From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
To: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Cc: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Jamie Iles <jamie@jamieiles.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
Christian Daudt <csd@broadcom.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
David Brown <davidb@codeaurora.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>,
Barry Song <baohua.song@csr.com>,
Tony Prisk <linux@prisktech.co.nz>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/14] ARM: mvebu: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description
Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 17:53:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51910C81.5050501@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130513151934.GM31290@titan.lakedaemon.net>
Hi Jason,
Le 13/05/2013 17:19, Jason Cooper a écrit :
> On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 11:44:08AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>> Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
>> specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
>> the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
>> declaration for mvebu as well.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mach-mvebu/armada-370-xp.c | 1 -
>> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> Maxime,
>
> Do do want the individual submaintainers to take these? Or, send one
> branch to Arnd and Olof? I'm fine with either one as any merge
> conflicts should be trivial.
I don't have a strong opinion on this one, I guess both will be fine.
Arnd, Olof, what do you prefer?
I'll probably have to send a v2 anyway, I forgot to remove the include
of the irqchip headers.
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/14] ARM: mvebu: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description
Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 15:53:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51910C81.5050501@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130513151934.GM31290@titan.lakedaemon.net>
Hi Jason,
Le 13/05/2013 17:19, Jason Cooper a écrit :
> On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 11:44:08AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>> Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
>> specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
>> the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
>> declaration for mvebu as well.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mach-mvebu/armada-370-xp.c | 1 -
>> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> Maxime,
>
> Do do want the individual submaintainers to take these? Or, send one
> branch to Arnd and Olof? I'm fine with either one as any merge
> conflicts should be trivial.
I don't have a strong opinion on this one, I guess both will be fine.
Arnd, Olof, what do you prefer?
I'll probably have to send a v2 anyway, I forgot to remove the include
of the irqchip headers.
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com (Maxime Ripard)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 09/14] ARM: mvebu: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description
Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 17:53:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51910C81.5050501@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130513151934.GM31290@titan.lakedaemon.net>
Hi Jason,
Le 13/05/2013 17:19, Jason Cooper a ?crit :
> On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 11:44:08AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>> Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
>> specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
>> the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
>> declaration for mvebu as well.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mach-mvebu/armada-370-xp.c | 1 -
>> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> Maxime,
>
> Do do want the individual submaintainers to take these? Or, send one
> branch to Arnd and Olof? I'm fine with either one as any merge
> conflicts should be trivial.
I don't have a strong opinion on this one, I guess both will be fine.
Arnd, Olof, what do you prefer?
I'll probably have to send a v2 anyway, I forgot to remove the include
of the irqchip headers.
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-13 15:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 84+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-13 9:43 [PATCH 00/14] Cleanup irqchip_init calls Maxime Ripard
2013-05-13 9:43 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-05-13 9:43 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-05-13 9:44 ` [PATCH 01/14] ARM: sunxi: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description Maxime Ripard
2013-05-13 9:44 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-05-13 9:44 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-05-13 9:44 ` [PATCH 02/14] ARM: zynq: " Maxime Ripard
2013-05-13 9:44 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-05-13 9:44 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-05-13 9:44 ` [PATCH 03/14] ARM: nomadik: " Maxime Ripard
2013-05-13 9:44 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-05-13 9:44 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-05-13 9:44 ` [PATCH 04/14] ARM: picoxcell: " Maxime Ripard
2013-05-13 9:44 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-05-13 9:44 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-05-13 9:44 ` [PATCH 05/14] ARM: shmobile: " Maxime Ripard
2013-05-13 9:44 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-05-13 9:44 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-05-14 0:35 ` Simon Horman
2013-05-14 0:35 ` Simon Horman
2013-05-14 0:35 ` Simon Horman
2013-05-14 8:23 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-05-14 8:23 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-05-14 8:23 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-05-13 9:44 ` [PATCH 06/14] ARM: bcm281xx: " Maxime Ripard
2013-05-13 9:44 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-05-13 9:44 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-05-13 20:06 ` Christian Daudt
2013-05-13 20:06 ` Christian Daudt
2013-05-13 20:06 ` Christian Daudt
2013-05-14 8:25 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-05-14 8:25 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-05-14 8:25 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-05-14 14:58 ` Christian Daudt
2013-05-14 14:58 ` Christian Daudt
2013-05-14 14:58 ` Christian Daudt
2013-05-13 9:44 ` [PATCH 07/14] ARM: spear: " Maxime Ripard
2013-05-13 9:44 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-05-13 9:44 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-05-13 9:46 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-05-13 9:58 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-05-13 9:46 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-05-13 9:44 ` [PATCH 08/14] ARM: msm: " Maxime Ripard
2013-05-13 9:44 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-05-13 9:44 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-05-13 18:26 ` David Brown
2013-05-13 18:26 ` David Brown
2013-05-13 18:26 ` David Brown
2013-05-14 8:32 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-05-14 8:32 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-05-14 8:32 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-05-13 9:44 ` [PATCH 09/14] ARM: mvebu: " Maxime Ripard
2013-05-13 9:44 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-05-13 9:44 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-05-13 15:19 ` Jason Cooper
2013-05-13 15:19 ` Jason Cooper
2013-05-13 15:19 ` Jason Cooper
2013-05-13 15:53 ` Maxime Ripard [this message]
2013-05-13 15:53 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-05-13 15:53 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-05-13 17:09 ` Olof Johansson
2013-05-13 17:09 ` Olof Johansson
2013-05-13 17:09 ` Olof Johansson
2013-05-13 9:44 ` [PATCH 10/14] ARM: mxs: " Maxime Ripard
2013-05-13 9:44 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-05-13 9:44 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-05-13 9:44 ` [PATCH 11/14] ARM: sirf: " Maxime Ripard
2013-05-13 9:44 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-05-13 9:44 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-05-14 9:17 ` Barry Song
2013-05-14 9:17 ` Barry Song
2013-05-14 9:17 ` Barry Song
2013-05-13 9:44 ` [PATCH 12/14] ARM: vexpress: " Maxime Ripard
2013-05-13 9:44 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-05-13 9:44 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-05-13 12:35 ` Pawel Moll
2013-05-13 12:35 ` Pawel Moll
2013-05-13 12:35 ` Pawel Moll
2013-05-13 9:44 ` [PATCH 13/14] ARM: virt: " Maxime Ripard
2013-05-13 9:44 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-05-13 9:44 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-05-13 9:44 ` [PATCH 14/14] ARM: vt8500: " Maxime Ripard
2013-05-13 9:44 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-05-13 9:44 ` Maxime Ripard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51910C81.5050501@free-electrons.com \
--to=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=baohua.song@csr.com \
--cc=csd@broadcom.com \
--cc=davidb@codeaurora.org \
--cc=gregory.clement@free-electrons.com \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=jamie@jamieiles.com \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@prisktech.co.nz \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
--cc=michal.simek@xilinx.com \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=shawn.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.