From: Cody P Schafer <cody@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] mmzone: note that node_size_lock should be manipulated via pgdat_resize_lock()
Date: Wed, 01 May 2013 15:36:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51819900.1010301@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1305011528550.8804@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
On 05/01/2013 03:29 PM, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Wed, 1 May 2013, Cody P Schafer wrote:
>
>> Signed-off-by: Cody P Schafer <cody@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> Nack, pgdat_resize_unlock() is unnecessary if irqs are known to be
> disabled.
>
All this patch does is is indicate that rather than using node_size_lock
directly (as it won't be around without CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG), one
should use the pgdat_resize_[un]lock() helper macros.
And yes, _strictly_ speaking, one could want to avoid the
spin_lock_irqsave/restore that pgdat_resize_*lock() does.
Right now we don't provide helpers that do that. Do you see a need for them?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Cody P Schafer <cody@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] mmzone: note that node_size_lock should be manipulated via pgdat_resize_lock()
Date: Wed, 01 May 2013 15:36:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51819900.1010301@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1305011528550.8804@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
On 05/01/2013 03:29 PM, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Wed, 1 May 2013, Cody P Schafer wrote:
>
>> Signed-off-by: Cody P Schafer <cody@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> Nack, pgdat_resize_unlock() is unnecessary if irqs are known to be
> disabled.
>
All this patch does is is indicate that rather than using node_size_lock
directly (as it won't be around without CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG), one
should use the pgdat_resize_[un]lock() helper macros.
And yes, _strictly_ speaking, one could want to avoid the
spin_lock_irqsave/restore that pgdat_resize_*lock() does.
Right now we don't provide helpers that do that. Do you see a need for them?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-01 22:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-01 22:17 [PATCH 0/4] misc patches related to resizing nodes & zones Cody P Schafer
2013-05-01 22:17 ` Cody P Schafer
2013-05-01 22:17 ` [PATCH 1/4] mmzone: make holding lock_memory_hotplug() a requirement for updating pgdat size Cody P Schafer
2013-05-01 22:17 ` Cody P Schafer
2013-05-01 22:26 ` David Rientjes
2013-05-01 22:26 ` David Rientjes
2013-05-01 22:32 ` Cody P Schafer
2013-05-01 22:32 ` Cody P Schafer
2013-05-01 22:39 ` David Rientjes
2013-05-01 22:39 ` David Rientjes
2013-05-01 22:45 ` Cody P Schafer
2013-05-01 22:45 ` Cody P Schafer
2013-05-01 22:17 ` [PATCH 2/4] mm: fix comment referring to non-existent size_seqlock, change to span_seqlock Cody P Schafer
2013-05-01 22:17 ` Cody P Schafer
2013-05-01 22:27 ` David Rientjes
2013-05-01 22:27 ` David Rientjes
2013-05-01 22:17 ` [PATCH 3/4] mmzone: note that node_size_lock should be manipulated via pgdat_resize_lock() Cody P Schafer
2013-05-01 22:17 ` Cody P Schafer
2013-05-01 22:29 ` David Rientjes
2013-05-01 22:29 ` David Rientjes
2013-05-01 22:36 ` Cody P Schafer [this message]
2013-05-01 22:36 ` Cody P Schafer
2013-05-01 22:42 ` David Rientjes
2013-05-01 22:42 ` David Rientjes
2013-05-01 22:47 ` Cody P Schafer
2013-05-01 22:47 ` Cody P Schafer
2013-05-01 22:17 ` [PATCH 4/4] memory_hotplug: use pgdat_resize_lock() when updating node_present_pages Cody P Schafer
2013-05-01 22:17 ` Cody P Schafer
2013-05-01 22:30 ` David Rientjes
2013-05-01 22:30 ` David Rientjes
2013-05-01 22:41 ` Cody P Schafer
2013-05-01 22:41 ` Cody P Schafer
2013-05-01 22:48 ` David Rientjes
2013-05-01 22:48 ` David Rientjes
2013-05-01 22:51 ` Cody P Schafer
2013-05-01 22:51 ` Cody P Schafer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51819900.1010301@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=cody@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.