From: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: [PATCH] slub: Fix calculation of cpu slabs
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 11:43:37 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <522E9569.9060104@huawei.com> (raw)
/sys/kernel/slab/:t-0000048 # cat cpu_slabs
231 N0=16 N1=215
/sys/kernel/slab/:t-0000048 # cat slabs
145 N0=36 N1=109
See, the number of slabs is smaller than that of cpu slabs.
The bug was introduced by commit 49e2258586b423684f03c278149ab46d8f8b6700
("slub: per cpu cache for partial pages").
We should use page->pages instead of page->pobjects when calculating
the number of cpu partial slabs. This also fixes the mapping of slabs
and nodes.
As there's no variable storing the number of total/active objects in
cpu partial slabs, and we don't have user interfaces requiring those
statistics, I just add WARN_ON for those cases.
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.2+
Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
---
mm/slub.c | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index e3ba1f2..6ea461d 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -4300,7 +4300,13 @@ static ssize_t show_slab_objects(struct kmem_cache *s,
page = ACCESS_ONCE(c->partial);
if (page) {
- x = page->pobjects;
+ node = page_to_nid(page);
+ if (flags & SO_TOTAL)
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
+ else if (flags & SO_OBJECTS)
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
+ else
+ x = page->pages;
total += x;
nodes[node] += x;
}
--
1.8.0.2
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: [PATCH] slub: Fix calculation of cpu slabs
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 11:43:37 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <522E9569.9060104@huawei.com> (raw)
/sys/kernel/slab/:t-0000048 # cat cpu_slabs
231 N0=16 N1=215
/sys/kernel/slab/:t-0000048 # cat slabs
145 N0=36 N1=109
See, the number of slabs is smaller than that of cpu slabs.
The bug was introduced by commit 49e2258586b423684f03c278149ab46d8f8b6700
("slub: per cpu cache for partial pages").
We should use page->pages instead of page->pobjects when calculating
the number of cpu partial slabs. This also fixes the mapping of slabs
and nodes.
As there's no variable storing the number of total/active objects in
cpu partial slabs, and we don't have user interfaces requiring those
statistics, I just add WARN_ON for those cases.
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.2+
Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
---
mm/slub.c | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index e3ba1f2..6ea461d 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -4300,7 +4300,13 @@ static ssize_t show_slab_objects(struct kmem_cache *s,
page = ACCESS_ONCE(c->partial);
if (page) {
- x = page->pobjects;
+ node = page_to_nid(page);
+ if (flags & SO_TOTAL)
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
+ else if (flags & SO_OBJECTS)
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
+ else
+ x = page->pages;
total += x;
nodes[node] += x;
}
--
1.8.0.2
next reply other threads:[~2013-09-10 3:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-10 3:43 Li Zefan [this message]
2013-09-10 3:43 ` [PATCH] slub: Fix calculation of cpu slabs Li Zefan
2013-09-10 21:06 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-09-10 21:06 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-10-14 7:27 ` Li Zefan
2013-10-14 7:27 ` Li Zefan
2013-10-05 7:48 ` Wanpeng Li
2013-12-29 11:45 ` Pekka Enberg
2013-12-29 11:45 ` Pekka Enberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=522E9569.9060104@huawei.com \
--to=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.