All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Xenomai] timeline for 2.6.2.2?
@ 2013-05-13 15:18 Daniel M. Drucker, Ph.D.
  2013-05-13 18:50 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Daniel M. Drucker, Ph.D. @ 2013-05-13 15:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: xenomai

Is there a planned 2.6.2.2? Could there be?

There are a few fixes since 2.6.2.1 we want, and it would ease our release
process a huge amount if we could use a released version instead of git
head.

Daniel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [Xenomai] timeline for 2.6.2.2?
  2013-05-13 15:18 [Xenomai] timeline for 2.6.2.2? Daniel M. Drucker, Ph.D.
@ 2013-05-13 18:50 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
  2013-05-14  7:39   ` Anders Blomdell
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Gilles Chanteperdrix @ 2013-05-13 18:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Daniel M. Drucker, Ph.D.; +Cc: xenomai

On 05/13/2013 05:18 PM, Daniel M. Drucker, Ph.D. wrote:

> Is there a planned 2.6.2.2? Could there be?
> 
> There are a few fixes since 2.6.2.1 we want, and it would ease our release
> process a huge amount if we could use a released version instead of git
> head.


2.6.3 is the next release. A todo list has been published here:
http://www.xenomai.org/pipermail/xenomai/2013-April/028147.html
the remaining item on the list is to update the manual pages
Then there are also some changes to be made on the debian packaging,
which should not take long, see:
http://www.xenomai.org/pipermail/xenomai/2013-April/028176.html

There is this new bug, which needs fixing:
http://www.xenomai.org/pipermail/xenomai/2013-May/028487.html
when that is done, we can issue a new I-pipe patch, then this I-pipe
patch whill have to be re-tested on all the test platforms we have. We
will then ask Paul to regenerate the Raspberry pre and post patches, as
he asked here:
http://www.xenomai.org/pipermail/xenomai/2013-April/028283.html

In parallel, we have another bug which needs fixing:
http://www.xenomai.org/pipermail/xenomai/2013-May/028453.html

When this is all fixed, we can compile and test the debian packages on
x86 platforms, with some luck, the linuxCNC guys will want to test them
as well on their platforms.

And when all this is done, we can release 2.6.3.

Regards.

-- 
                                                                Gilles.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [Xenomai] timeline for 2.6.2.2?
  2013-05-13 18:50 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
@ 2013-05-14  7:39   ` Anders Blomdell
  2013-05-14  7:52     ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Anders Blomdell @ 2013-05-14  7:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Gilles Chanteperdrix; +Cc: Daniel M. Drucker, Ph.D., xenomai

On 2013-05-13 20:50, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> On 05/13/2013 05:18 PM, Daniel M. Drucker, Ph.D. wrote:
>
>> Is there a planned 2.6.2.2? Could there be?
>>
>> There are a few fixes since 2.6.2.1 we want, and it would ease our release
>> process a huge amount if we could use a released version instead of git
>> head.
>
>
> 2.6.3 is the next release. A todo list has been published here:
> http://www.xenomai.org/pipermail/xenomai/2013-April/028147.html
Says:
   - x86: 3.5.7 with intel graphic card, try and find the source of high
     latencies

does this say that 2.6.3 ipipe will be based on 3.5.7? Then I'll have 
better to try track down the issue in:

http://www.xenomai.org/pipermail/xenomai/2013-March/027963.html

/Anders

-- 
Anders Blomdell                  Email: anders.blomdell@control.lth.se
Department of Automatic Control
Lund University                  Phone:    +46 46 222 4625
P.O. Box 118                     Fax:      +46 46 138118
SE-221 00 Lund, Sweden



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [Xenomai] timeline for 2.6.2.2?
  2013-05-14  7:39   ` Anders Blomdell
@ 2013-05-14  7:52     ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
  2013-05-14  7:58       ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Gilles Chanteperdrix @ 2013-05-14  7:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Anders Blomdell; +Cc: Daniel M. Drucker, Ph.D., xenomai

On 05/14/2013 09:39 AM, Anders Blomdell wrote:

> On 2013-05-13 20:50, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> On 05/13/2013 05:18 PM, Daniel M. Drucker, Ph.D. wrote:
>>
>>> Is there a planned 2.6.2.2? Could there be?
>>>
>>> There are a few fixes since 2.6.2.1 we want, and it would ease our release
>>> process a huge amount if we could use a released version instead of git
>>> head.
>>
>>
>> 2.6.3 is the next release. A todo list has been published here:
>> http://www.xenomai.org/pipermail/xenomai/2013-April/028147.html
> Says:
>    - x86: 3.5.7 with intel graphic card, try and find the source of high
>      latencies
> 
> does this say that 2.6.3 ipipe will be based on 3.5.7? Then I'll have 
> better to try track down the issue in:
> 
> http://www.xenomai.org/pipermail/xenomai/2013-March/027963.html


It will have a patch for 3.8, but the issue has been reported on 3.5.7,
but can be reproduced on 3.8.
I thought the issue you quote was solved?

-- 
                                                                Gilles.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [Xenomai] timeline for 2.6.2.2?
  2013-05-14  7:52     ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
@ 2013-05-14  7:58       ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
  2013-05-14 11:20         ` Anders Blomdell
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Gilles Chanteperdrix @ 2013-05-14  7:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Anders Blomdell; +Cc: Daniel M. Drucker, Ph.D., xenomai

On 05/14/2013 09:52 AM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:

> On 05/14/2013 09:39 AM, Anders Blomdell wrote:
> 
>> On 2013-05-13 20:50, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>> On 05/13/2013 05:18 PM, Daniel M. Drucker, Ph.D. wrote:
>>>
>>>> Is there a planned 2.6.2.2? Could there be?
>>>>
>>>> There are a few fixes since 2.6.2.1 we want, and it would ease our release
>>>> process a huge amount if we could use a released version instead of git
>>>> head.
>>>
>>>
>>> 2.6.3 is the next release. A todo list has been published here:
>>> http://www.xenomai.org/pipermail/xenomai/2013-April/028147.html
>> Says:
>>    - x86: 3.5.7 with intel graphic card, try and find the source of high
>>      latencies
>>
>> does this say that 2.6.3 ipipe will be based on 3.5.7? Then I'll have 
>> better to try track down the issue in:
>>
>> http://www.xenomai.org/pipermail/xenomai/2013-March/027963.html
> 
> 
> It will have a patch for 3.8, but the issue has been reported on 3.5.7,
> but can be reproduced on 3.8.
> I thought the issue you quote was solved?


And a Xenomai release is not tied with any particular release of the
I-pipe patch and supposed to support all the past I-pipe releases. There
just so happens that it is better tested with the latests I-pipe patch
it ships with.

-- 
                                                                Gilles.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [Xenomai] timeline for 2.6.2.2?
  2013-05-14  7:58       ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
@ 2013-05-14 11:20         ` Anders Blomdell
  2013-05-14 11:35           ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Anders Blomdell @ 2013-05-14 11:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Gilles Chanteperdrix; +Cc: Daniel M. Drucker, Ph.D., xenomai

On 2013-05-14 09:58, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> On 05/14/2013 09:52 AM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>
>> On 05/14/2013 09:39 AM, Anders Blomdell wrote:
>>
>>> On 2013-05-13 20:50, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>>> On 05/13/2013 05:18 PM, Daniel M. Drucker, Ph.D. wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Is there a planned 2.6.2.2? Could there be?
>>>>>
>>>>> There are a few fixes since 2.6.2.1 we want, and it would ease our release
>>>>> process a huge amount if we could use a released version instead of git
>>>>> head.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2.6.3 is the next release. A todo list has been published here:
>>>> http://www.xenomai.org/pipermail/xenomai/2013-April/028147.html
>>> Says:
>>>     - x86: 3.5.7 with intel graphic card, try and find the source of high
>>>       latencies
>>>
>>> does this say that 2.6.3 ipipe will be based on 3.5.7? Then I'll have
>>> better to try track down the issue in:
>>>
>>> http://www.xenomai.org/pipermail/xenomai/2013-March/027963.html
>>
>>
>> It will have a patch for 3.8,
Is that patch available for testing now (against 2.6.2.1)?

>> but the issue has been reported on 3.5.7,
>> but can be reproduced on 3.8.
>> I thought the issue you quote was solved?
Not for 3.5.7 on my main machine, the version form Jan's git seems to 
work OK on another machine.

>
>
> And a Xenomai release is not tied with any particular release of the
> I-pipe patch and supposed to support all the past I-pipe releases. There
> just so happens that it is better tested with the latests I-pipe patch
> it ships with.
I know.


/Anders

-- 
Anders Blomdell                  Email: anders.blomdell@control.lth.se
Department of Automatic Control
Lund University                  Phone:    +46 46 222 4625
P.O. Box 118                     Fax:      +46 46 138118
SE-221 00 Lund, Sweden



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [Xenomai] timeline for 2.6.2.2?
  2013-05-14 11:20         ` Anders Blomdell
@ 2013-05-14 11:35           ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Gilles Chanteperdrix @ 2013-05-14 11:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Anders Blomdell; +Cc: Daniel M. Drucker, Ph.D., xenomai

On 05/14/2013 01:20 PM, Anders Blomdell wrote:

> On 2013-05-14 09:58, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> On 05/14/2013 09:52 AM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>
>>> On 05/14/2013 09:39 AM, Anders Blomdell wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2013-05-13 20:50, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>>>> On 05/13/2013 05:18 PM, Daniel M. Drucker, Ph.D. wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Is there a planned 2.6.2.2? Could there be?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There are a few fixes since 2.6.2.1 we want, and it would ease our release
>>>>>> process a huge amount if we could use a released version instead of git
>>>>>> head.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2.6.3 is the next release. A todo list has been published here:
>>>>> http://www.xenomai.org/pipermail/xenomai/2013-April/028147.html
>>>> Says:
>>>>     - x86: 3.5.7 with intel graphic card, try and find the source of high
>>>>       latencies
>>>>
>>>> does this say that 2.6.3 ipipe will be based on 3.5.7? Then I'll have
>>>> better to try track down the issue in:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.xenomai.org/pipermail/xenomai/2013-March/027963.html
>>>
>>>
>>> It will have a patch for 3.8,
> Is that patch available for testing now (against 2.6.2.1)?


Nothing blocks its release on my side now, it turns out the bug that was
blocking it was a compiler bug. But, just right now, the work on linux
3.8 is only available in git trees. It will not work with 2.6.2.1 as
some linux kernel API changes required some changes in Xenomai code,
only available in xenomai git.

-- 
                                                                Gilles.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2013-05-14 11:35 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-05-13 15:18 [Xenomai] timeline for 2.6.2.2? Daniel M. Drucker, Ph.D.
2013-05-13 18:50 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2013-05-14  7:39   ` Anders Blomdell
2013-05-14  7:52     ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2013-05-14  7:58       ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2013-05-14 11:20         ` Anders Blomdell
2013-05-14 11:35           ` Gilles Chanteperdrix

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.