* Vanity Hostnames Not Working
@ 2013-04-25 22:29 brady
[not found] ` <CA+zLgM0Q3723J2_J1VkNZHQHswjByfQFOY2AHLpCE8MH0apCHA@mail.gmail.com>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: brady @ 2013-04-25 22:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ceph-devel
Hello list,
We are running Bobtail on our cluster and currently attempting to make
the vanity host names work in the radosGW configuration. Our rgw segment
of the ceph.conf file looks like:
[client.radosgw.rgw1]
host = ceph-rgw1
rgw dns name = objects.lamphost.net
rgw resolve cname = true
rgw enable usage log = true
keyring = /etc/ceph/keyring.radosgw.rgw1
rgw socket path = /run/radosgw.sock
log file = /var/log/ceph/radosgw.log
The DNS does not seem to route with the configuration above. Is there
something else/different that is required to make this work? We have not
seen any concrete examples of configurations for this despite the Vanity
host names being listed as an addition in the Bobtail release notes.
Thanks in advance!
-Brady
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread[parent not found: <CA+zLgM0Q3723J2_J1VkNZHQHswjByfQFOY2AHLpCE8MH0apCHA@mail.gmail.com>]
[parent not found: <CA+zLgM1qhUVWmNdcJqxH4Dqnao7JaAXTLuub0nYBTbhYmqr7yw@mail.gmail.com>]
* Re: Vanity Hostnames Not Working [not found] ` <CA+zLgM1qhUVWmNdcJqxH4Dqnao7JaAXTLuub0nYBTbhYmqr7yw@mail.gmail.com> @ 2013-04-25 23:13 ` brady 2013-04-25 23:39 ` Yehuda Sadeh 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: brady @ 2013-04-25 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Caleb Miles; +Cc: ceph-devel Hi, On 04/25/2013 03:56 PM, Caleb Miles wrote: > Hello Brady, > > Have you also set up Dnsmasq or similar on your client(s) to point to your > vanity name? We are not specifically using Dnsmasq, but we have set up the DNS records, including the CNAME pointing to the bucket at the correct IP. > >> On Apr 25, 2013 6:49 PM, "brady" <brady@lamphost.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hello list, >>> We are running Bobtail on our cluster and currently attempting > to make the vanity host names work in the radosGW configuration. Our rgw > segment of the ceph.conf file looks like: >>> >>> [client.radosgw.rgw1] >>> host = ceph-rgw1 >>> rgw dns name = objects.lamphost.net >>> rgw resolve cname = true >>> rgw enable usage log = true >>> keyring = /etc/ceph/keyring.radosgw.rgw1 >>> rgw socket path = /run/radosgw.sock >>> log file = /var/log/ceph/radosgw.log >>> >>> The DNS does not seem to route with the configuration above. Is > there something else/different that is required to make this work? We have > not seen any concrete examples of configurations for this despite the > Vanity host names being listed as an addition in the Bobtail release notes. >>> >>> Thanks in advance! >>> >>> -Brady >>> -- >>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in >>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -Brady ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Vanity Hostnames Not Working 2013-04-25 23:13 ` brady @ 2013-04-25 23:39 ` Yehuda Sadeh 2013-04-26 16:26 ` brady 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Yehuda Sadeh @ 2013-04-25 23:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: brady; +Cc: Caleb Miles, ceph-devel On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 4:13 PM, brady <brady@lamphost.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On 04/25/2013 03:56 PM, Caleb Miles wrote: >> >> Hello Brady, >> >> Have you also set up Dnsmasq or similar on your client(s) to point to your >> vanity name? > > > We are not specifically using Dnsmasq, but we have set up the DNS records, > including the CNAME pointing to the bucket at the correct IP. How does the CNAME record look like? > > >> >>> On Apr 25, 2013 6:49 PM, "brady" <brady@lamphost.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Hello list, >>>> We are running Bobtail on our cluster and currently attempting >> >> to make the vanity host names work in the radosGW configuration. Our rgw >> segment of the ceph.conf file looks like: >>>> >>>> >>>> [client.radosgw.rgw1] >>>> host = ceph-rgw1 >>>> rgw dns name = objects.lamphost.net >>>> rgw resolve cname = true >>>> rgw enable usage log = true >>>> keyring = /etc/ceph/keyring.radosgw.rgw1 >>>> rgw socket path = /run/radosgw.sock >>>> log file = /var/log/ceph/radosgw.log >>>> >>>> The DNS does not seem to route with the configuration above. Is >> >> there something else/different that is required to make this work? We have >> not seen any concrete examples of configurations for this despite the >> Vanity host names being listed as an addition in the Bobtail release >> notes. >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks in advance! >>>> >>>> -Brady >>>> -- >>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in >>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> >> > > -Brady > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Vanity Hostnames Not Working 2013-04-25 23:39 ` Yehuda Sadeh @ 2013-04-26 16:26 ` brady 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: brady @ 2013-04-26 16:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yehuda Sadeh; +Cc: Caleb Miles, ceph-devel Thanks guys! Once we looked at the CNAME to get ready to paste it into the message, we noticed that the formatting was incorrect. Sorry to bother with such a trivial issue but thanks for pointing us in the right direction! Everything is working now. -Brady On 04/25/2013 04:39 PM, Yehuda Sadeh wrote: > On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 4:13 PM, brady <brady@lamphost.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 04/25/2013 03:56 PM, Caleb Miles wrote: >>> >>> Hello Brady, >>> >>> Have you also set up Dnsmasq or similar on your client(s) to point to your >>> vanity name? >> >> >> We are not specifically using Dnsmasq, but we have set up the DNS records, >> including the CNAME pointing to the bucket at the correct IP. > > How does the CNAME record look like? > >> >> >>> >>>> On Apr 25, 2013 6:49 PM, "brady" <brady@lamphost.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hello list, >>>>> We are running Bobtail on our cluster and currently attempting >>> >>> to make the vanity host names work in the radosGW configuration. Our rgw >>> segment of the ceph.conf file looks like: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> [client.radosgw.rgw1] >>>>> host = ceph-rgw1 >>>>> rgw dns name = objects.lamphost.net >>>>> rgw resolve cname = true >>>>> rgw enable usage log = true >>>>> keyring = /etc/ceph/keyring.radosgw.rgw1 >>>>> rgw socket path = /run/radosgw.sock >>>>> log file = /var/log/ceph/radosgw.log >>>>> >>>>> The DNS does not seem to route with the configuration above. Is >>> >>> there something else/different that is required to make this work? We have >>> not seen any concrete examples of configurations for this despite the >>> Vanity host names being listed as an addition in the Bobtail release >>> notes. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks in advance! >>>>> >>>>> -Brady >>>>> -- >>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in >>>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >>>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >>> >>> >> >> -Brady >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-04-26 16:26 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-04-25 22:29 Vanity Hostnames Not Working brady
[not found] ` <CA+zLgM0Q3723J2_J1VkNZHQHswjByfQFOY2AHLpCE8MH0apCHA@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CA+zLgM1qhUVWmNdcJqxH4Dqnao7JaAXTLuub0nYBTbhYmqr7yw@mail.gmail.com>
2013-04-25 23:13 ` brady
2013-04-25 23:39 ` Yehuda Sadeh
2013-04-26 16:26 ` brady
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.