
>> Put an intermediate safe value of batch and make sure it
>> is visible before any other change */
>> pcp->batch = 1UL;
>> smb_mb();
>>
>> 3999 pcp->high = high;
>
> and i think I missed another needed barrier here:
> smp_mb();
>
>>
>> 4000 batch = max(1UL, high/4);
>> 4001 if ((high/4) > (PAGE_SHIFT * 8))
>> 4002 batch = PAGE_SHIFT * 8;
>>
>> pcp->batch = batch;
>> 4003 }
>>
>
Yep, that appears to work, provided no additional users of ->batch and
->high show up. It seems we'll also need some locking to prevent
concurrent updaters, but that is relatively light weight.
I'll roll up a new patchset that uses this methodology.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Cody P Schafer <cody@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@benyossef.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm: when handling percpu_pagelist_fraction, use on_each_cpu() to set percpu pageset fields.
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 12:27:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51646B8B.7010507@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOtvUMc0Wzhr__U5P70Rf5yhp4zvK+vMgsAD3g0ew3a8R46Z6A@mail.gmail.com>
On 04/08/2013 11:06 PM, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@benyossef.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>> I also wonder whether there could be unexpected interactions between ->high
>>> and ->batch not changing together atomically. For example, could adjusting
>>> this knob cause ->batch to rise enough that it is greater than the previous
>>> ->high? If the code above then runs with the previous ->high, ->count
>>> wouldn't be correct (checking this inside free_pcppages_bulk() might help on
>>> this one issue).
>>
>> You are right, but that can be treated in setup_pagelist_highmark() e.g.:
>>
>> 3993 static void setup_pagelist_highmark(struct per_cpu_pageset *p,
>> 3994 unsigned long high)
>> 3995 {
>> 3996 struct per_cpu_pages *pcp;
>> unsigned int batch;
>> 3997
>> 3998 pcp = &p->pcp;
>> /* We're about to mess with PCP in an non atomic fashion.
>> Put an intermediate safe value of batch and make sure it
>> is visible before any other change */
>> pcp->batch = 1UL;
>> smb_mb();
>>
>> 3999 pcp->high = high;
>
> and i think I missed another needed barrier here:
> smp_mb();
>
>>
>> 4000 batch = max(1UL, high/4);
>> 4001 if ((high/4) > (PAGE_SHIFT * 8))
>> 4002 batch = PAGE_SHIFT * 8;
>>
>> pcp->batch = batch;
>> 4003 }
>>
>
Yep, that appears to work, provided no additional users of ->batch and
->high show up. It seems we'll also need some locking to prevent
concurrent updaters, but that is relatively light weight.
I'll roll up a new patchset that uses this methodology.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-09 19:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-05 20:33 [PATCH 0/3] mm: fixup changers of per cpu pageset's ->high and ->batch Cody P Schafer
2013-04-05 20:33 ` Cody P Schafer
2013-04-05 20:33 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm/page_alloc: factor out setting of pcp->high and pcp->batch Cody P Schafer
2013-04-05 20:33 ` Cody P Schafer
2013-04-07 1:37 ` Simon Jeons
2013-04-07 1:37 ` Simon Jeons
2013-04-08 17:39 ` Cody P Schafer
2013-04-08 17:39 ` Cody P Schafer
2013-04-09 5:42 ` Simon Jeons
2013-04-09 5:42 ` Simon Jeons
2013-04-05 20:33 ` [PATCH 2/3] mm/page_alloc: convert zone_pcp_update() to use on_each_cpu() instead of stop_machine() Cody P Schafer
2013-04-05 20:33 ` Cody P Schafer
2013-04-07 15:39 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-04-07 15:39 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-04-08 17:32 ` Cody P Schafer
2013-04-08 17:32 ` Cody P Schafer
2013-04-08 19:26 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-04-08 19:26 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-04-08 19:49 ` Cody P Schafer
2013-04-08 19:49 ` Cody P Schafer
2013-04-08 22:18 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-04-08 22:18 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-04-09 1:52 ` Cody P Schafer
2013-04-09 1:52 ` Cody P Schafer
2013-04-05 20:33 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm: when handling percpu_pagelist_fraction, use on_each_cpu() to set percpu pageset fields Cody P Schafer
2013-04-05 20:33 ` Cody P Schafer
2013-04-07 1:56 ` Simon Jeons
2013-04-07 1:56 ` Simon Jeons
2013-04-08 17:34 ` Cody P Schafer
2013-04-08 17:34 ` Cody P Schafer
2013-04-07 15:41 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-04-07 15:41 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-04-08 12:20 ` Gilad Ben-Yossef
2013-04-08 12:20 ` Gilad Ben-Yossef
2013-04-08 17:28 ` Cody P Schafer
2013-04-08 17:28 ` Cody P Schafer
2013-04-08 19:50 ` Cody P Schafer
2013-04-08 19:50 ` Cody P Schafer
2013-04-08 22:23 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-04-08 22:23 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-04-09 6:03 ` Gilad Ben-Yossef
2013-04-09 6:03 ` Gilad Ben-Yossef
2013-04-09 6:06 ` Gilad Ben-Yossef
2013-04-09 6:06 ` Gilad Ben-Yossef
2013-04-09 19:27 ` Cody P Schafer [this message]
2013-04-09 19:27 ` Cody P Schafer
2013-04-08 19:16 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-04-08 19:16 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-04-07 1:32 ` [PATCH 0/3] mm: fixup changers of per cpu pageset's ->high and ->batch Simon Jeons
2013-04-07 1:32 ` Simon Jeons
2013-04-08 19:37 ` Cody P Schafer
2013-04-08 19:37 ` Cody P Schafer
2013-04-07 15:23 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-04-07 15:23 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-04-08 17:16 ` Cody P Schafer
2013-04-08 17:16 ` Cody P Schafer
2013-04-08 19:08 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-04-08 19:08 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-04-08 21:17 ` Cody P Schafer
2013-04-08 21:17 ` Cody P Schafer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51646B8B.7010507@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=cody@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gilad@benyossef.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.