From: Michael Trimarchi <michael@amarulasolutions.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] gpio: spear_gpio: Fix gpio_set_value() implementation
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 08:42:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51C3F5EA.2050506@amarulasolutions.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51C3D94D.1030507@st.com>
On 06/21/2013 06:40 AM, Vipin Kumar wrote:
> On 6/20/2013 7:26 PM, Axel Lin wrote:
>> 2013/6/20 Marek Vasut<marex@denx.de>
>>>
>>> Dear Axel Lin,
>>>
>>>> In current gpio_set_value() implementation, it always sets the gpio control
>>>> bit no matter the value argument is 0 or 1. Thus the GPIOs never set to
>>>> low. This patch fixes this bug.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin<axel.lin@ingics.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/gpio/spear_gpio.c | 5 ++++-
>>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/spear_gpio.c b/drivers/gpio/spear_gpio.c
>>>> index d3c728e..8878608 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpio/spear_gpio.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpio/spear_gpio.c
>>>> @@ -52,7 +52,10 @@ int gpio_set_value(unsigned gpio, int value)
>>>> {
>>>> struct gpio_regs *regs = (struct gpio_regs *)CONFIG_GPIO_BASE;
>>>>
>>>> - writel(1<< gpio,®s->gpiodata[DATA_REG_ADDR(gpio)]);
>>>> + if (value)
>>>> + writel(1<< gpio,®s->gpiodata[DATA_REG_ADDR(gpio)]);
>>>> + else
>>>> + writel(0,®s->gpiodata[DATA_REG_ADDR(gpio)]);
>>>
>>> How can this possibly work? Writing 0 to the whole bank will unset all the
>>> GPIOs, no ?
>>
>>
>> Because each GPIO is controlled by a register.
>> And only one bit will be set when set gpio to high.
>>
>> So it's safe to write 0 for clearing the bit.
>>
>> Note, the gpio_get_value() implementation also assumes there is only one bit
>> will be set. ( If this is not true, both gpio_get_value() and gpio_set_value()
>> need fix.)
>>
>> Vipin, can you review this patch and confirm this behavior?
>>
>
> Yes this is right. and the code is fine
>
The problem is not in set one bit but in reset one bit. Can you check
the else path?
Michael
> Regards
> Vipin
>
>> Thanks,
>> Axel
>> .
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> U-Boot mailing list
> U-Boot at lists.denx.de
> http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-21 6:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-20 7:13 [U-Boot] [PATCH] gpio: spear_gpio: Fix gpio_set_value() implementation Axel Lin
2013-06-20 7:22 ` Stefan Roese
2013-06-20 13:09 ` Michael Trimarchi
2013-06-20 13:57 ` Marek Vasut
2013-06-20 15:04 ` Michael Trimarchi
2013-06-20 15:11 ` Marek Vasut
2013-06-20 13:44 ` Marek Vasut
2013-06-20 13:56 ` Axel Lin
2013-06-20 20:02 ` Michael Trimarchi
2013-06-20 20:16 ` Marek Vasut
2013-06-21 4:40 ` Vipin Kumar
2013-06-21 6:42 ` Michael Trimarchi [this message]
2013-06-30 4:18 ` Axel Lin
2013-06-30 8:10 ` Michael Trimarchi
2013-06-30 8:57 ` Axel Lin
2013-07-01 4:27 ` Vipin Kumar
2013-07-01 5:32 ` Axel Lin
2013-07-01 6:21 ` Vipin Kumar
2013-08-12 16:57 ` Axel Lin
2013-08-12 17:00 ` Michael Trimarchi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51C3F5EA.2050506@amarulasolutions.com \
--to=michael@amarulasolutions.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.