All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cody P Schafer <cody@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] mmzone: note that node_size_lock should be manipulated via pgdat_resize_lock()
Date: Wed, 01 May 2013 15:47:59 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51819B9F.3090407@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1305011541260.8804@chino.kir.corp.google.com>

On 05/01/2013 03:42 PM, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Wed, 1 May 2013, Cody P Schafer wrote:
>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Cody P Schafer <cody@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>
>>> Nack, pgdat_resize_unlock() is unnecessary if irqs are known to be
>>> disabled.
>>>
>>
>> All this patch does is is indicate that rather than using node_size_lock
>> directly (as it won't be around without CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG), one should use
>> the pgdat_resize_[un]lock() helper macros.
>>
>
> I think that's obvious given the lock is surrounded by
> #ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG.  The fact remains that hotplug code need not
> use pgdat_resize_lock() if irqs are disabled.
>

Obvious how? This comment is the documentation on how to handle locking 
of pg_data_t, and doesn't mention pgdat_resize_lock() at all. Sure, a 
newcomer would probably find pgdat_resize_lock() eventually, even more 
so if they were interested in performance gains from not re-disabling 
local irqs.

I don't see a convincing reason to omit relevant documentation and make 
it more difficult to find the "right" way to do things.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Cody P Schafer <cody@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] mmzone: note that node_size_lock should be manipulated via pgdat_resize_lock()
Date: Wed, 01 May 2013 15:47:59 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51819B9F.3090407@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1305011541260.8804@chino.kir.corp.google.com>

On 05/01/2013 03:42 PM, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Wed, 1 May 2013, Cody P Schafer wrote:
>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Cody P Schafer <cody@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>
>>> Nack, pgdat_resize_unlock() is unnecessary if irqs are known to be
>>> disabled.
>>>
>>
>> All this patch does is is indicate that rather than using node_size_lock
>> directly (as it won't be around without CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG), one should use
>> the pgdat_resize_[un]lock() helper macros.
>>
>
> I think that's obvious given the lock is surrounded by
> #ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG.  The fact remains that hotplug code need not
> use pgdat_resize_lock() if irqs are disabled.
>

Obvious how? This comment is the documentation on how to handle locking 
of pg_data_t, and doesn't mention pgdat_resize_lock() at all. Sure, a 
newcomer would probably find pgdat_resize_lock() eventually, even more 
so if they were interested in performance gains from not re-disabling 
local irqs.

I don't see a convincing reason to omit relevant documentation and make 
it more difficult to find the "right" way to do things.


  reply	other threads:[~2013-05-01 22:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-01 22:17 [PATCH 0/4] misc patches related to resizing nodes & zones Cody P Schafer
2013-05-01 22:17 ` Cody P Schafer
2013-05-01 22:17 ` [PATCH 1/4] mmzone: make holding lock_memory_hotplug() a requirement for updating pgdat size Cody P Schafer
2013-05-01 22:17   ` Cody P Schafer
2013-05-01 22:26   ` David Rientjes
2013-05-01 22:26     ` David Rientjes
2013-05-01 22:32     ` Cody P Schafer
2013-05-01 22:32       ` Cody P Schafer
2013-05-01 22:39       ` David Rientjes
2013-05-01 22:39         ` David Rientjes
2013-05-01 22:45         ` Cody P Schafer
2013-05-01 22:45           ` Cody P Schafer
2013-05-01 22:17 ` [PATCH 2/4] mm: fix comment referring to non-existent size_seqlock, change to span_seqlock Cody P Schafer
2013-05-01 22:17   ` Cody P Schafer
2013-05-01 22:27   ` David Rientjes
2013-05-01 22:27     ` David Rientjes
2013-05-01 22:17 ` [PATCH 3/4] mmzone: note that node_size_lock should be manipulated via pgdat_resize_lock() Cody P Schafer
2013-05-01 22:17   ` Cody P Schafer
2013-05-01 22:29   ` David Rientjes
2013-05-01 22:29     ` David Rientjes
2013-05-01 22:36     ` Cody P Schafer
2013-05-01 22:36       ` Cody P Schafer
2013-05-01 22:42       ` David Rientjes
2013-05-01 22:42         ` David Rientjes
2013-05-01 22:47         ` Cody P Schafer [this message]
2013-05-01 22:47           ` Cody P Schafer
2013-05-01 22:17 ` [PATCH 4/4] memory_hotplug: use pgdat_resize_lock() when updating node_present_pages Cody P Schafer
2013-05-01 22:17   ` Cody P Schafer
2013-05-01 22:30   ` David Rientjes
2013-05-01 22:30     ` David Rientjes
2013-05-01 22:41     ` Cody P Schafer
2013-05-01 22:41       ` Cody P Schafer
2013-05-01 22:48       ` David Rientjes
2013-05-01 22:48         ` David Rientjes
2013-05-01 22:51         ` Cody P Schafer
2013-05-01 22:51           ` Cody P Schafer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51819B9F.3090407@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=cody@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.