From: Vasant Hegde <hegdevasant@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@au1.ibm.com>,
Asai Thambi S P <asamymuthupa@micron.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Shivaprasad G Bhat <sbhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: powerpc allmodconfig build broken due to commit 15863ff3b (powerpc: Make chip-id information available to userspace)
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 12:06:09 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52300F59.3070605@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130910225029.GA26981@roeck-us.net>
On 09/11/2013 04:20 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 08:02:49AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>> On Mon, 2013-09-09 at 16:55 -0700, Asai Thambi S P wrote:
>>> On 09/08/2013 5:28 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
Guenter, Ben,
Sorry for the inconvenience. I never realized my patch could break somewhere :-(
Thanks you very much for identifying and fixing this issue. Other patch looks
good to me.
-Vasant
>>>> powerpc allmodconfig build on the latest upstream kernel results in:
>>>>
>>>> ERROR: ".cpu_to_chip_id" [drivers/block/mtip32xx/mtip32xx.ko] undefined!
>>>>
>>>> This is due to commit 15863ff3b (powerpc: Make chip-id information
>>>> available to userspace).
>>>> Not surprising, as cpu_to_chip_id() is not exported.
>>>>
>>> Apart from the above error, I have a concern on the patch, purely based on the commit message.
>>> (to be honest, I am not familiar with the ppc architecture)
>>>
>>> Commit message of 15863ff3b has the following text.
>>>
>>> ******************
>>> So far "/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/topology/physical_package_id"
>>> was always default (-1) on ppc64 architecture.
>>>
>>> Now, some systems have an ibm,chip-id property in the cpu nodes in
>>> the device tree. On these systems, we now use this information to
>>> display physical_package_id
>>> ******************
>>>
>>> Shouldn't the new definition of "topology_physical_package_id" apply only to those systems supporting ibm,chip-id property?
>>
>> There should be no negative side effect (appart from the missing
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL of course). If the property is not found in the
>> device-tree, the new function returns -1, so it should work fine on all
>> systems.
>>
> Good. I submitted a patch doing just that yesterday or so.
> Hope you'll accept it ;).
>
> Thanks,
> Guenter
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-11 6:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-09 0:28 powerpc allmodconfig build broken due to commit 15863ff3b (powerpc: Make chip-id information available to userspace) Guenter Roeck
2013-09-09 0:28 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-09-09 23:55 ` Asai Thambi S P
2013-09-09 23:55 ` Asai Thambi S P
2013-09-10 1:18 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-09-10 1:18 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-09-10 22:02 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-09-10 22:02 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-09-10 22:50 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-09-10 22:50 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-09-11 6:36 ` Vasant Hegde [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52300F59.3070605@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=hegdevasant@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=asamymuthupa@micron.com \
--cc=benh@au1.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=sbhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.