From: Wei Ni <wni-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work-JGs/UdohzUI@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org"
<khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org"
<linux-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>,
"swarren-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org"
<swarren-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
"lm-sensors-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org"
<lm-sensors-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org>,
Matthew Longnecker
<MLongnecker-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org"
<linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] hwmon: (lm90) Add power control
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 17:26:14 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52036436.4090608@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1375946022.222322391-uDhCb/4LxRRsdVUOrk1QfQ@public.gmane.org>
On 08/08/2013 03:13 PM, Alexander Shiyan wrote:
>> The device lm90 can be controlled by the vdd rail.
>> Adding the power control support to power on/off the vdd rail.
>> And make sure that power is enabled before accessing the device.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wei Ni <wni-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/hwmon/lm90.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c b/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c
> [...]
>> +static void lm90_power_control(struct i2c_client *client, bool is_enable)
>> +{
>> + struct lm90_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + if (!data->lm90_reg)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + mutex_lock(&data->update_lock);
>> +
>> + if (is_enable)
>> + ret = regulator_enable(data->lm90_reg);
>> + else
>> + ret = regulator_disable(data->lm90_reg);
>> +
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + dev_err(&client->dev,
>> + "Error in %s rail vdd, error %d\n",
>> + (is_enable) ? "enabling" : "disabling", ret);
>> + else
>> + dev_info(&client->dev, "success in %s rail vdd\n",
>> + (is_enable) ? "enabling" : "disabling");
>
> dev_dbg() ?
As Guenter said, I will remove these messages, and remove this function,
the code will be more clean.
>
>> +
>> + mutex_unlock(&data->update_lock);
>> +}
>> +
>> static int lm90_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>> const struct i2c_device_id *id)
>> {
>> @@ -1406,6 +1434,20 @@ static int lm90_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>> i2c_set_clientdata(client, data);
>> mutex_init(&data->update_lock);
>>
>> + data->lm90_reg = regulator_get(&client->dev, "vdd");
>> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(data->lm90_reg)) {
>
> What about deferred probe?
> if (PTR_ERR(data->lm90_reg) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> return -EPROBE_DEFER;
Oh, yes, I should add it.
>
>> + if (PTR_ERR(data->lm90_reg) == -ENODEV)
>> + dev_info(&client->dev,
>> + "No regulator found for vdd. Assuming vdd is always powered.");
>
> On my opinion it is unnecessary message.
>
>> + else
>> + dev_warn(&client->dev,
>> + "Error [%ld] in getting the regulator handle for vdd.\n",
>> + PTR_ERR(data->lm90_reg));
>
> Ditto.
I will remove these log messages.
>
>> + data->lm90_reg = NULL;
>
> You can just use !IS_ERR(data->lm90_reg) macro in the future,
> rather than set this to NULL.
Yes, it's better, I will do it.
>
> [...]
>
> ---
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wei Ni <wni@nvidia.com>
To: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work-JGs/UdohzUI@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org"
<khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org"
<linux-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>,
"swarren-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org"
<swarren-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
"lm-sensors-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org"
<lm-sensors-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org>,
Matthew Longnecker
<MLongnecker-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org"
<linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH v2 1/3] hwmon: (lm90) Add power control
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2013 09:26:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52036436.4090608@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1375946022.222322391-uDhCb/4LxRRsdVUOrk1QfQ@public.gmane.org>
On 08/08/2013 03:13 PM, Alexander Shiyan wrote:
>> The device lm90 can be controlled by the vdd rail.
>> Adding the power control support to power on/off the vdd rail.
>> And make sure that power is enabled before accessing the device.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wei Ni <wni@nvidia.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/hwmon/lm90.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c b/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c
> [...]
>> +static void lm90_power_control(struct i2c_client *client, bool is_enable)
>> +{
>> + struct lm90_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + if (!data->lm90_reg)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + mutex_lock(&data->update_lock);
>> +
>> + if (is_enable)
>> + ret = regulator_enable(data->lm90_reg);
>> + else
>> + ret = regulator_disable(data->lm90_reg);
>> +
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + dev_err(&client->dev,
>> + "Error in %s rail vdd, error %d\n",
>> + (is_enable) ? "enabling" : "disabling", ret);
>> + else
>> + dev_info(&client->dev, "success in %s rail vdd\n",
>> + (is_enable) ? "enabling" : "disabling");
>
> dev_dbg() ?
As Guenter said, I will remove these messages, and remove this function,
the code will be more clean.
>
>> +
>> + mutex_unlock(&data->update_lock);
>> +}
>> +
>> static int lm90_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>> const struct i2c_device_id *id)
>> {
>> @@ -1406,6 +1434,20 @@ static int lm90_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>> i2c_set_clientdata(client, data);
>> mutex_init(&data->update_lock);
>>
>> + data->lm90_reg = regulator_get(&client->dev, "vdd");
>> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(data->lm90_reg)) {
>
> What about deferred probe?
> if (PTR_ERR(data->lm90_reg) = -EPROBE_DEFER)
> return -EPROBE_DEFER;
Oh, yes, I should add it.
>
>> + if (PTR_ERR(data->lm90_reg) = -ENODEV)
>> + dev_info(&client->dev,
>> + "No regulator found for vdd. Assuming vdd is always powered.");
>
> On my opinion it is unnecessary message.
>
>> + else
>> + dev_warn(&client->dev,
>> + "Error [%ld] in getting the regulator handle for vdd.\n",
>> + PTR_ERR(data->lm90_reg));
>
> Ditto.
I will remove these log messages.
>
>> + data->lm90_reg = NULL;
>
> You can just use !IS_ERR(data->lm90_reg) macro in the future,
> rather than set this to NULL.
Yes, it's better, I will do it.
>
> [...]
>
> ---
>
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: wni@nvidia.com (Wei Ni)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] hwmon: (lm90) Add power control
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 17:26:14 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52036436.4090608@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1375946022.222322391@f304.i.mail.ru>
On 08/08/2013 03:13 PM, Alexander Shiyan wrote:
>> The device lm90 can be controlled by the vdd rail.
>> Adding the power control support to power on/off the vdd rail.
>> And make sure that power is enabled before accessing the device.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wei Ni <wni@nvidia.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/hwmon/lm90.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c b/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c
> [...]
>> +static void lm90_power_control(struct i2c_client *client, bool is_enable)
>> +{
>> + struct lm90_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + if (!data->lm90_reg)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + mutex_lock(&data->update_lock);
>> +
>> + if (is_enable)
>> + ret = regulator_enable(data->lm90_reg);
>> + else
>> + ret = regulator_disable(data->lm90_reg);
>> +
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + dev_err(&client->dev,
>> + "Error in %s rail vdd, error %d\n",
>> + (is_enable) ? "enabling" : "disabling", ret);
>> + else
>> + dev_info(&client->dev, "success in %s rail vdd\n",
>> + (is_enable) ? "enabling" : "disabling");
>
> dev_dbg() ?
As Guenter said, I will remove these messages, and remove this function,
the code will be more clean.
>
>> +
>> + mutex_unlock(&data->update_lock);
>> +}
>> +
>> static int lm90_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>> const struct i2c_device_id *id)
>> {
>> @@ -1406,6 +1434,20 @@ static int lm90_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>> i2c_set_clientdata(client, data);
>> mutex_init(&data->update_lock);
>>
>> + data->lm90_reg = regulator_get(&client->dev, "vdd");
>> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(data->lm90_reg)) {
>
> What about deferred probe?
> if (PTR_ERR(data->lm90_reg) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> return -EPROBE_DEFER;
Oh, yes, I should add it.
>
>> + if (PTR_ERR(data->lm90_reg) == -ENODEV)
>> + dev_info(&client->dev,
>> + "No regulator found for vdd. Assuming vdd is always powered.");
>
> On my opinion it is unnecessary message.
>
>> + else
>> + dev_warn(&client->dev,
>> + "Error [%ld] in getting the regulator handle for vdd.\n",
>> + PTR_ERR(data->lm90_reg));
>
> Ditto.
I will remove these log messages.
>
>> + data->lm90_reg = NULL;
>
> You can just use !IS_ERR(data->lm90_reg) macro in the future,
> rather than set this to NULL.
Yes, it's better, I will do it.
>
> [...]
>
> ---
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wei Ni <wni@nvidia.com>
To: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru>
Cc: "khali@linux-fr.org" <khali@linux-fr.org>,
"linux@roeck-us.net" <linux@roeck-us.net>,
"swarren@wwwdotorg.org" <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org" <lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org>,
Matthew Longnecker <MLongnecker@nvidia.com>,
"linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] hwmon: (lm90) Add power control
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 17:26:14 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52036436.4090608@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1375946022.222322391@f304.i.mail.ru>
On 08/08/2013 03:13 PM, Alexander Shiyan wrote:
>> The device lm90 can be controlled by the vdd rail.
>> Adding the power control support to power on/off the vdd rail.
>> And make sure that power is enabled before accessing the device.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wei Ni <wni@nvidia.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/hwmon/lm90.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c b/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c
> [...]
>> +static void lm90_power_control(struct i2c_client *client, bool is_enable)
>> +{
>> + struct lm90_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + if (!data->lm90_reg)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + mutex_lock(&data->update_lock);
>> +
>> + if (is_enable)
>> + ret = regulator_enable(data->lm90_reg);
>> + else
>> + ret = regulator_disable(data->lm90_reg);
>> +
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + dev_err(&client->dev,
>> + "Error in %s rail vdd, error %d\n",
>> + (is_enable) ? "enabling" : "disabling", ret);
>> + else
>> + dev_info(&client->dev, "success in %s rail vdd\n",
>> + (is_enable) ? "enabling" : "disabling");
>
> dev_dbg() ?
As Guenter said, I will remove these messages, and remove this function,
the code will be more clean.
>
>> +
>> + mutex_unlock(&data->update_lock);
>> +}
>> +
>> static int lm90_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>> const struct i2c_device_id *id)
>> {
>> @@ -1406,6 +1434,20 @@ static int lm90_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>> i2c_set_clientdata(client, data);
>> mutex_init(&data->update_lock);
>>
>> + data->lm90_reg = regulator_get(&client->dev, "vdd");
>> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(data->lm90_reg)) {
>
> What about deferred probe?
> if (PTR_ERR(data->lm90_reg) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> return -EPROBE_DEFER;
Oh, yes, I should add it.
>
>> + if (PTR_ERR(data->lm90_reg) == -ENODEV)
>> + dev_info(&client->dev,
>> + "No regulator found for vdd. Assuming vdd is always powered.");
>
> On my opinion it is unnecessary message.
>
>> + else
>> + dev_warn(&client->dev,
>> + "Error [%ld] in getting the regulator handle for vdd.\n",
>> + PTR_ERR(data->lm90_reg));
>
> Ditto.
I will remove these log messages.
>
>> + data->lm90_reg = NULL;
>
> You can just use !IS_ERR(data->lm90_reg) macro in the future,
> rather than set this to NULL.
Yes, it's better, I will do it.
>
> [...]
>
> ---
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-08 9:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 157+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-08 6:56 [PATCH v2 0/3] Add power control for lm90 Wei Ni
2013-08-08 6:56 ` Wei Ni
2013-08-08 6:56 ` Wei Ni
2013-08-08 6:56 ` [lm-sensors] " Wei Ni
2013-08-08 6:56 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] hwmon: (lm90) Add power control Wei Ni
2013-08-08 6:56 ` Wei Ni
2013-08-08 6:56 ` Wei Ni
2013-08-08 6:56 ` [lm-sensors] " Wei Ni
2013-08-08 7:13 ` Alexander Shiyan
2013-08-08 7:13 ` Alexander Shiyan
2013-08-08 7:13 ` Alexander Shiyan
2013-08-08 7:13 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH v2 1/3] hwmon: (lm90) Add Alexander Shiyan
[not found] ` <1375946022.222322391-uDhCb/4LxRRsdVUOrk1QfQ@public.gmane.org>
2013-08-08 9:26 ` Wei Ni [this message]
2013-08-08 9:26 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] hwmon: (lm90) Add power control Wei Ni
2013-08-08 9:26 ` Wei Ni
2013-08-08 9:26 ` [lm-sensors] " Wei Ni
[not found] ` <1375944991-29182-2-git-send-email-wni-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-08-08 8:42 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-08 8:42 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-08 8:42 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-08 8:42 ` [lm-sensors] " Guenter Roeck
[not found] ` <520359E9.1000600-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
2013-08-08 9:47 ` Wei Ni
2013-08-08 9:47 ` Wei Ni
2013-08-08 9:47 ` Wei Ni
2013-08-08 9:47 ` [lm-sensors] " Wei Ni
2013-08-08 9:57 ` Alexander Shiyan
2013-08-08 9:57 ` Alexander Shiyan
2013-08-08 9:57 ` Alexander Shiyan
2013-08-08 9:57 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH v2 1/3] hwmon: (lm90) Add Alexander Shiyan
[not found] ` <1375955834.368114617-VbvbiqT9YuJsdVUOrk1QfQ@public.gmane.org>
2013-08-08 9:59 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] hwmon: (lm90) Add power control Wei Ni
2013-08-08 9:59 ` Wei Ni
2013-08-08 9:59 ` Wei Ni
2013-08-08 9:59 ` [lm-sensors] " Wei Ni
2013-08-08 10:07 ` Wei Ni
2013-08-08 10:07 ` Wei Ni
2013-08-08 10:07 ` Wei Ni
2013-08-08 10:07 ` [lm-sensors] " Wei Ni
[not found] ` <52036920.4050808-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-08-08 11:23 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-08 11:23 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-08 11:23 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-08 11:23 ` [lm-sensors] " Guenter Roeck
[not found] ` <52037F9A.7070802-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
2013-08-08 17:33 ` Stephen Warren
2013-08-08 17:33 ` Stephen Warren
2013-08-08 17:33 ` Stephen Warren
2013-08-08 17:33 ` [lm-sensors] " Stephen Warren
[not found] ` <5203D659.4050907-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>
2013-08-08 17:59 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-08 17:59 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-08 17:59 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-08 17:59 ` [lm-sensors] " Guenter Roeck
[not found] ` <20130808175918.GA15013-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
2013-08-08 18:45 ` Stephen Warren
2013-08-08 18:45 ` Stephen Warren
2013-08-08 18:45 ` Stephen Warren
2013-08-08 18:45 ` [lm-sensors] " Stephen Warren
2013-08-08 17:30 ` Stephen Warren
2013-08-08 17:30 ` Stephen Warren
2013-08-08 17:30 ` Stephen Warren
2013-08-08 17:30 ` [lm-sensors] " Stephen Warren
[not found] ` <5203D5B6.3060806-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>
2013-08-08 17:59 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-08 17:59 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-08 17:59 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-08 17:59 ` [lm-sensors] " Guenter Roeck
2013-08-08 19:27 ` Mark Brown
2013-08-08 19:27 ` Mark Brown
2013-08-08 19:27 ` Mark Brown
2013-08-08 19:27 ` [lm-sensors] " Mark Brown
2013-08-08 11:01 ` Mark Brown
2013-08-08 11:01 ` Mark Brown
2013-08-08 11:01 ` Mark Brown
2013-08-08 11:01 ` [lm-sensors] " Mark Brown
[not found] ` <20130808110136.GA6427-GFdadSzt00ze9xe1eoZjHA@public.gmane.org>
2013-08-08 11:25 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-08 11:25 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-08 11:25 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-08 11:25 ` [lm-sensors] " Guenter Roeck
[not found] ` <52038035.7030803-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
2013-08-08 13:08 ` Mark Brown
2013-08-08 13:08 ` Mark Brown
2013-08-08 13:08 ` Mark Brown
2013-08-08 13:08 ` [lm-sensors] " Mark Brown
2013-08-08 15:21 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-08 15:21 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-08 15:21 ` [lm-sensors] " Guenter Roeck
[not found] ` <5203B78C.7010101-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
2013-08-08 17:15 ` Mark Brown
2013-08-08 17:15 ` Mark Brown
2013-08-08 17:15 ` Mark Brown
2013-08-08 17:15 ` [lm-sensors] " Mark Brown
[not found] ` <20130808171554.GI6427-GFdadSzt00ze9xe1eoZjHA@public.gmane.org>
2013-08-08 20:00 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-08 20:00 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-08 20:00 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-08 20:00 ` [lm-sensors] " Guenter Roeck
[not found] ` <20130808200026.GA18226-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
2013-08-08 21:18 ` Mark Brown
2013-08-08 21:18 ` Mark Brown
2013-08-08 21:18 ` Mark Brown
2013-08-08 21:18 ` [lm-sensors] " Mark Brown
[not found] ` <20130808211825.GN6427-GFdadSzt00ze9xe1eoZjHA@public.gmane.org>
2013-08-08 21:30 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-08 21:30 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-08 21:30 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-08 21:30 ` [lm-sensors] " Guenter Roeck
[not found] ` <52040DE2.50201-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
2013-08-09 5:57 ` Proposal: I2C device power (Was: hwmon: (lm90) Add power control) Alexander Shiyan
2013-08-09 5:57 ` Alexander Shiyan
2013-08-09 5:57 ` [lm-sensors] Proposal: I2C device power (Was: hwm =?utf-8?q?on=3A_=28lm90=29_Add_p Alexander Shiyan
2013-08-09 10:27 ` Proposal: I2C device power (Was: hwmon: (lm90) Add power control) Mark Brown
2013-08-09 10:27 ` Mark Brown
2013-08-09 10:27 ` [lm-sensors] " Mark Brown
2013-08-09 10:50 ` Alexander Shiyan
2013-08-09 10:50 ` Alexander Shiyan
2013-08-09 10:50 ` Alexander Shiyan
2013-08-09 10:50 ` [lm-sensors] Proposal: I2C device power (Was: hwm Alexander Shiyan
[not found] ` <1376045411.585130456-gOtJ1i61JehsdVUOrk1QfQ@public.gmane.org>
2013-08-09 11:09 ` Proposal: I2C device power (Was: hwmon: (lm90) Add power control) Mark Brown
2013-08-09 11:09 ` Mark Brown
2013-08-09 11:09 ` Mark Brown
2013-08-09 11:09 ` [lm-sensors] " Mark Brown
2013-08-09 7:23 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] hwmon: (lm90) Add power control Wei Ni
2013-08-09 7:23 ` Wei Ni
2013-08-09 7:23 ` Wei Ni
2013-08-09 7:23 ` [lm-sensors] " Wei Ni
[not found] ` <520498F3.8030101-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-08-09 10:56 ` Mark Brown
2013-08-09 10:56 ` Mark Brown
2013-08-09 10:56 ` Mark Brown
2013-08-09 10:56 ` [lm-sensors] " Mark Brown
2013-08-08 6:56 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] ARM: dt: t114 dalmore: add dt entry for nct1008 Wei Ni
2013-08-08 6:56 ` Wei Ni
2013-08-08 6:56 ` Wei Ni
2013-08-08 6:56 ` [lm-sensors] " Wei Ni
[not found] ` <1375944991-29182-3-git-send-email-wni-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-08-08 17:35 ` Stephen Warren
2013-08-08 17:35 ` Stephen Warren
2013-08-08 17:35 ` Stephen Warren
2013-08-08 17:35 ` [lm-sensors] " Stephen Warren
2013-08-09 6:06 ` Wei Ni
2013-08-09 6:06 ` Wei Ni
2013-08-09 6:06 ` Wei Ni
2013-08-09 6:06 ` [lm-sensors] " Wei Ni
2013-08-08 20:36 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-08-08 20:36 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-08-08 20:36 ` [lm-sensors] " Sergei Shtylyov
[not found] ` <52040146.7060703-M4DtvfQ/ZS1MRgGoP+s0PdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2013-08-08 20:40 ` Stephen Warren
2013-08-08 20:40 ` Stephen Warren
2013-08-08 20:40 ` Stephen Warren
2013-08-08 20:40 ` [lm-sensors] " Stephen Warren
2013-08-08 21:33 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-08 21:33 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-08 21:33 ` [lm-sensors] " Guenter Roeck
2013-08-09 6:16 ` Wei Ni
2013-08-09 6:16 ` Wei Ni
2013-08-09 6:16 ` [lm-sensors] " Wei Ni
2013-08-08 6:56 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] Documentation: dt: hwmon: add OF document for lm90 Wei Ni
2013-08-08 6:56 ` Wei Ni
2013-08-08 6:56 ` Wei Ni
2013-08-08 6:56 ` [lm-sensors] " Wei Ni
[not found] ` <1375944991-29182-4-git-send-email-wni-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-08-08 17:37 ` Stephen Warren
2013-08-08 17:37 ` Stephen Warren
2013-08-08 17:37 ` Stephen Warren
2013-08-08 17:37 ` [lm-sensors] " Stephen Warren
2013-08-09 6:10 ` Wei Ni
2013-08-09 6:10 ` Wei Ni
2013-08-09 6:10 ` [lm-sensors] " Wei Ni
[not found] ` <520487C7.5080901-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-08-09 16:35 ` Stephen Warren
2013-08-09 16:35 ` Stephen Warren
2013-08-09 16:35 ` Stephen Warren
2013-08-09 16:35 ` [lm-sensors] " Stephen Warren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52036436.4090608@nvidia.com \
--to=wni-ddmlm1+adcrqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=MLongnecker-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=lm-sensors-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=shc_work-JGs/UdohzUI@public.gmane.org \
--cc=swarren-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.