From: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@ti.com>
To: Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi>
Cc: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@ti.com>,
tony@atomide.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND][PATCH 1/3] arm: dts: introduce config HAS_BANDGAP
Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 18:40:53 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51883175.8010001@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130506213413.GH5634@blackmetal.musicnaut.iki.fi>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1000 bytes --]
On 06-05-2013 17:34, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
> On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 05:00:56PM -0400, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
>> Introduce HAS_BANDGAP config entry. This config is a
>> boolean value so that arch code can flag is they
>> feature a bandgap device.
>
> Maybe it could be mentioned that omap-thermal already depend on this?
> At least for a random reviewer it was not immediately clear why this is
> added, especially since there were no users for it in subsequent patches.
>
> A.
>
>
The flag has been proposed here [1]. The adaptation on the driver has
been introduced here [2,3]. It has reached the staging (next) tree. That
is why you do not see any follow up patch. Although it does not have
users at v3.9, the patch on the user has been sent several weeks ago.
[1] -
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2012-May/101827.html
[2] - http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=136335347305197&w=2
[3] - http://marc.info/?l=linux-driver-devel&m=136335404205514&w=1
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 295 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: eduardo.valentin@ti.com (Eduardo Valentin)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RESEND][PATCH 1/3] arm: dts: introduce config HAS_BANDGAP
Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 18:40:53 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51883175.8010001@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130506213413.GH5634@blackmetal.musicnaut.iki.fi>
On 06-05-2013 17:34, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
> On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 05:00:56PM -0400, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
>> Introduce HAS_BANDGAP config entry. This config is a
>> boolean value so that arch code can flag is they
>> feature a bandgap device.
>
> Maybe it could be mentioned that omap-thermal already depend on this?
> At least for a random reviewer it was not immediately clear why this is
> added, especially since there were no users for it in subsequent patches.
>
> A.
>
>
The flag has been proposed here [1]. The adaptation on the driver has
been introduced here [2,3]. It has reached the staging (next) tree. That
is why you do not see any follow up patch. Although it does not have
users at v3.9, the patch on the user has been sent several weeks ago.
[1] -
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2012-May/101827.html
[2] - http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=136335347305197&w=2
[3] - http://marc.info/?l=linux-driver-devel&m=136335404205514&w=1
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 295 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20130506/c78e1c7b/attachment.sig>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@ti.com>
To: Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi>
Cc: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@ti.com>, <tony@atomide.com>,
<linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND][PATCH 1/3] arm: dts: introduce config HAS_BANDGAP
Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 18:40:53 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51883175.8010001@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130506213413.GH5634@blackmetal.musicnaut.iki.fi>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1000 bytes --]
On 06-05-2013 17:34, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
> On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 05:00:56PM -0400, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
>> Introduce HAS_BANDGAP config entry. This config is a
>> boolean value so that arch code can flag is they
>> feature a bandgap device.
>
> Maybe it could be mentioned that omap-thermal already depend on this?
> At least for a random reviewer it was not immediately clear why this is
> added, especially since there were no users for it in subsequent patches.
>
> A.
>
>
The flag has been proposed here [1]. The adaptation on the driver has
been introduced here [2,3]. It has reached the staging (next) tree. That
is why you do not see any follow up patch. Although it does not have
users at v3.9, the patch on the user has been sent several weeks ago.
[1] -
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2012-May/101827.html
[2] - http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=136335347305197&w=2
[3] - http://marc.info/?l=linux-driver-devel&m=136335404205514&w=1
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 295 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-06 22:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-06 21:00 [RESEND][PATCH 0/3] arm: enable TI SoC thermal driver Eduardo Valentin
2013-05-06 21:00 ` [RESEND][PATCH 1/3] arm: dts: introduce config HAS_BANDGAP Eduardo Valentin
2013-05-06 21:00 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-05-06 21:00 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-05-06 21:31 ` Stephen Warren
2013-05-06 21:31 ` Stephen Warren
2013-05-07 0:20 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-05-07 0:20 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-05-07 0:20 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-05-06 21:34 ` Aaro Koskinen
2013-05-06 21:34 ` Aaro Koskinen
2013-05-06 22:36 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-05-06 22:36 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-05-07 0:23 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-05-07 0:23 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-05-07 0:23 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-05-07 0:36 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-05-07 0:36 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-05-07 0:36 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-05-07 13:15 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-05-07 13:15 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-05-07 13:15 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-05-07 18:27 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-05-07 18:27 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-05-07 19:06 ` Aaro Koskinen
2013-05-07 19:06 ` Aaro Koskinen
2013-05-08 6:04 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2013-05-08 6:04 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2013-05-08 6:04 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2013-05-06 22:40 ` Eduardo Valentin [this message]
2013-05-06 22:40 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-05-06 22:40 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-05-06 21:00 ` [RESEND][PATCH 2/3] arm: dts: add bandgap entry for OMAP443x devices Eduardo Valentin
2013-05-06 21:00 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-05-06 21:00 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-05-06 21:00 ` [RESEND][PATCH 3/3] arm: add bandgap entry for OMAP4460 devices Eduardo Valentin
2013-05-06 21:00 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-05-06 21:00 ` Eduardo Valentin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51883175.8010001@ti.com \
--to=eduardo.valentin@ti.com \
--cc=aaro.koskinen@iki.fi \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.