From: swarren@wwwdotorg.org (Stephen Warren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Appended DTB files for multi-machine kernels
Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2013 12:36:11 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51D7121B.50704@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51D5A938.30607@gmail.com>
On 07/04/2013 10:56 AM, Daniel Mack wrote:
...
> The built-in support for attaching a DTB to the zImage does not suffice
> here, because we have one image for all models, and also, we couldn't do
> a 'per-board-revision' selection that way either.
...
> As a solution, I'm thinking of a small framework that could for example
> work as follows.
>
> a) A small mechanism allows storing multiple DTB binary files inside the
> kernel binary at compile time...
...
> c) Allow users to open-code the DTB lookup depending on whatever kind of
> runtime information (be it the board_revision or anything else).
The problem with (c) is that in general it probably requires a lot of
infra-structure to be working to implement it. On Tegra, the board
revision is in an EEPROM attached to an I2C bus. You'd need to have
parsed DT and started instantiating devices already before you could
access the ID EEPROM to know which board revision you're running on.
That's a bit of a chicked-and-egg problem. Even with a much simpler
scheme such as board ID encoded into GPIOs, you'll still likely run into
similar problems; pinmux and GPIO controller drivers are needed just to
read the GPIOs, which then requires DT to instantiate those drivers.
So, the suggestion of Nicolas's that you mentioned does solve that
rather neatly.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stephen Warren <swarren-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>
To: Daniel Mack <zonque-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: stigge-uj/7R2tJ6VmzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org,
Stephen Warren <swarren-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
"devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org"
<devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org>,
Sven Neumann <s.neumann-5g8ninUHluJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org"
<linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: Appended DTB files for multi-machine kernels
Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2013 12:36:11 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51D7121B.50704@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51D5A938.30607-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
On 07/04/2013 10:56 AM, Daniel Mack wrote:
...
> The built-in support for attaching a DTB to the zImage does not suffice
> here, because we have one image for all models, and also, we couldn't do
> a 'per-board-revision' selection that way either.
...
> As a solution, I'm thinking of a small framework that could for example
> work as follows.
>
> a) A small mechanism allows storing multiple DTB binary files inside the
> kernel binary at compile time...
...
> c) Allow users to open-code the DTB lookup depending on whatever kind of
> runtime information (be it the board_revision or anything else).
The problem with (c) is that in general it probably requires a lot of
infra-structure to be working to implement it. On Tegra, the board
revision is in an EEPROM attached to an I2C bus. You'd need to have
parsed DT and started instantiating devices already before you could
access the ID EEPROM to know which board revision you're running on.
That's a bit of a chicked-and-egg problem. Even with a much simpler
scheme such as board ID encoded into GPIOs, you'll still likely run into
similar problems; pinmux and GPIO controller drivers are needed just to
read the GPIOs, which then requires DT to instantiate those drivers.
So, the suggestion of Nicolas's that you mentioned does solve that
rather neatly.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-05 18:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-04 16:56 Appended DTB files for multi-machine kernels Daniel Mack
2013-07-04 16:56 ` Daniel Mack
2013-07-04 17:11 ` Mark Brown
2013-07-04 17:11 ` Mark Brown
2013-07-04 21:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-07-04 21:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-07-04 23:02 ` Daniel Mack
2013-07-04 23:02 ` Daniel Mack
2013-07-05 8:32 ` Magnus Damm
2013-07-05 8:32 ` Magnus Damm
2013-07-04 17:28 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-07-04 17:28 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-07-04 17:57 ` Daniel Mack
2013-07-04 17:57 ` Daniel Mack
2013-07-04 18:27 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-07-04 18:27 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-07-26 16:13 ` Daniel Mack
2013-07-26 16:13 ` Daniel Mack
2013-07-26 16:44 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-07-26 16:44 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-07-29 21:23 ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] impedance-matcher generic improvements Jason Cooper
2013-07-29 21:23 ` Jason Cooper
2013-07-29 21:24 ` [PATCH 1/2] add cscope Makefile target Jason Cooper
2013-07-29 21:24 ` Jason Cooper
2013-07-29 21:24 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] WIP: Get kernel and dtb addresses from command line Jason Cooper
2013-07-29 21:24 ` Jason Cooper
2013-07-30 7:48 ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] impedance-matcher generic improvements Daniel Mack
2013-07-30 7:48 ` Daniel Mack
2013-07-30 13:17 ` Jason Cooper
2013-07-30 13:17 ` Jason Cooper
2013-07-30 13:37 ` Daniel Mack
2013-07-30 13:37 ` Daniel Mack
2013-07-30 14:42 ` Jason Cooper
2013-07-30 14:42 ` Jason Cooper
2013-08-02 15:51 ` [RFC PATCH V2 0/9] " Jason Cooper
2013-08-02 15:51 ` [RFC PATCH V2 1/9] add cscope Makefile target Jason Cooper
2013-08-02 15:51 ` [RFC PATCH V2 2/9] separate common functions from board specific Jason Cooper
2013-08-02 15:51 ` [RFC PATCH V2 3/9] rename board.c to board-raumfeld.c Jason Cooper
2013-08-02 15:51 ` [RFC PATCH V2 4/9] s/.name/.compatible/ Jason Cooper
2013-08-02 21:52 ` Stephen Warren
2013-08-03 14:07 ` Jason Cooper
2013-08-03 14:16 ` Daniel Mack
2013-08-02 15:51 ` [RFC PATCH V2 5/9] directly include needed headers Jason Cooper
2013-08-02 15:51 ` [RFC PATCH V2 6/9] serial: split out 8250 code, configurable reg addr Jason Cooper
2013-08-02 15:51 ` [RFC PATCH V2 7/9] add generic board code Jason Cooper
2013-08-02 15:51 ` [RFC PATCH V2 8/9] make appending images/dtbs optional Jason Cooper
2013-08-02 15:51 ` [RFC PATCH V2 9/9] appended dtbs works! Jason Cooper
2013-08-02 19:42 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-08-02 19:54 ` Jason Cooper
2013-08-02 19:57 ` Jason Cooper
2013-08-02 17:53 ` [RFC PATCH V2 0/9] impedance-matcher generic improvements Daniel Mack
2013-08-02 18:43 ` Jason Cooper
2013-08-02 18:46 ` Daniel Mack
2013-07-04 18:36 ` Appended DTB files for multi-machine kernels Dirk Behme
2013-07-04 18:36 ` Dirk Behme
2013-07-05 18:36 ` Stephen Warren [this message]
2013-07-05 18:36 ` Stephen Warren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51D7121B.50704@wwwdotorg.org \
--to=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.