Re: [PATCH v10 00/35] kmemcg shrinkers

[Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>]

On 06/06/2013 11:47 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Jun 2013 11:37:03 +0400 Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 06/06/2013 11:18 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>> The shrinker stuff seems sensible and straightforward and I expect we
>>> can proceed with that at the normal pace.  The memcg changes struck me
>>> as being hairy as hell and I'd really like to see the other memcg
>>> people go through it carefully.
>>>
>>> Of course, "new series" doesn't give you an easily accessible tree to
>>> target.  I could drop it all again to give you a clean shot at
>>> tomorrow's -next?
>> If you just keep them on top (not really sure how hard it is for you), I
>> can just remove them all and apply a new series on top.
> 
> I could do that but then anyone else who wants to test the code has to
> do the same thing.  Dropping them out of -next does seem the clean
> approach.
> 
> We still need to work out what to do with
> memcg-debugging-facility-to-access-dangling-memcgs.patch btw.  See
> other email.
> 
Ok. I am using half of that as official infrastructure now. I will reply
to your comments when I reach that.