* [Xenomai] Spurious interrupt are raised with 2.6.1 xenomai patch @ 2013-04-24 6:29 Srikanth C 2013-04-24 6:49 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Srikanth C @ 2013-04-24 6:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Xenomai Hi, Spurious interrupts are raised on 2.6.1 Xenomai patch with Linux Kernel version 3.2.34 for every pci interrupt raise there is one spurious interrupt also getting raised. Without Xenomai patch pci interrupts are working fine (Spurious interrupts are not raised). Thanks and Regards, Srikanth ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [Xenomai] Spurious interrupt are raised with 2.6.1 xenomai patch 2013-04-24 6:29 [Xenomai] Spurious interrupt are raised with 2.6.1 xenomai patch Srikanth C @ 2013-04-24 6:49 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix 2013-04-24 6:57 ` Srikanth C 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Gilles Chanteperdrix @ 2013-04-24 6:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Srikanth C; +Cc: Xenomai On 04/24/2013 08:29 AM, Srikanth C wrote: > Hi, > > Spurious interrupts are raised on 2.6.1 Xenomai patch > with Linux Kernel version 3.2.34 > > for every pci interrupt raise there is one spurious interrupt also getting > raised. > > Without Xenomai patch pci interrupts are working fine (Spurious interrupts > are not raised). What architecture? What kind of interrupt? Do you know the latest version of Xenomai is 2.6.2.1, not 2.6.1? Where did you get an I-pipe patch for 3.2.34 as the one we provide is for 3.2.21? -- Gilles. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [Xenomai] Spurious interrupt are raised with 2.6.1 xenomai patch 2013-04-24 6:49 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix @ 2013-04-24 6:57 ` Srikanth C 2013-04-24 8:59 ` Philippe Gerum 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Srikanth C @ 2013-04-24 6:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Gilles Chanteperdrix, Xenomai Arch is PPC and interrupt is PCI, level sensitive interrupt. ipipe 3.2.21 patch is applied to kernel 3.2.24 and even I tried with ipipe-core-3.5.7-powerpc-3.patch with 3.5.7 kernel same result is observed. On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix < gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org> wrote: > On 04/24/2013 08:29 AM, Srikanth C wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Spurious interrupts are raised on 2.6.1 Xenomai patch > > with Linux Kernel version 3.2.34 > > > > for every pci interrupt raise there is one spurious interrupt also > getting > > raised. > > > > Without Xenomai patch pci interrupts are working fine (Spurious > interrupts > > are not raised). > > > What architecture? What kind of interrupt? Do you know the latest > version of Xenomai is 2.6.2.1, not 2.6.1? Where did you get an I-pipe > patch for 3.2.34 as the one we provide is for 3.2.21? > > -- > Gilles. > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [Xenomai] Spurious interrupt are raised with 2.6.1 xenomai patch 2013-04-24 6:57 ` Srikanth C @ 2013-04-24 8:59 ` Philippe Gerum 2013-04-24 9:33 ` Srikanth C 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Philippe Gerum @ 2013-04-24 8:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Srikanth C; +Cc: Xenomai On 04/24/2013 08:57 AM, Srikanth C wrote: > Arch is PPC and interrupt is PCI, level sensitive interrupt. > > ipipe 3.2.21 patch is applied to kernel 3.2.24 and even I tried with > ipipe-core-3.5.7-powerpc-3.patch with 3.5.7 kernel > same result is observed. Which powerpc platform? What is the test case? How do you notice the spurious interrupt? Is there any kernel log info you may share that reports it? Please, help us to help you. > > > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix < > gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org> wrote: > >> On 04/24/2013 08:29 AM, Srikanth C wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Spurious interrupts are raised on 2.6.1 Xenomai patch >>> with Linux Kernel version 3.2.34 >>> >>> for every pci interrupt raise there is one spurious interrupt also >> getting >>> raised. >>> >>> Without Xenomai patch pci interrupts are working fine (Spurious >> interrupts >>> are not raised). >> >> >> What architecture? What kind of interrupt? Do you know the latest >> version of Xenomai is 2.6.2.1, not 2.6.1? Where did you get an I-pipe >> patch for 3.2.34 as the one we provide is for 3.2.21? >> >> -- >> Gilles. >> > _______________________________________________ > Xenomai mailing list > Xenomai@xenomai.org > http://www.xenomai.org/mailman/listinfo/xenomai > -- Philippe. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [Xenomai] Spurious interrupt are raised with 2.6.1 xenomai patch 2013-04-24 8:59 ` Philippe Gerum @ 2013-04-24 9:33 ` Srikanth C 2013-04-25 7:57 ` Srikanth C 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Srikanth C @ 2013-04-24 9:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Philippe Gerum; +Cc: Xenomai Sorry there is typo mistake in kernel version 3.2.24 instead of 3.2.34 Please find the attached boot log and interrupts(/proc/interuupts) log Added a debug message in _ipipe_grab_irq function to verify the spurious interrupt occurrence after IACK read test code pasted below : count variable is global variable and initialised to zero ***************************************************************** count++; irq = ppc_md.get_irq(); if (unlikely(irq == NO_IRQ)) { __get_cpu_var(irq_stat).spurious_irqs++; printk("S. %d",count); return __ipipe_exit_irq(regs); } ****************************************************************** Continuous odd numbers is printed for spurious interrupt S. 1 S. 3 S. 5 On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 2:29 PM, Philippe Gerum <rpm@xenomai.org> wrote: > On 04/24/2013 08:57 AM, Srikanth C wrote: > >> Arch is PPC and interrupt is PCI, level sensitive interrupt. >> >> ipipe 3.2.21 patch is applied to kernel 3.2.24 and even I tried with >> ipipe-core-3.5.7-powerpc-3.**patch with 3.5.7 kernel >> same result is observed. >> > > Which powerpc platform? What is the test case? How do you notice the > spurious interrupt? Is there any kernel log info you may share that reports > it? > > Please, help us to help you. > > >> >> >> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix < >> gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.**org <gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org>> >> wrote: >> >> On 04/24/2013 08:29 AM, Srikanth C wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Spurious interrupts are raised on 2.6.1 Xenomai patch >>>> with Linux Kernel version 3.2.34 >>>> >>>> for every pci interrupt raise there is one spurious interrupt also >>>> >>> getting >>> >>>> raised. >>>> >>>> Without Xenomai patch pci interrupts are working fine (Spurious >>>> >>> interrupts >>> >>>> are not raised). >>>> >>> >>> >>> What architecture? What kind of interrupt? Do you know the latest >>> version of Xenomai is 2.6.2.1, not 2.6.1? Where did you get an I-pipe >>> patch for 3.2.34 as the one we provide is for 3.2.21? >>> >>> -- >>> Gilles. >>> >>> ______________________________**_________________ >> Xenomai mailing list >> Xenomai@xenomai.org >> http://www.xenomai.org/**mailman/listinfo/xenomai<http://www.xenomai.org/mailman/listinfo/xenomai> >> >> > > -- > Philippe. > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: dmesg_log Type: application/octet-stream Size: 38565 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://www.xenomai.org/pipermail/xenomai/attachments/20130424/29f2a97b/attachment.obj> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: proc_log Type: application/octet-stream Size: 414 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://www.xenomai.org/pipermail/xenomai/attachments/20130424/29f2a97b/attachment-0001.obj> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [Xenomai] Spurious interrupt are raised with 2.6.1 xenomai patch 2013-04-24 9:33 ` Srikanth C @ 2013-04-25 7:57 ` Srikanth C 2013-04-25 9:03 ` Philippe Gerum 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Srikanth C @ 2013-04-25 7:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Philippe Gerum; +Cc: Xenomai Test Results with adeos-ipipe patch: H/W Setup is same, S/W Changed to adeos-ipipe with 3.0.8 kernel. adeos-ipipe-3.0.8-powerpc-2.13-04.patch applied to 3.0.8 kernel, spurious interrupt is not raised with this patch. All ipipe series patches raising spurious interrupt in powerpc. On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Srikanth C <srikanthc9@gmail.com> wrote: > Sorry there is typo mistake in kernel version 3.2.24 instead of 3.2.34 > > Please find the attached boot log and interrupts(/proc/interuupts) log > > Added a debug message in _ipipe_grab_irq function to verify the spurious > interrupt occurrence after IACK read > test code pasted below : > count variable is global variable and initialised to zero > ***************************************************************** > count++; > irq = ppc_md.get_irq(); > if (unlikely(irq == NO_IRQ)) { > __get_cpu_var(irq_stat).spurious_irqs++; > printk("S. %d",count); > return __ipipe_exit_irq(regs); > } > ****************************************************************** > Continuous odd numbers is printed for spurious interrupt > S. 1 > S. 3 > S. 5 > > > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 2:29 PM, Philippe Gerum <rpm@xenomai.org> wrote: > >> On 04/24/2013 08:57 AM, Srikanth C wrote: >> >>> Arch is PPC and interrupt is PCI, level sensitive interrupt. >>> >>> ipipe 3.2.21 patch is applied to kernel 3.2.24 and even I tried with >>> ipipe-core-3.5.7-powerpc-3.**patch with 3.5.7 kernel >>> same result is observed. >>> >> >> Which powerpc platform? What is the test case? How do you notice the >> spurious interrupt? Is there any kernel log info you may share that reports >> it? >> >> Please, help us to help you. >> >> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix < >>> gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.**org <gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org>> >>> wrote: >>> >>> On 04/24/2013 08:29 AM, Srikanth C wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> Spurious interrupts are raised on 2.6.1 Xenomai patch >>>>> with Linux Kernel version 3.2.34 >>>>> >>>>> for every pci interrupt raise there is one spurious interrupt also >>>>> >>>> getting >>>> >>>>> raised. >>>>> >>>>> Without Xenomai patch pci interrupts are working fine (Spurious >>>>> >>>> interrupts >>>> >>>>> are not raised). >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> What architecture? What kind of interrupt? Do you know the latest >>>> version of Xenomai is 2.6.2.1, not 2.6.1? Where did you get an I-pipe >>>> patch for 3.2.34 as the one we provide is for 3.2.21? >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Gilles. >>>> >>>> ______________________________**_________________ >>> Xenomai mailing list >>> Xenomai@xenomai.org >>> http://www.xenomai.org/**mailman/listinfo/xenomai<http://www.xenomai.org/mailman/listinfo/xenomai> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> Philippe. >> > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [Xenomai] Spurious interrupt are raised with 2.6.1 xenomai patch 2013-04-25 7:57 ` Srikanth C @ 2013-04-25 9:03 ` Philippe Gerum 2013-04-25 9:06 ` Philippe Gerum 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Philippe Gerum @ 2013-04-25 9:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Srikanth C; +Cc: Xenomai On 04/25/2013 09:57 AM, Srikanth C wrote: > Test Results with adeos-ipipe patch: > > H/W Setup is same, S/W Changed to adeos-ipipe with 3.0.8 kernel. > > adeos-ipipe-3.0.8-powerpc-2.13-04.patch applied to 3.0.8 kernel, > spurious interrupt is not raised with this patch. > I still don't know what ppc platform you are running on, which does not allow me to figure out which interrupt controller might be involved, and how to try reproducing this issue. Again and I won't ask for this once more: - what is your ppc platform: 40x, 44x, 52xx, 82xx, 83xx, 85xx, 86xx, anything else? > All ipipe series patches raising spurious interrupt in powerpc. > The few patches > 3.0.8 you tried on your own PCI setup and kernel configuration raise spurious interrupts on your own board, would be a more informative way to describe the situation. -- Philippe. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [Xenomai] Spurious interrupt are raised with 2.6.1 xenomai patch 2013-04-25 9:03 ` Philippe Gerum @ 2013-04-25 9:06 ` Philippe Gerum 2013-04-26 14:46 ` Philippe Gerum 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Philippe Gerum @ 2013-04-25 9:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Srikanth C; +Cc: Xenomai On 04/25/2013 11:03 AM, Philippe Gerum wrote: > On 04/25/2013 09:57 AM, Srikanth C wrote: >> Test Results with adeos-ipipe patch: >> >> H/W Setup is same, S/W Changed to adeos-ipipe with 3.0.8 kernel. >> >> adeos-ipipe-3.0.8-powerpc-2.13-04.patch applied to 3.0.8 kernel, >> spurious interrupt is not raised with this patch. >> > > I still don't know what ppc platform you are running on, which does not > allow me to figure out which interrupt controller might be involved, and > how to try reproducing this issue. > > Again and I won't ask for this once more: > > - what is your ppc platform: 40x, 44x, 52xx, 82xx, 83xx, 85xx, 86xx, > anything else? I need the cpu type _and_ the board type. Attaching your kernel .config would provide the required information. > >> All ipipe series patches raising spurious interrupt in powerpc. >> > > The few patches > 3.0.8 you tried on your own PCI setup and kernel > configuration raise spurious interrupts on your own board, would be a > more informative way to describe the situation. > -- Philippe. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [Xenomai] Spurious interrupt are raised with 2.6.1 xenomai patch 2013-04-25 9:06 ` Philippe Gerum @ 2013-04-26 14:46 ` Philippe Gerum 2013-04-26 18:49 ` Srikanth C 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Philippe Gerum @ 2013-04-26 14:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Srikanth C; +Cc: Xenomai On 04/25/2013 11:06 AM, Philippe Gerum wrote: > On 04/25/2013 11:03 AM, Philippe Gerum wrote: >> On 04/25/2013 09:57 AM, Srikanth C wrote: >>> Test Results with adeos-ipipe patch: >>> >>> H/W Setup is same, S/W Changed to adeos-ipipe with 3.0.8 kernel. >>> >>> adeos-ipipe-3.0.8-powerpc-2.13-04.patch applied to 3.0.8 kernel, >>> spurious interrupt is not raised with this patch. >>> >> >> I still don't know what ppc platform you are running on, which does not >> allow me to figure out which interrupt controller might be involved, and >> how to try reproducing this issue. >> >> Again and I won't ask for this once more: >> >> - what is your ppc platform: 40x, 44x, 52xx, 82xx, 83xx, 85xx, 86xx, >> anything else? > > I need the cpu type _and_ the board type. Attaching your kernel .config > would provide the required information. CONFIG_PCI_MSI as found in your configuration won't work, with any past or current pipeline release for powerpc (3.0.8 was certainly a fluke, or MSI was disabled there). The IRQ chip handlers are still attempting to mask the MSI source upon interrupt, which won't fly in the I-pipe case. -- Philippe. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [Xenomai] Spurious interrupt are raised with 2.6.1 xenomai patch 2013-04-26 14:46 ` Philippe Gerum @ 2013-04-26 18:49 ` Srikanth C 2013-04-29 19:27 ` Srikanth C 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Srikanth C @ 2013-04-26 18:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Philippe Gerum; +Cc: Xenomai CONFIG_PCI_MSI is disabled in kernel, still spurious interrupts are raised. I tried with 3.1.10 kernel with adeos 3.1.10 patch with the same config file but no spurious interrupts are raised. adeos patches are working fine, problem only with ipipe series. why ppc_md.get_irq is reading FF when interrupt is raised (this is happening after patching the xenomai, without xenomai patch same kernel with same configuration is working fine). On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Philippe Gerum <rpm@xenomai.org> wrote: > On 04/25/2013 11:06 AM, Philippe Gerum wrote: > >> On 04/25/2013 11:03 AM, Philippe Gerum wrote: >> >>> On 04/25/2013 09:57 AM, Srikanth C wrote: >>> >>>> Test Results with adeos-ipipe patch: >>>> >>>> H/W Setup is same, S/W Changed to adeos-ipipe with 3.0.8 kernel. >>>> >>>> adeos-ipipe-3.0.8-powerpc-2.**13-04.patch applied to 3.0.8 kernel, >>>> spurious interrupt is not raised with this patch. >>>> >>>> >>> I still don't know what ppc platform you are running on, which does not >>> allow me to figure out which interrupt controller might be involved, and >>> how to try reproducing this issue. >>> >>> Again and I won't ask for this once more: >>> >>> - what is your ppc platform: 40x, 44x, 52xx, 82xx, 83xx, 85xx, 86xx, >>> anything else? >>> >> >> I need the cpu type _and_ the board type. Attaching your kernel .config >> would provide the required information. >> > > CONFIG_PCI_MSI as found in your configuration won't work, with any past or > current pipeline release for powerpc (3.0.8 was certainly a fluke, or MSI > was disabled there). The IRQ chip handlers are still attempting to mask the > MSI source upon interrupt, which won't fly in the I-pipe case. > > -- > Philippe. > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [Xenomai] Spurious interrupt are raised with 2.6.1 xenomai patch 2013-04-26 18:49 ` Srikanth C @ 2013-04-29 19:27 ` Srikanth C 0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Srikanth C @ 2013-04-29 19:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Philippe Gerum; +Cc: Xenomai Problem is resolved, issue with the hardware. Thanks for your valuable time and support. Regards, Srikanth On Apr 27, 2013 12:19 AM, "Srikanth C" <srikanthc9@gmail.com> wrote: > > CONFIG_PCI_MSI is disabled in kernel, still spurious interrupts are raised. > > I tried with 3.1.10 kernel with adeos 3.1.10 patch with the same config > file but no spurious interrupts are raised. > > adeos patches are working fine, problem only with ipipe series. > > why ppc_md.get_irq is reading FF when interrupt is raised (this is > happening after patching the xenomai, without xenomai patch same kernel > with same configuration is working fine). > > > On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Philippe Gerum <rpm@xenomai.org> wrote: > >> On 04/25/2013 11:06 AM, Philippe Gerum wrote: >> >>> On 04/25/2013 11:03 AM, Philippe Gerum wrote: >>> >>>> On 04/25/2013 09:57 AM, Srikanth C wrote: >>>> >>>>> Test Results with adeos-ipipe patch: >>>>> >>>>> H/W Setup is same, S/W Changed to adeos-ipipe with 3.0.8 kernel. >>>>> >>>>> adeos-ipipe-3.0.8-powerpc-2.**13-04.patch applied to 3.0.8 kernel, >>>>> spurious interrupt is not raised with this patch. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> I still don't know what ppc platform you are running on, which does not >>>> allow me to figure out which interrupt controller might be involved, and >>>> how to try reproducing this issue. >>>> >>>> Again and I won't ask for this once more: >>>> >>>> - what is your ppc platform: 40x, 44x, 52xx, 82xx, 83xx, 85xx, 86xx, >>>> anything else? >>>> >>> >>> I need the cpu type _and_ the board type. Attaching your kernel .config >>> would provide the required information. >>> >> >> CONFIG_PCI_MSI as found in your configuration won't work, with any past >> or current pipeline release for powerpc (3.0.8 was certainly a fluke, or >> MSI was disabled there). The IRQ chip handlers are still attempting to mask >> the MSI source upon interrupt, which won't fly in the I-pipe case. >> >> -- >> Philippe. >> > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-04-29 19:27 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2013-04-24 6:29 [Xenomai] Spurious interrupt are raised with 2.6.1 xenomai patch Srikanth C 2013-04-24 6:49 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix 2013-04-24 6:57 ` Srikanth C 2013-04-24 8:59 ` Philippe Gerum 2013-04-24 9:33 ` Srikanth C 2013-04-25 7:57 ` Srikanth C 2013-04-25 9:03 ` Philippe Gerum 2013-04-25 9:06 ` Philippe Gerum 2013-04-26 14:46 ` Philippe Gerum 2013-04-26 18:49 ` Srikanth C 2013-04-29 19:27 ` Srikanth C
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.