All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Glauber Costa <glommer-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david-FqsqvQoI3Ljby3iVrkZq2A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org,
	cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	Andrew Morton
	<akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>,
	Greg Thelen <gthelen-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	kamezawa.hiroyu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	Dave Chinner <dchinner-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 09/31] dcache: convert to use new lru list infrastructure
Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 18:01:22 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <519243B2.8030102@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130514065902.GG29466@dastard>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2662 bytes --]

On 05/14/2013 10:59 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 10:13:30PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote:
>> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
>>
>> [ glommer: don't reintroduce double decrement of nr_unused_dentries,
>>   adapted for new LRU return codes ]
>> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
>> ---
> 
> I'm seeing a panic on startup in d_kill() with an invalid d_child
> list entry with this patch. I haven't got to the bottom of it yet.
> 

My wild guess is that your patch does not prune correctly, as I
described in my last message.

> .....
> 
>>  void shrink_dcache_sb(struct super_block *sb)
>>  {
>> -	LIST_HEAD(tmp);
>> -
>> -	spin_lock(&sb->s_dentry_lru_lock);
>> -	while (!list_empty(&sb->s_dentry_lru)) {
>> -		list_splice_init(&sb->s_dentry_lru, &tmp);
>> -
>> -		/*
>> -		 * account for removal here so we don't need to handle it later
>> -		 * even though the dentry is no longer on the lru list.
>> -		 */
>> -		this_cpu_sub(nr_dentry_unused, sb->s_nr_dentry_unused);
>> -		sb->s_nr_dentry_unused = 0;
>> -
>> -		spin_unlock(&sb->s_dentry_lru_lock);
>> -		shrink_dcache_list(&tmp);
>> -		spin_lock(&sb->s_dentry_lru_lock);
>> -	}
>> -	spin_unlock(&sb->s_dentry_lru_lock);
>> +	list_lru_dispose_all(&sb->s_dentry_lru, shrink_dcache_list);
>>  }
>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(shrink_dcache_sb);
> 
> And here comes the fun part. This doesn't account for the
> dentries that are freed from the superblock here.
> 
> So, it needs to be something like:
> 
> void shrink_dcache_sb(struct super_block *sb)
> {
> 	unsigned long disposed;
> 
> 	disposed = list_lru_dispose_all(&sb->s_dentry_lru,
> 					shrink_dcache_list);
> 
> 	this_cpu_sub(nr_dentry_unused, disposed);
> }
> 
> But, therein lies a problem. nr_dentry_unused is a 32 bit counter,
> and we can return a 64 bit value here. So that means we have to bump
> nr_dentry_unused to a long, not an int for these per-cpu counters to
> work.
> 
> And then there's the problem that the sum of these counters only
> uses an int. Which means if we get large numbers of negative values
> on different CPU from unmounts, the summation will end up
> overflowing and it'll all suck.
> 
> So, Glauber, what do you reckon? I've never likes this stupid
> hand-rolled per-cpu counter stuff, and it's causing issues. Should
> we just convert them to generic per-cpu counters because they are
> 64bit clean and just handle out-of-range sums in the /proc update
> code?
> 

One option would be to add the following patch to the beginning of the
series.




[-- Attachment #2: dentry.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 2952 bytes --]

diff --git a/fs/dcache.c b/fs/dcache.c
index 3a3adc4..a8be4c9 100644
--- a/fs/dcache.c
+++ b/fs/dcache.c
@@ -116,12 +116,12 @@ struct dentry_stat_t dentry_stat = {
 	.age_limit = 45,
 };
 
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned int, nr_dentry);
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned int, nr_dentry_unused);
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(long, nr_dentry);
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(long, nr_dentry_unused);
 
 #if defined(CONFIG_SYSCTL) && defined(CONFIG_PROC_FS)
 /* scan possible cpus instead of online and avoid worrying about CPU hotplug. */
-static int get_nr_dentry(void)
+static long get_nr_dentry(void)
 {
 	int i;
 	int sum = 0;
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ static int get_nr_dentry(void)
 	return sum < 0 ? 0 : sum;
 }
 
-static int get_nr_dentry_unused(void)
+static long get_nr_dentry_unused(void)
 {
 	int i;
 	int sum = 0;
@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ int proc_nr_dentry(ctl_table *table, int write, void __user *buffer,
 {
 	dentry_stat.nr_dentry = get_nr_dentry();
 	dentry_stat.nr_unused = get_nr_dentry_unused();
-	return proc_dointvec(table, write, buffer, lenp, ppos);
+	return proc_doulongvec_minmax(table, write, buffer, lenp, ppos);
 }
 #endif
 
diff --git a/include/linux/dcache.h b/include/linux/dcache.h
index 4d24a12..bd08285 100644
--- a/include/linux/dcache.h
+++ b/include/linux/dcache.h
@@ -54,11 +54,11 @@ struct qstr {
 #define hashlen_len(hashlen)  ((u32)((hashlen) >> 32))
 
 struct dentry_stat_t {
-	int nr_dentry;
-	int nr_unused;
-	int age_limit;          /* age in seconds */
-	int want_pages;         /* pages requested by system */
-	int dummy[2];
+	long nr_dentry;
+	long nr_unused;
+	long age_limit;          /* age in seconds */
+	long want_pages;         /* pages requested by system */
+	long dummy[2];
 };
 extern struct dentry_stat_t dentry_stat;
 
diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index 67e1040..e875f60 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -1267,12 +1267,12 @@ struct super_block {
 	/* s_dentry_lru_lock protects s_dentry_lru and s_nr_dentry_unused */
 	spinlock_t		s_dentry_lru_lock ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
 	struct list_head	s_dentry_lru;	/* unused dentry lru */
-	int			s_nr_dentry_unused;	/* # of dentry on lru */
+	long			s_nr_dentry_unused;	/* # of dentry on lru */
 
 	/* s_inode_lru_lock protects s_inode_lru and s_nr_inodes_unused */
 	spinlock_t		s_inode_lru_lock ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
 	struct list_head	s_inode_lru;		/* unused inode lru */
-	int			s_nr_inodes_unused;	/* # of inodes on lru */
+	long			s_nr_inodes_unused;	/* # of inodes on lru */
 
 	struct block_device	*s_bdev;
 	struct backing_dev_info *s_bdi;
diff --git a/kernel/sysctl.c b/kernel/sysctl.c
index 9edcf45..0dc51c0 100644
--- a/kernel/sysctl.c
+++ b/kernel/sysctl.c
@@ -1493,7 +1493,7 @@ static struct ctl_table fs_table[] = {
 	{
 		.procname	= "dentry-state",
 		.data		= &dentry_stat,
-		.maxlen		= 6*sizeof(int),
+		.maxlen		= 6*sizeof(long),
 		.mode		= 0444,
 		.proc_handler	= proc_nr_dentry,
 	},

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Glauber Costa <glommer-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david-FqsqvQoI3Ljby3iVrkZq2A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	<linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>,
	<cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	Andrew Morton
	<akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>,
	Greg Thelen <gthelen-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	<kamezawa.hiroyu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>,
	<linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	Dave Chinner <dchinner-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 09/31] dcache: convert to use new lru list infrastructure
Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 18:01:22 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <519243B2.8030102@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130514065902.GG29466@dastard>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2662 bytes --]

On 05/14/2013 10:59 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 10:13:30PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote:
>> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
>>
>> [ glommer: don't reintroduce double decrement of nr_unused_dentries,
>>   adapted for new LRU return codes ]
>> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
>> ---
> 
> I'm seeing a panic on startup in d_kill() with an invalid d_child
> list entry with this patch. I haven't got to the bottom of it yet.
> 

My wild guess is that your patch does not prune correctly, as I
described in my last message.

> .....
> 
>>  void shrink_dcache_sb(struct super_block *sb)
>>  {
>> -	LIST_HEAD(tmp);
>> -
>> -	spin_lock(&sb->s_dentry_lru_lock);
>> -	while (!list_empty(&sb->s_dentry_lru)) {
>> -		list_splice_init(&sb->s_dentry_lru, &tmp);
>> -
>> -		/*
>> -		 * account for removal here so we don't need to handle it later
>> -		 * even though the dentry is no longer on the lru list.
>> -		 */
>> -		this_cpu_sub(nr_dentry_unused, sb->s_nr_dentry_unused);
>> -		sb->s_nr_dentry_unused = 0;
>> -
>> -		spin_unlock(&sb->s_dentry_lru_lock);
>> -		shrink_dcache_list(&tmp);
>> -		spin_lock(&sb->s_dentry_lru_lock);
>> -	}
>> -	spin_unlock(&sb->s_dentry_lru_lock);
>> +	list_lru_dispose_all(&sb->s_dentry_lru, shrink_dcache_list);
>>  }
>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(shrink_dcache_sb);
> 
> And here comes the fun part. This doesn't account for the
> dentries that are freed from the superblock here.
> 
> So, it needs to be something like:
> 
> void shrink_dcache_sb(struct super_block *sb)
> {
> 	unsigned long disposed;
> 
> 	disposed = list_lru_dispose_all(&sb->s_dentry_lru,
> 					shrink_dcache_list);
> 
> 	this_cpu_sub(nr_dentry_unused, disposed);
> }
> 
> But, therein lies a problem. nr_dentry_unused is a 32 bit counter,
> and we can return a 64 bit value here. So that means we have to bump
> nr_dentry_unused to a long, not an int for these per-cpu counters to
> work.
> 
> And then there's the problem that the sum of these counters only
> uses an int. Which means if we get large numbers of negative values
> on different CPU from unmounts, the summation will end up
> overflowing and it'll all suck.
> 
> So, Glauber, what do you reckon? I've never likes this stupid
> hand-rolled per-cpu counter stuff, and it's causing issues. Should
> we just convert them to generic per-cpu counters because they are
> 64bit clean and just handle out-of-range sums in the /proc update
> code?
> 

One option would be to add the following patch to the beginning of the
series.




[-- Attachment #2: dentry.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 2952 bytes --]

diff --git a/fs/dcache.c b/fs/dcache.c
index 3a3adc4..a8be4c9 100644
--- a/fs/dcache.c
+++ b/fs/dcache.c
@@ -116,12 +116,12 @@ struct dentry_stat_t dentry_stat = {
 	.age_limit = 45,
 };
 
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned int, nr_dentry);
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned int, nr_dentry_unused);
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(long, nr_dentry);
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(long, nr_dentry_unused);
 
 #if defined(CONFIG_SYSCTL) && defined(CONFIG_PROC_FS)
 /* scan possible cpus instead of online and avoid worrying about CPU hotplug. */
-static int get_nr_dentry(void)
+static long get_nr_dentry(void)
 {
 	int i;
 	int sum = 0;
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ static int get_nr_dentry(void)
 	return sum < 0 ? 0 : sum;
 }
 
-static int get_nr_dentry_unused(void)
+static long get_nr_dentry_unused(void)
 {
 	int i;
 	int sum = 0;
@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ int proc_nr_dentry(ctl_table *table, int write, void __user *buffer,
 {
 	dentry_stat.nr_dentry = get_nr_dentry();
 	dentry_stat.nr_unused = get_nr_dentry_unused();
-	return proc_dointvec(table, write, buffer, lenp, ppos);
+	return proc_doulongvec_minmax(table, write, buffer, lenp, ppos);
 }
 #endif
 
diff --git a/include/linux/dcache.h b/include/linux/dcache.h
index 4d24a12..bd08285 100644
--- a/include/linux/dcache.h
+++ b/include/linux/dcache.h
@@ -54,11 +54,11 @@ struct qstr {
 #define hashlen_len(hashlen)  ((u32)((hashlen) >> 32))
 
 struct dentry_stat_t {
-	int nr_dentry;
-	int nr_unused;
-	int age_limit;          /* age in seconds */
-	int want_pages;         /* pages requested by system */
-	int dummy[2];
+	long nr_dentry;
+	long nr_unused;
+	long age_limit;          /* age in seconds */
+	long want_pages;         /* pages requested by system */
+	long dummy[2];
 };
 extern struct dentry_stat_t dentry_stat;
 
diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index 67e1040..e875f60 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -1267,12 +1267,12 @@ struct super_block {
 	/* s_dentry_lru_lock protects s_dentry_lru and s_nr_dentry_unused */
 	spinlock_t		s_dentry_lru_lock ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
 	struct list_head	s_dentry_lru;	/* unused dentry lru */
-	int			s_nr_dentry_unused;	/* # of dentry on lru */
+	long			s_nr_dentry_unused;	/* # of dentry on lru */
 
 	/* s_inode_lru_lock protects s_inode_lru and s_nr_inodes_unused */
 	spinlock_t		s_inode_lru_lock ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
 	struct list_head	s_inode_lru;		/* unused inode lru */
-	int			s_nr_inodes_unused;	/* # of inodes on lru */
+	long			s_nr_inodes_unused;	/* # of inodes on lru */
 
 	struct block_device	*s_bdev;
 	struct backing_dev_info *s_bdi;
diff --git a/kernel/sysctl.c b/kernel/sysctl.c
index 9edcf45..0dc51c0 100644
--- a/kernel/sysctl.c
+++ b/kernel/sysctl.c
@@ -1493,7 +1493,7 @@ static struct ctl_table fs_table[] = {
 	{
 		.procname	= "dentry-state",
 		.data		= &dentry_stat,
-		.maxlen		= 6*sizeof(int),
+		.maxlen		= 6*sizeof(long),
 		.mode		= 0444,
 		.proc_handler	= proc_nr_dentry,
 	},

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@openvz.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>,
	kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 09/31] dcache: convert to use new lru list infrastructure
Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 18:01:22 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <519243B2.8030102@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130514065902.GG29466@dastard>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2575 bytes --]

On 05/14/2013 10:59 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 10:13:30PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote:
>> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
>>
>> [ glommer: don't reintroduce double decrement of nr_unused_dentries,
>>   adapted for new LRU return codes ]
>> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@openvz.org>
>> ---
> 
> I'm seeing a panic on startup in d_kill() with an invalid d_child
> list entry with this patch. I haven't got to the bottom of it yet.
> 

My wild guess is that your patch does not prune correctly, as I
described in my last message.

> .....
> 
>>  void shrink_dcache_sb(struct super_block *sb)
>>  {
>> -	LIST_HEAD(tmp);
>> -
>> -	spin_lock(&sb->s_dentry_lru_lock);
>> -	while (!list_empty(&sb->s_dentry_lru)) {
>> -		list_splice_init(&sb->s_dentry_lru, &tmp);
>> -
>> -		/*
>> -		 * account for removal here so we don't need to handle it later
>> -		 * even though the dentry is no longer on the lru list.
>> -		 */
>> -		this_cpu_sub(nr_dentry_unused, sb->s_nr_dentry_unused);
>> -		sb->s_nr_dentry_unused = 0;
>> -
>> -		spin_unlock(&sb->s_dentry_lru_lock);
>> -		shrink_dcache_list(&tmp);
>> -		spin_lock(&sb->s_dentry_lru_lock);
>> -	}
>> -	spin_unlock(&sb->s_dentry_lru_lock);
>> +	list_lru_dispose_all(&sb->s_dentry_lru, shrink_dcache_list);
>>  }
>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(shrink_dcache_sb);
> 
> And here comes the fun part. This doesn't account for the
> dentries that are freed from the superblock here.
> 
> So, it needs to be something like:
> 
> void shrink_dcache_sb(struct super_block *sb)
> {
> 	unsigned long disposed;
> 
> 	disposed = list_lru_dispose_all(&sb->s_dentry_lru,
> 					shrink_dcache_list);
> 
> 	this_cpu_sub(nr_dentry_unused, disposed);
> }
> 
> But, therein lies a problem. nr_dentry_unused is a 32 bit counter,
> and we can return a 64 bit value here. So that means we have to bump
> nr_dentry_unused to a long, not an int for these per-cpu counters to
> work.
> 
> And then there's the problem that the sum of these counters only
> uses an int. Which means if we get large numbers of negative values
> on different CPU from unmounts, the summation will end up
> overflowing and it'll all suck.
> 
> So, Glauber, what do you reckon? I've never likes this stupid
> hand-rolled per-cpu counter stuff, and it's causing issues. Should
> we just convert them to generic per-cpu counters because they are
> 64bit clean and just handle out-of-range sums in the /proc update
> code?
> 

One option would be to add the following patch to the beginning of the
series.




[-- Attachment #2: dentry.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 2952 bytes --]

diff --git a/fs/dcache.c b/fs/dcache.c
index 3a3adc4..a8be4c9 100644
--- a/fs/dcache.c
+++ b/fs/dcache.c
@@ -116,12 +116,12 @@ struct dentry_stat_t dentry_stat = {
 	.age_limit = 45,
 };
 
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned int, nr_dentry);
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned int, nr_dentry_unused);
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(long, nr_dentry);
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(long, nr_dentry_unused);
 
 #if defined(CONFIG_SYSCTL) && defined(CONFIG_PROC_FS)
 /* scan possible cpus instead of online and avoid worrying about CPU hotplug. */
-static int get_nr_dentry(void)
+static long get_nr_dentry(void)
 {
 	int i;
 	int sum = 0;
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ static int get_nr_dentry(void)
 	return sum < 0 ? 0 : sum;
 }
 
-static int get_nr_dentry_unused(void)
+static long get_nr_dentry_unused(void)
 {
 	int i;
 	int sum = 0;
@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ int proc_nr_dentry(ctl_table *table, int write, void __user *buffer,
 {
 	dentry_stat.nr_dentry = get_nr_dentry();
 	dentry_stat.nr_unused = get_nr_dentry_unused();
-	return proc_dointvec(table, write, buffer, lenp, ppos);
+	return proc_doulongvec_minmax(table, write, buffer, lenp, ppos);
 }
 #endif
 
diff --git a/include/linux/dcache.h b/include/linux/dcache.h
index 4d24a12..bd08285 100644
--- a/include/linux/dcache.h
+++ b/include/linux/dcache.h
@@ -54,11 +54,11 @@ struct qstr {
 #define hashlen_len(hashlen)  ((u32)((hashlen) >> 32))
 
 struct dentry_stat_t {
-	int nr_dentry;
-	int nr_unused;
-	int age_limit;          /* age in seconds */
-	int want_pages;         /* pages requested by system */
-	int dummy[2];
+	long nr_dentry;
+	long nr_unused;
+	long age_limit;          /* age in seconds */
+	long want_pages;         /* pages requested by system */
+	long dummy[2];
 };
 extern struct dentry_stat_t dentry_stat;
 
diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index 67e1040..e875f60 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -1267,12 +1267,12 @@ struct super_block {
 	/* s_dentry_lru_lock protects s_dentry_lru and s_nr_dentry_unused */
 	spinlock_t		s_dentry_lru_lock ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
 	struct list_head	s_dentry_lru;	/* unused dentry lru */
-	int			s_nr_dentry_unused;	/* # of dentry on lru */
+	long			s_nr_dentry_unused;	/* # of dentry on lru */
 
 	/* s_inode_lru_lock protects s_inode_lru and s_nr_inodes_unused */
 	spinlock_t		s_inode_lru_lock ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
 	struct list_head	s_inode_lru;		/* unused inode lru */
-	int			s_nr_inodes_unused;	/* # of inodes on lru */
+	long			s_nr_inodes_unused;	/* # of inodes on lru */
 
 	struct block_device	*s_bdev;
 	struct backing_dev_info *s_bdi;
diff --git a/kernel/sysctl.c b/kernel/sysctl.c
index 9edcf45..0dc51c0 100644
--- a/kernel/sysctl.c
+++ b/kernel/sysctl.c
@@ -1493,7 +1493,7 @@ static struct ctl_table fs_table[] = {
 	{
 		.procname	= "dentry-state",
 		.data		= &dentry_stat,
-		.maxlen		= 6*sizeof(int),
+		.maxlen		= 6*sizeof(long),
 		.mode		= 0444,
 		.proc_handler	= proc_nr_dentry,
 	},

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-05-14 14:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 151+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-12 18:13 [PATCH v6 00/31] kmemcg shrinkers Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13 ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13 ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13 ` [PATCH v6 01/31] super: fix calculation of shrinkable objects for small numbers Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13   ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13 ` [PATCH v6 02/31] dcache: convert dentry_stat.nr_unused to per-cpu counters Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13   ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13   ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13 ` [PATCH v6 03/31] dentry: move to per-sb LRU locks Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13   ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13   ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13 ` [PATCH v6 04/31] dcache: remove dentries from LRU before putting on dispose list Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13   ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13   ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-14  2:02   ` Dave Chinner
2013-05-14  5:46   ` [PATCH v7 " Dave Chinner
2013-05-14  7:10     ` Dave Chinner
2013-05-14 12:43     ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-14 12:43       ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-14 12:43       ` Glauber Costa
     [not found]       ` <51923158.7040002-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
2013-05-14 20:32         ` Dave Chinner
2013-05-14 20:32           ` Dave Chinner
2013-05-12 18:13 ` [PATCH v6 05/31] mm: new shrinker API Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13   ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13   ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13 ` [PATCH v6 06/31] shrinker: convert superblock shrinkers to new API Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13   ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13   ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13 ` [PATCH v6 07/31] list: add a new LRU list type Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13   ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13   ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-13  9:25   ` Mel Gorman
2013-05-12 18:13 ` [PATCH v6 08/31] inode: convert inode lru list to generic lru list code Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13   ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13   ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13 ` [PATCH v6 09/31] dcache: convert to use new lru list infrastructure Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13   ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13   ` Glauber Costa
     [not found]   ` <1368382432-25462-10-git-send-email-glommer-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2013-05-14  6:59     ` Dave Chinner
2013-05-14  6:59       ` Dave Chinner
2013-05-14  7:50       ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-14  7:50         ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-14 14:01       ` Glauber Costa [this message]
2013-05-14 14:01         ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-14 14:01         ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13 ` [PATCH v6 10/31] list_lru: per-node " Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13   ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13   ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13 ` [PATCH v6 11/31] shrinker: add node awareness Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13   ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13   ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13 ` [PATCH v6 12/31] fs: convert inode and dentry shrinking to be node aware Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13   ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13   ` Glauber Costa
     [not found]   ` <1368382432-25462-13-git-send-email-glommer-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2013-05-14  9:52     ` Dave Chinner
2013-05-14  9:52       ` Dave Chinner
2013-05-15 15:27       ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-15 15:27         ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-15 15:27         ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-16  0:02         ` Dave Chinner
2013-05-16  8:03           ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-16  8:03             ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-16  8:03             ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-16 19:14           ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-16 19:14             ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-17  0:51             ` Dave Chinner
2013-05-17  7:29               ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-17  7:29                 ` Glauber Costa
     [not found]                 ` <5195DC59.8000205-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
2013-05-17 14:49                   ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-17 14:49                     ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-17 14:49                     ` Glauber Costa
     [not found]                     ` <51964381.8010406-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
2013-05-17 22:54                       ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-17 22:54                         ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-17 22:54                         ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-18  3:39                     ` Dave Chinner
2013-05-18  7:20                       ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-18  7:20                         ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-18  7:20                         ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13 ` [PATCH v6 13/31] xfs: convert buftarg LRU to generic code Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13   ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13   ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13 ` [PATCH v6 14/31] xfs: convert dquot cache lru to list_lru Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13   ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13   ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13 ` [PATCH v6 15/31] fs: convert fs shrinkers to new scan/count API Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13   ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13   ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-13  6:12   ` Artem Bityutskiy
     [not found]     ` <1368425530.3208.13.camel-Bxnoe/o8FG+Ef9UqXRslZEEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
2013-05-13  7:28       ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-13  7:28         ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-13  7:28         ` Glauber Costa
     [not found]         ` <51909610.1010801-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
2013-05-13  7:43           ` Artem Bityutskiy
2013-05-13  7:43             ` Artem Bityutskiy
2013-05-13 10:36   ` Jan Kara
2013-05-12 18:13 ` [PATCH v6 16/31] drivers: convert shrinkers to new count/scan API Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13   ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13   ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13 ` [PATCH v6 17/31] i915: bail out earlier when shrinker cannot acquire mutex Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13   ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13   ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13 ` [PATCH v6 18/31] shrinker: convert remaining shrinkers to count/scan API Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13   ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13   ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13 ` [PATCH v6 19/31] hugepage: convert huge zero page shrinker to new shrinker API Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13   ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13   ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13 ` [PATCH v6 20/31] shrinker: Kill old ->shrink API Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13   ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13   ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13 ` [PATCH v6 21/31] vmscan: also shrink slab in memcg pressure Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13   ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13   ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13 ` [PATCH v6 22/31] memcg,list_lru: duplicate LRUs upon kmemcg creation Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13   ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13   ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13 ` [PATCH v6 23/31] lru: add an element to a memcg list Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13   ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13 ` [PATCH v6 24/31] list_lru: per-memcg walks Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13   ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13   ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13 ` [PATCH v6 25/31] memcg: per-memcg kmem shrinking Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13   ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13   ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13 ` [PATCH v6 26/31] memcg: scan cache objects hierarchically Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13   ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13   ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13 ` [PATCH v6 27/31] vmscan: take at least one pass with shrinkers Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13   ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13 ` [PATCH v6 28/31] super: targeted memcg reclaim Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13   ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13   ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13 ` [PATCH v6 29/31] memcg: move initialization to memcg creation Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13   ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13   ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13 ` [PATCH v6 30/31] vmpressure: in-kernel notifications Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13   ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13   ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13 ` [PATCH v6 31/31] memcg: reap dead memcgs upon global memory pressure Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13   ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13   ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-13  7:14 ` [PATCH v6 00/31] kmemcg shrinkers Dave Chinner
2013-05-13  7:21   ` Dave Chinner
2013-05-13  8:00   ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-13  8:00     ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-13  8:00     ` Glauber Costa
     [not found]     ` <51909D84.7040800-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
2013-05-14  1:48       ` Dave Chinner
2013-05-14  1:48         ` Dave Chinner
2013-05-14  5:22         ` Dave Chinner
2013-05-14  5:45           ` Dave Chinner
2013-05-14  7:38           ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-14  7:38             ` Glauber Costa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=519243B2.8030102@parallels.com \
    --to=glommer-bzqdu9zft3wakbo8gow8eq@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=david-FqsqvQoI3Ljby3iVrkZq2A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=dchinner-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=glommer-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=gthelen-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=mhocko-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.