From: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>, <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
<stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen/pci: Deal with toolstack missing an 'XenbusStateClosing'.
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 16:36:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51B743EA.5020800@eu.citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1370898399-20968-2-git-send-email-konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
On 06/10/2013 10:06 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> There are two tool-stack that can instruct the Xen PCI frontend
> and backend to change states: 'xm' (Python code with a daemon),
> and 'xl' (C library - does not keep state changes).
>
> With the 'xm', the path to disconnect a PCI device (xm pci-detach
> <guest> <BDF>)is:
>
> 4(Connected)->7(Reconfiguring*)-> 8(Reconfigured)-> 4(Connected)->5(Closing*).
>
> The * is for states that the tool-stack sets. For 'xl', it is similar:
>
> 4(Connected)->7(Reconfiguring*)-> 8(Reconfigured)-> 4(Connected)
>
> Both of them also tear down the XenBus structure, so the backend
> state ends up going in the 3(Initialised) and calls pcifront_xenbus_remove.
So I looked a little bit into this; there are actually two different
states that happen as part of this handshake. In order to disonnect a
*device*, xl signals using the *bus* state, like this:
* Wait for the *bus* to be in state 4(Connected)
* Set the *device* state to 5(Closing)
* Set the *bus* state to 7(Reconfiguring)
* Wait for the *bus* state to return to 4(Connected)
So are all of these states you see the *bus* state? And why would you
disconnect the whole pci bus if you're only removing one device?
-George
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen/pci: Deal with toolstack missing an 'XenbusStateClosing'.
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 16:36:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51B743EA.5020800@eu.citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1370898399-20968-2-git-send-email-konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
On 06/10/2013 10:06 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> There are two tool-stack that can instruct the Xen PCI frontend
> and backend to change states: 'xm' (Python code with a daemon),
> and 'xl' (C library - does not keep state changes).
>
> With the 'xm', the path to disconnect a PCI device (xm pci-detach
> <guest> <BDF>)is:
>
> 4(Connected)->7(Reconfiguring*)-> 8(Reconfigured)-> 4(Connected)->5(Closing*).
>
> The * is for states that the tool-stack sets. For 'xl', it is similar:
>
> 4(Connected)->7(Reconfiguring*)-> 8(Reconfigured)-> 4(Connected)
>
> Both of them also tear down the XenBus structure, so the backend
> state ends up going in the 3(Initialised) and calls pcifront_xenbus_remove.
So I looked a little bit into this; there are actually two different
states that happen as part of this handshake. In order to disonnect a
*device*, xl signals using the *bus* state, like this:
* Wait for the *bus* to be in state 4(Connected)
* Set the *device* state to 5(Closing)
* Set the *bus* state to 7(Reconfiguring)
* Wait for the *bus* state to return to 4(Connected)
So are all of these states you see the *bus* state? And why would you
disconnect the whole pci bus if you're only removing one device?
-George
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-11 15:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-07 15:45 xl pci-detach vs xm pci-detach in Xen 4.3 (one works, the other does not) Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-06-10 11:12 ` George Dunlap
2013-06-10 11:15 ` Processed: " xen
2013-06-10 13:20 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-06-10 13:28 ` George Dunlap
2013-06-10 13:30 ` Processed: " xen
2013-06-10 20:24 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-06-10 20:30 ` Processed: " xen
[not found] ` <20131104202224.GA18449@phenom.dumpdata.com>
2013-11-04 20:30 ` Processed: " xen
2013-11-04 20:39 ` Wei Liu
2013-11-04 20:45 ` Processed: " xen
2013-06-10 21:06 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-06-10 21:06 ` (unknown), Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-06-10 21:06 ` [PATCH] xen/pci: Deal with toolstack missing an 'XenbusStateClosing' Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-06-11 7:29 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2013-06-11 9:00 ` George Dunlap
2013-06-11 9:00 ` [Xen-devel] " George Dunlap
2013-06-11 13:03 ` konrad wilk
2013-06-11 13:03 ` konrad wilk
2013-06-11 7:29 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-11 15:36 ` George Dunlap [this message]
2013-06-11 15:36 ` George Dunlap
2013-06-11 16:08 ` konrad wilk
2013-06-11 16:17 ` George Dunlap
2013-06-11 16:17 ` George Dunlap
2013-06-11 16:24 ` konrad wilk
2013-06-12 13:45 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-06-12 13:47 ` George Dunlap
2013-06-12 13:47 ` George Dunlap
2013-06-12 14:27 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-06-12 17:28 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-06-14 16:28 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-11-04 20:43 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-11-04 20:56 ` Ben Guthro
[not found] ` <20131104205917.GA18696@phenom.dumpdata.com>
2013-11-04 21:15 ` Processed: " xen
2013-06-10 13:30 ` Processed: Re: xl pci-detach vs xm pci-detach in Xen 4.3 (one works, the other does not) xen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51B743EA.5020800@eu.citrix.com \
--to=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.