From: Asai Thambi S P <asamymuthupa@micron.com>
To: Vasant Hegde <hegdevasant@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Shivaprasad G Bhat <sbhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Subject: Re: powerpc allmodconfig build broken due to commit 15863ff3b (powerpc: Make chip-id information available to userspace)
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2013 16:55:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <522E5FD5.40603@micron.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <522D163E.80106@roeck-us.net>
On 09/08/2013 5:28 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> powerpc allmodconfig build on the latest upstream kernel results in:
>
> ERROR: ".cpu_to_chip_id" [drivers/block/mtip32xx/mtip32xx.ko] undefined!
>
> This is due to commit 15863ff3b (powerpc: Make chip-id information
> available to userspace).
> Not surprising, as cpu_to_chip_id() is not exported.
>
Apart from the above error, I have a concern on the patch, purely based on the commit message.
(to be honest, I am not familiar with the ppc architecture)
Commit message of 15863ff3b has the following text.
******************
So far "/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/topology/physical_package_id"
was always default (-1) on ppc64 architecture.
Now, some systems have an ibm,chip-id property in the cpu nodes in
the device tree. On these systems, we now use this information to
display physical_package_id
******************
Shouldn't the new definition of "topology_physical_package_id" apply only to those systems supporting ibm,chip-id property?
> Reverting this commit fixes the problem. Any good idea how to fix it
> for real ?
>
> Guenter
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Asai Thambi S P <asamymuthupa@micron.com>
To: Vasant Hegde <hegdevasant@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Shivaprasad G Bhat <sbhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
<linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Subject: Re: powerpc allmodconfig build broken due to commit 15863ff3b (powerpc: Make chip-id information available to userspace)
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2013 16:55:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <522E5FD5.40603@micron.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <522D163E.80106@roeck-us.net>
On 09/08/2013 5:28 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> powerpc allmodconfig build on the latest upstream kernel results in:
>
> ERROR: ".cpu_to_chip_id" [drivers/block/mtip32xx/mtip32xx.ko] undefined!
>
> This is due to commit 15863ff3b (powerpc: Make chip-id information
> available to userspace).
> Not surprising, as cpu_to_chip_id() is not exported.
>
Apart from the above error, I have a concern on the patch, purely based on the commit message.
(to be honest, I am not familiar with the ppc architecture)
Commit message of 15863ff3b has the following text.
******************
So far "/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/topology/physical_package_id"
was always default (-1) on ppc64 architecture.
Now, some systems have an ibm,chip-id property in the cpu nodes in
the device tree. On these systems, we now use this information to
display physical_package_id
******************
Shouldn't the new definition of "topology_physical_package_id" apply only to those systems supporting ibm,chip-id property?
> Reverting this commit fixes the problem. Any good idea how to fix it
> for real ?
>
> Guenter
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-10 0:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-09 0:28 powerpc allmodconfig build broken due to commit 15863ff3b (powerpc: Make chip-id information available to userspace) Guenter Roeck
2013-09-09 0:28 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-09-09 23:55 ` Asai Thambi S P [this message]
2013-09-09 23:55 ` Asai Thambi S P
2013-09-10 1:18 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-09-10 1:18 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-09-10 22:02 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-09-10 22:02 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-09-10 22:50 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-09-10 22:50 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-09-11 6:36 ` Vasant Hegde
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=522E5FD5.40603@micron.com \
--to=asamymuthupa@micron.com \
--cc=hegdevasant@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=sbhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.