All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>,
	Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>,
	linux-mips <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>,
	Aurelien Jacquiot <a-jacquiot@ti.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Jonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se>,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
	"arm@kernel.org" <arm@kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
	Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
	linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org,
	James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>,
	devicetree-discuss <devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>,
	Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
	"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: Specify initrd location using 64-bit
Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2013 10:09:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51D1393E.6060001@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdV6YM3-hASqjxkguEukZjnjK80gBjDNiabxjfQtC=c8ag@mail.gmail.com>

On 07/01/2013 09:59 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> That's actual the original reason: DT has it as 64 bit, and passes it to a
> 32 bit kernel when running in 32 bit mode without PAE.

And I think the DT code should check if the u64 fits in phys_addr_t and
if does not it should write an error message and act like no initrd was
specified (instead of passing "something" to the architecture).

> 
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
> 
>                         Geert
> 

Sebastian

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>,
	linux-mips <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>,
	Aurelien Jacquiot <a-jacquiot@ti.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Jonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se>,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
	"arm@kernel.org" <arm@kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
	Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
	linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org,
	James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>,
	devicetree-discuss <devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>,
	Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
	Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>,
	"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: Specify initrd location using 64-bit
Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2013 10:09:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51D1393E.6060001@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdV6YM3-hASqjxkguEukZjnjK80gBjDNiabxjfQtC=c8ag@mail.gmail.com>

On 07/01/2013 09:59 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> That's actual the original reason: DT has it as 64 bit, and passes it to a
> 32 bit kernel when running in 32 bit mode without PAE.

And I think the DT code should check if the u64 fits in phys_addr_t and
if does not it should write an error message and act like no initrd was
specified (instead of passing "something" to the architecture).

> 
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
> 
>                         Geert
> 

Sebastian

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: bigeasy@linutronix.de (Sebastian Andrzej Siewior)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] of: Specify initrd location using 64-bit
Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2013 10:09:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51D1393E.6060001@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdV6YM3-hASqjxkguEukZjnjK80gBjDNiabxjfQtC=c8ag@mail.gmail.com>

On 07/01/2013 09:59 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> That's actual the original reason: DT has it as 64 bit, and passes it to a
> 32 bit kernel when running in 32 bit mode without PAE.

And I think the DT code should check if the u64 fits in phys_addr_t and
if does not it should write an error message and act like no initrd was
specified (instead of passing "something" to the architecture).

> 
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
> 
>                         Geert
> 

Sebastian

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>,
	Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>,
	linux-mips <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>,
	Aurelien Jacquiot <a-jacquiot@ti.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Jonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se>,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
	"arm@kernel.org" <arm@kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
	Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
	linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org,
	James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>,
	devicetree-discuss <devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.or>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: Specify initrd location using 64-bit
Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2013 10:09:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51D1393E.6060001@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdV6YM3-hASqjxkguEukZjnjK80gBjDNiabxjfQtC=c8ag@mail.gmail.com>

On 07/01/2013 09:59 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> That's actual the original reason: DT has it as 64 bit, and passes it to a
> 32 bit kernel when running in 32 bit mode without PAE.

And I think the DT code should check if the u64 fits in phys_addr_t and
if does not it should write an error message and act like no initrd was
specified (instead of passing "something" to the architecture).

> 
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
> 
>                         Geert
> 

Sebastian

  reply	other threads:[~2013-07-01  8:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 110+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-21  0:52 [PATCH] of: Specify initrd location using 64-bit Santosh Shilimkar
2013-06-21  0:52 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-06-21  0:52 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-06-21  0:52 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-06-21  0:52 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-06-21  4:39 ` Vineet Gupta
2013-06-21  4:39   ` Vineet Gupta
2013-06-21  4:39   ` Vineet Gupta
2013-06-21  4:39   ` Vineet Gupta
2013-06-21  4:39   ` Vineet Gupta
2013-06-21  8:23   ` James Hogan
2013-06-21  8:23     ` James Hogan
2013-06-21  8:23     ` James Hogan
2013-06-21  8:23     ` James Hogan
2013-06-21  8:23     ` James Hogan
2013-06-21 17:12     ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-06-21 17:12       ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-06-21 17:12       ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-06-21 17:12       ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-06-21 17:12       ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-06-21  9:04 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-06-21  9:04   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-06-21  9:04   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-06-21  9:04   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-06-21 17:20   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-06-21 17:20     ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-06-21 17:20     ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-06-21 17:20     ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-06-21 17:20     ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-06-27 20:54     ` Rob Herring
2013-06-27 20:54       ` Rob Herring
2013-06-27 20:54       ` Rob Herring
2013-06-27 20:54       ` Rob Herring
2013-06-28  7:54       ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-06-28  7:54         ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-06-28  7:54         ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-06-28  7:54         ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-06-28  9:59       ` Grant Likely
2013-06-28  9:59         ` Grant Likely
2013-06-28  9:59         ` Grant Likely
2013-06-28  9:59         ` Grant Likely
2013-06-28 13:49         ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2013-06-28 13:49           ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2013-06-28 13:49           ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2013-06-28 13:49           ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2013-06-28 23:43           ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-06-28 23:43             ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-06-28 23:43             ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-06-28 23:43             ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-06-28 23:43             ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-06-29  8:34             ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-06-29  8:34               ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-06-29  8:34               ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-06-29  8:34               ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-07-01  7:48             ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-07-01  7:48               ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-07-01  7:48               ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-07-01  7:48               ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-07-01  7:59               ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-07-01  7:59                 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-07-01  7:59                 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-07-01  7:59                 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-07-01  8:09                 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2013-07-01  8:09                   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-07-01  8:09                   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-07-01  8:09                   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-07-01 13:58                 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-07-01 13:58                   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-07-01 13:58                   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-07-01 13:58                   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-07-01 13:58                   ` Santosh Shilimkar
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-09-12 16:05 [PATCH] of: specify " Cyril Chemparathy
2012-09-12 16:05 ` Cyril Chemparathy
2012-09-12 16:05 ` Cyril Chemparathy
2012-09-12 16:05 ` Cyril Chemparathy
2012-09-12 16:16 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2012-09-12 16:16   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2012-09-12 16:16   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2012-09-12 18:02   ` Cyril Chemparathy
2012-09-12 18:02     ` Cyril Chemparathy
2012-09-12 18:02     ` Cyril Chemparathy
2012-09-12 18:02     ` Cyril Chemparathy
2012-09-12 18:02     ` Cyril Chemparathy
2012-09-12 19:58     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-09-12 19:58       ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-09-12 19:58       ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-09-12 22:08       ` Rob Herring
2012-09-12 22:08         ` Rob Herring
2012-09-12 22:08         ` Rob Herring
2012-09-13  6:47         ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-09-13  6:47           ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-09-13  6:47           ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-09-13 21:02           ` Rob Herring
2012-09-13 21:02             ` Rob Herring
2012-09-13 21:02             ` Rob Herring
2012-09-12 20:23 ` Rob Herring
2012-09-12 20:23   ` Rob Herring
2012-09-12 20:23   ` Rob Herring
2012-09-12 20:31   ` Nicolas Pitre
2012-09-12 20:31     ` Nicolas Pitre
2012-09-12 20:31     ` Nicolas Pitre
2012-09-12 20:56     ` Rob Herring
2012-09-12 20:56       ` Rob Herring
2012-09-12 20:56       ` Rob Herring
2012-09-12 20:56       ` Rob Herring
2012-09-12 23:45   ` Cyril Chemparathy
2012-09-12 23:45     ` Cyril Chemparathy
2012-09-12 23:45     ` Cyril Chemparathy
2012-09-12 23:45     ` Cyril Chemparathy
2012-09-12 23:45     ` Cyril Chemparathy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51D1393E.6060001@linutronix.de \
    --to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=a-jacquiot@ti.com \
    --cc=arm@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=chris@zankel.net \
    --cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
    --cc=james.hogan@imgtec.com \
    --cc=jcmvbkbc@gmail.com \
    --cc=jonas@southpole.se \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
    --cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
    --cc=robherring2@gmail.com \
    --cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
    --cc=vgupta@synopsys.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.