From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
To: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Cc: Oleksandr Kozaruk <oleksandr.kozaruk@ti.com>,
tony@atomide.com, benoit.cousson@linaro.org, rnayak@ti.com,
peter.ujfalusi@ti.com, kishon@ti.com, jic23@cam.ac.uk,
grant.likely@linaro.org, rob.herring@calxeda.com,
lars@metafoo.de, sameo@linux.intel.com, ch.naveen@samsung.com,
poeschel@lemonage.de, milo.kim@ti.com, balajitk@ti.com,
gg@slimlogic.co.uk, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] ARM: dts: twl: Add GPADC data to device tree
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 22:18:56 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51E98310.7020103@cogentembedded.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51E95DEB.7010702@ti.com>
Hello.
On 07/19/2013 07:40 PM, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>>> GPADC is the general purpose ADC present on twl6030.
>>> The dt data is interrupt used to trigger end of ADC
>>> conversion.
>>> Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Kozaruk <oleksandr.kozaruk@ti.com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/twl6030.dtsi | 6 ++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/twl6030.dtsi
>>> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/twl6030.dtsi
>>> index 2e3bd31..d7d4c28 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/twl6030.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/twl6030.dtsi
>>> @@ -103,4 +103,10 @@
>>> compatible = "ti,twl6030-pwmled";
>>> #pwm-cells = <2>;
>>> };
>>> +
>>> + adc: gpadc {
>> Read my lips: the node should be called just "adc", not "gpadc".
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^ Are you sure?
I didn't know how to express my disappointment from Oleksandr's inability
to understand what I wanted to convey to him from 2 attempts... first, he
changed the label instead of the node name, then he only dropped "twl6030_"
prefix from the name. I should probably have been even more specific before.
> Why? The name was selected according to the documentation on device "General
> purpose analog-to-digital converter (GPADC)".
Sigh, we simply don't care whether this ADC is general-purpose or not.
The main thing it is ADC.
> PS. Following your logic - "GPIO" need to renamed to "IO" everywhere ;P
GPIO is well known and established abbreviation, contrasted to GPADC.
Moreover, ePAPR spec lists "gpio" as a generic node name.
WBR, Sergei
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov-M4DtvfQ/ZS1MRgGoP+s0PdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
To: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Oleksandr Kozaruk
<oleksandr.kozaruk-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>,
tony-4v6yS6AI5VpBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org,
benoit.cousson-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
rnayak-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org,
peter.ujfalusi-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org,
kishon-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org,
jic23-KWPb1pKIrIJaa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org,
grant.likely-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
rob.herring-bsGFqQB8/DxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org,
lars-Qo5EllUWu/uELgA04lAiVw@public.gmane.org,
sameo-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org,
ch.naveen-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org,
poeschel-Xtl8qvBWbHwb1SvskN2V4Q@public.gmane.org,
milo.kim-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org,
balajitk-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org,
gg-kDsPt+C1G03kYMGBc/C6ZA@public.gmane.org,
linux-iio-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org,
linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] ARM: dts: twl: Add GPADC data to device tree
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 22:18:56 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51E98310.7020103@cogentembedded.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51E95DEB.7010702-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
Hello.
On 07/19/2013 07:40 PM, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>>> GPADC is the general purpose ADC present on twl6030.
>>> The dt data is interrupt used to trigger end of ADC
>>> conversion.
>>> Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Kozaruk <oleksandr.kozaruk-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/twl6030.dtsi | 6 ++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/twl6030.dtsi
>>> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/twl6030.dtsi
>>> index 2e3bd31..d7d4c28 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/twl6030.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/twl6030.dtsi
>>> @@ -103,4 +103,10 @@
>>> compatible = "ti,twl6030-pwmled";
>>> #pwm-cells = <2>;
>>> };
>>> +
>>> + adc: gpadc {
>> Read my lips: the node should be called just "adc", not "gpadc".
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^ Are you sure?
I didn't know how to express my disappointment from Oleksandr's inability
to understand what I wanted to convey to him from 2 attempts... first, he
changed the label instead of the node name, then he only dropped "twl6030_"
prefix from the name. I should probably have been even more specific before.
> Why? The name was selected according to the documentation on device "General
> purpose analog-to-digital converter (GPADC)".
Sigh, we simply don't care whether this ADC is general-purpose or not.
The main thing it is ADC.
> PS. Following your logic - "GPIO" need to renamed to "IO" everywhere ;P
GPIO is well known and established abbreviation, contrasted to GPADC.
Moreover, ePAPR spec lists "gpio" as a generic node name.
WBR, Sergei
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com (Sergei Shtylyov)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v6 1/2] ARM: dts: twl: Add GPADC data to device tree
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 22:18:56 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51E98310.7020103@cogentembedded.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51E95DEB.7010702@ti.com>
Hello.
On 07/19/2013 07:40 PM, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>>> GPADC is the general purpose ADC present on twl6030.
>>> The dt data is interrupt used to trigger end of ADC
>>> conversion.
>>> Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Kozaruk <oleksandr.kozaruk@ti.com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/twl6030.dtsi | 6 ++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/twl6030.dtsi
>>> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/twl6030.dtsi
>>> index 2e3bd31..d7d4c28 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/twl6030.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/twl6030.dtsi
>>> @@ -103,4 +103,10 @@
>>> compatible = "ti,twl6030-pwmled";
>>> #pwm-cells = <2>;
>>> };
>>> +
>>> + adc: gpadc {
>> Read my lips: the node should be called just "adc", not "gpadc".
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^ Are you sure?
I didn't know how to express my disappointment from Oleksandr's inability
to understand what I wanted to convey to him from 2 attempts... first, he
changed the label instead of the node name, then he only dropped "twl6030_"
prefix from the name. I should probably have been even more specific before.
> Why? The name was selected according to the documentation on device "General
> purpose analog-to-digital converter (GPADC)".
Sigh, we simply don't care whether this ADC is general-purpose or not.
The main thing it is ADC.
> PS. Following your logic - "GPIO" need to renamed to "IO" everywhere ;P
GPIO is well known and established abbreviation, contrasted to GPADC.
Moreover, ePAPR spec lists "gpio" as a generic node name.
WBR, Sergei
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-19 18:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-19 9:27 [PATCH v6 0/2] TWL6030, TWL6032 GPADC driver Oleksandr Kozaruk
2013-07-19 9:27 ` Oleksandr Kozaruk
2013-07-19 9:27 ` Oleksandr Kozaruk
2013-07-19 9:27 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] ARM: dts: twl: Add GPADC data to device tree Oleksandr Kozaruk
2013-07-19 9:27 ` Oleksandr Kozaruk
2013-07-19 9:27 ` Oleksandr Kozaruk
2013-07-19 14:39 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-07-19 14:39 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-07-19 15:40 ` Grygorii Strashko
2013-07-19 15:40 ` Grygorii Strashko
2013-07-19 15:40 ` Grygorii Strashko
2013-07-19 18:18 ` Sergei Shtylyov [this message]
2013-07-19 18:18 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-07-19 18:18 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-07-20 6:14 ` Oleksandr Kozaruk
2013-07-20 6:14 ` Oleksandr Kozaruk
2013-07-19 9:27 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] iio: twl6030-gpadc: TWL6030, TWL6032 GPADC driver Oleksandr Kozaruk
2013-07-19 9:27 ` Oleksandr Kozaruk
2013-07-19 9:27 ` Oleksandr Kozaruk
2013-07-20 10:43 ` Jonathan Cameron
2013-07-20 10:43 ` Jonathan Cameron
2013-07-20 10:43 ` Jonathan Cameron
2013-07-22 9:12 ` Oleksandr Kozaruk
2013-07-22 9:12 ` Oleksandr Kozaruk
2013-07-22 9:12 ` Oleksandr Kozaruk
2013-07-25 6:08 ` Oleksandr Kozaruk
2013-07-25 6:08 ` Oleksandr Kozaruk
2013-07-25 6:08 ` Oleksandr Kozaruk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51E98310.7020103@cogentembedded.com \
--to=sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com \
--cc=balajitk@ti.com \
--cc=benoit.cousson@linaro.org \
--cc=ch.naveen@samsung.com \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=gg@slimlogic.co.uk \
--cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
--cc=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
--cc=jic23@cam.ac.uk \
--cc=kishon@ti.com \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=milo.kim@ti.com \
--cc=oleksandr.kozaruk@ti.com \
--cc=peter.ujfalusi@ti.com \
--cc=poeschel@lemonage.de \
--cc=rnayak@ti.com \
--cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
--cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.