All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: sctp: sctp_set_owner_w: fix panic during skb orphaning
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2013 20:47:32 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52055564.50500@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130809.133720.232424253997869104.davem@davemloft.net>

On 08/09/2013 10:37 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
> Date: Wed,  7 Aug 2013 12:42:01 +0200
>
>> This patch fixes the following triggered bug ...
>   ...
>> ... that is triggered after commit 376c7311b ("net: add a temporary sanity
>> check in skb_orphan()"). What is happening is that we call sctp_set_owner_w()
>> for chunks in the SCTP output path from sctp_sendmsg(). Such chunks eventually
>> origin from constructors like sctp_make_chunk() where skb->sk = sk is being
>> set for socket accounting. Doing a git grep -n "skb->sk" net/sctp/ shows that
>> also in other places the socket pointer is being set, before issuing a
>> SCTP_CMD_SEND_PKT command and the like. Since SCTP is doing it's own memory
>> accounting anyway and has its own skb destructor functions, we should
>> customize sctp_set_owner_w() and call skb_orphan() if we set a different
>> owner of the skb than the current one in order to properly call their
>> destructor function, but not run into a panic due to our non-exisiting one as
>> we set sctp_wfree() destructor right after that. Otherwise, we can just skip
>> orphaning and reassignment to the very same socket and only set the destructor
>> handler.
>
> This debugging check is exactly trying to catch what SCTP is doing,
> setting skb->sk without also setting the destructor.
>
> I would much rather see you reorganize and fix SCTP to behave properly
> rather than coding up a check which is essentially "if skb_orphan() bug
> won't trigger, call it"  That defeats the whole purpose of the check.

Ok, will try to come up with a patch next week. Thanks.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: sctp: sctp_set_owner_w: fix panic during skb orphaning
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2013 22:47:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52055564.50500@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130809.133720.232424253997869104.davem@davemloft.net>

On 08/09/2013 10:37 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
> Date: Wed,  7 Aug 2013 12:42:01 +0200
>
>> This patch fixes the following triggered bug ...
>   ...
>> ... that is triggered after commit 376c7311b ("net: add a temporary sanity
>> check in skb_orphan()"). What is happening is that we call sctp_set_owner_w()
>> for chunks in the SCTP output path from sctp_sendmsg(). Such chunks eventually
>> origin from constructors like sctp_make_chunk() where skb->sk = sk is being
>> set for socket accounting. Doing a git grep -n "skb->sk" net/sctp/ shows that
>> also in other places the socket pointer is being set, before issuing a
>> SCTP_CMD_SEND_PKT command and the like. Since SCTP is doing it's own memory
>> accounting anyway and has its own skb destructor functions, we should
>> customize sctp_set_owner_w() and call skb_orphan() if we set a different
>> owner of the skb than the current one in order to properly call their
>> destructor function, but not run into a panic due to our non-exisiting one as
>> we set sctp_wfree() destructor right after that. Otherwise, we can just skip
>> orphaning and reassignment to the very same socket and only set the destructor
>> handler.
>
> This debugging check is exactly trying to catch what SCTP is doing,
> setting skb->sk without also setting the destructor.
>
> I would much rather see you reorganize and fix SCTP to behave properly
> rather than coding up a check which is essentially "if skb_orphan() bug
> won't trigger, call it"  That defeats the whole purpose of the check.

Ok, will try to come up with a patch next week. Thanks.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-08-09 20:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-07 10:42 [PATCH net-next] net: sctp: sctp_set_owner_w: fix panic during skb orphaning Daniel Borkmann
2013-08-07 10:42 ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-08-08  5:57 ` Neil Horman
2013-08-08  5:57   ` Neil Horman
2013-08-09 20:37 ` David Miller
2013-08-09 20:37   ` David Miller
2013-08-09 20:47   ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
2013-08-09 20:47     ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-08-09 21:58   ` [PATCH] net: sctp: fix panic during skb_orphan() Vlad Yasevich
2013-08-09 21:58     ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-08-09 23:20     ` Eric Dumazet
2013-08-09 23:20       ` Eric Dumazet
2013-08-10  0:39       ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-08-10  0:39         ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-08-10  1:20         ` Eric Dumazet
2013-08-10  1:20           ` Eric Dumazet
2013-08-10  1:34           ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-08-10  1:34             ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-08-10  2:05         ` [PATCH net-next] net: sctp: Add rudimentary infrastructure to account for control chunks Vlad Yasevich
2013-08-10  2:05           ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-08-13 22:04           ` David Miller
2013-08-13 22:04             ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52055564.50500@redhat.com \
    --to=dborkman@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.