All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com>
To: "Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kwilczynski@kernel.org>,
	"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <mani@kernel.org>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
	"Niklas Cassel" <cassel@kernel.org>,
	"Shawn Lin" <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>,
	"Hans Zhang" <18255117159@163.com>,
	"open list:PCI NATIVE HOST BRIDGE AND ENDPOINT DRIVERS"
	<linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	"moderated list:ARM/Rockchip SoC support"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC support"
	<linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>,
	"open list" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Anand Moon" <linux.amoon@gmail.com>
Cc: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] PCI: dw-rockchip: Add remove callback for resource cleanup
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2025 16:12:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5235617.GXAFRqVoOG@workhorse> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251027145602.199154-2-linux.amoon@gmail.com>

On Monday, 27 October 2025 15:55:29 Central European Standard Time Anand Moon wrote:
> Introduce a .remove() callback to the Rockchip DesignWare PCIe
> controller driver to ensure proper resource deinitialization during
> device removal. This includes disabling clocks and deinitializing the
> PCIe PHY.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c | 11 +++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
> index 87dd2dd188b4..b878ae8e2b3e 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
> @@ -717,6 +717,16 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static void rockchip_pcie_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> +	struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> +	/* Perform other cleanups as necessary */
> +	clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(rockchip->clk_cnt, rockchip->clks);
> +	rockchip_pcie_phy_deinit(rockchip);

You may want to add a

    if (rockchip->vpcie3v3)
            regulator_disable(rockchip->vpcie3v3);

here, since it's enabled in the probe function if it's found.

Not doing so means the regulator core will produce a warning
splat when devres removes it I'm fairly sure.

Kind regards,
Nicolas Frattaroli

> +}
> +
>  static const struct rockchip_pcie_of_data rockchip_pcie_rc_of_data_rk3568 = {
>  	.mode = DW_PCIE_RC_TYPE,
>  };
> @@ -754,5 +764,6 @@ static struct platform_driver rockchip_pcie_driver = {
>  		.suppress_bind_attrs = true,
>  	},
>  	.probe = rockchip_pcie_probe,
> +	.remove = rockchip_pcie_remove,
>  };
>  builtin_platform_driver(rockchip_pcie_driver);
> 






WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com>
To: "Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kwilczynski@kernel.org>,
	"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <mani@kernel.org>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
	"Niklas Cassel" <cassel@kernel.org>,
	"Shawn Lin" <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>,
	"Hans Zhang" <18255117159@163.com>,
	"open list:PCI NATIVE HOST BRIDGE AND ENDPOINT DRIVERS"
	<linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	"moderated list:ARM/Rockchip SoC support"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC support"
	<linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>,
	"open list" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Anand Moon" <linux.amoon@gmail.com>
Cc: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] PCI: dw-rockchip: Add remove callback for resource cleanup
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2025 16:12:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5235617.GXAFRqVoOG@workhorse> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251027145602.199154-2-linux.amoon@gmail.com>

On Monday, 27 October 2025 15:55:29 Central European Standard Time Anand Moon wrote:
> Introduce a .remove() callback to the Rockchip DesignWare PCIe
> controller driver to ensure proper resource deinitialization during
> device removal. This includes disabling clocks and deinitializing the
> PCIe PHY.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c | 11 +++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
> index 87dd2dd188b4..b878ae8e2b3e 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
> @@ -717,6 +717,16 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static void rockchip_pcie_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> +	struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> +	/* Perform other cleanups as necessary */
> +	clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(rockchip->clk_cnt, rockchip->clks);
> +	rockchip_pcie_phy_deinit(rockchip);

You may want to add a

    if (rockchip->vpcie3v3)
            regulator_disable(rockchip->vpcie3v3);

here, since it's enabled in the probe function if it's found.

Not doing so means the regulator core will produce a warning
splat when devres removes it I'm fairly sure.

Kind regards,
Nicolas Frattaroli

> +}
> +
>  static const struct rockchip_pcie_of_data rockchip_pcie_rc_of_data_rk3568 = {
>  	.mode = DW_PCIE_RC_TYPE,
>  };
> @@ -754,5 +764,6 @@ static struct platform_driver rockchip_pcie_driver = {
>  		.suppress_bind_attrs = true,
>  	},
>  	.probe = rockchip_pcie_probe,
> +	.remove = rockchip_pcie_remove,
>  };
>  builtin_platform_driver(rockchip_pcie_driver);
> 





_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-27 15:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-27 14:55 [PATCH v1 0/2] Add runtime PM support to Rockchip DW PCIe driver Anand Moon
2025-10-27 14:55 ` Anand Moon
2025-10-27 14:55 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] PCI: dw-rockchip: Add remove callback for resource cleanup Anand Moon
2025-10-27 14:55   ` Anand Moon
2025-10-27 15:12   ` Nicolas Frattaroli [this message]
2025-10-27 15:12     ` Nicolas Frattaroli
2025-10-27 16:31     ` Anand Moon
2025-10-27 16:31       ` Anand Moon
2025-10-27 17:17       ` Nicolas Frattaroli
2025-10-27 17:17         ` Nicolas Frattaroli
2025-10-28  0:26   ` Shawn Lin
2025-10-28  0:26     ` Shawn Lin
2025-10-28  9:34     ` Anand Moon
2025-10-28  9:34       ` Anand Moon
2025-10-29  0:28       ` Shawn Lin
2025-10-29  0:28         ` Shawn Lin
2025-10-29  6:24         ` Anand Moon
2025-10-29  6:24           ` Anand Moon
2025-10-31  8:36   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-10-31  8:36     ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-10-31 12:29     ` Nicolas Frattaroli
2025-10-31 12:29       ` Nicolas Frattaroli
2025-10-31 15:08       ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-10-31 15:08         ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-10-27 14:55 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] PCI: dw-rockchip: Add runtime PM support to Rockchip PCIe driver Anand Moon
2025-10-27 14:55   ` Anand Moon
2025-10-28  0:44   ` Shawn Lin
2025-10-28  0:44     ` Shawn Lin
2025-10-28  9:34     ` Anand Moon
2025-10-28  9:34       ` Anand Moon
2025-10-31  8:39   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-10-31  8:39     ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-10-31 14:03     ` Anand Moon
2025-10-31 14:03       ` Anand Moon
2025-10-31 14:53       ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-10-31 14:53         ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-11-01  8:09         ` Anand Moon
2025-11-01  8:09           ` Anand Moon
2025-10-27 15:06 ` [PATCH v1 0/2] Add runtime PM support to Rockchip DW " Nicolas Frattaroli
2025-10-27 15:06   ` Nicolas Frattaroli
2025-10-29  6:29   ` Anand Moon
2025-10-29  6:29     ` Anand Moon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5235617.GXAFRqVoOG@workhorse \
    --to=nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com \
    --cc=18255117159@163.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=cassel@kernel.org \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux.amoon@gmail.com \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=mani@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.