From: john.stultz@linaro.org (John Stultz)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC, PATCH] clocksource: provide timekeeping for efm32 SoCs
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 16:55:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <524377E3.4050806@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <524376A0.7020405@linaro.org>
On 09/25/2013 04:49 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 09/25/2013 05:32 PM, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
>> Hello Daniel,
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 04:33:24PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>> On 09/16/2013 11:44 AM, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig b/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig
>>>> index 41c6946..410b152 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig
>>>> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig
>>>> @@ -70,6 +70,14 @@ config CLKSRC_DBX500_PRCMU_SCHED_CLOCK
>>>> help
>>>> Use the always on PRCMU Timer as sched_clock
>>>>
>>>> +config CLKSRC_EFM32
>>>> + bool "Clocksource for Energy Micro's EFM32 SoCs" if !ARCH_EFM32
>>>> + depends on OF && ARM && (ARCH_EFM32 || COMPILE_TEST)
>>>> + default ARCH_EFM32
>>>> + help
>>>> + Support to use the timers of EFM32 SoCs as clock source and clock
>>>> + event device.
>>>> +
>>> No option for the timer. It must be selected by the platform.
>> It is. If ARCH_EFM32=y there is no prompt and the "default ARCH_EFM32"
>> makes it true.
> ok, with that but if ARCH_EFM32=no, you can enable it manually. AFAIK,
> we want to prevent this and let the correct arch to enable it.
>
> John ?
Right until there's really a compelling reason (which I've still not
heard), I don't want to introduce independent clocksource options. Any
such options should be something like a platform or board config option.
thanks
-john
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
To: "Daniel Lezcano" <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kernel@pengutronix.de
Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH] clocksource: provide timekeeping for efm32 SoCs
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 16:55:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <524377E3.4050806@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <524376A0.7020405@linaro.org>
On 09/25/2013 04:49 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 09/25/2013 05:32 PM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>> Hello Daniel,
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 04:33:24PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>> On 09/16/2013 11:44 AM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig b/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig
>>>> index 41c6946..410b152 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig
>>>> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig
>>>> @@ -70,6 +70,14 @@ config CLKSRC_DBX500_PRCMU_SCHED_CLOCK
>>>> help
>>>> Use the always on PRCMU Timer as sched_clock
>>>>
>>>> +config CLKSRC_EFM32
>>>> + bool "Clocksource for Energy Micro's EFM32 SoCs" if !ARCH_EFM32
>>>> + depends on OF && ARM && (ARCH_EFM32 || COMPILE_TEST)
>>>> + default ARCH_EFM32
>>>> + help
>>>> + Support to use the timers of EFM32 SoCs as clock source and clock
>>>> + event device.
>>>> +
>>> No option for the timer. It must be selected by the platform.
>> It is. If ARCH_EFM32=y there is no prompt and the "default ARCH_EFM32"
>> makes it true.
> ok, with that but if ARCH_EFM32=no, you can enable it manually. AFAIK,
> we want to prevent this and let the correct arch to enable it.
>
> John ?
Right until there's really a compelling reason (which I've still not
heard), I don't want to introduce independent clocksource options. Any
such options should be something like a platform or board config option.
thanks
-john
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-25 23:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-16 9:44 [RFC, PATCH] clocksource: provide timekeeping for efm32 SoCs Uwe Kleine-König
2013-09-16 9:44 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2013-09-25 14:33 ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-09-25 14:33 ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-09-25 15:32 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2013-09-25 15:32 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2013-09-25 23:49 ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-09-25 23:49 ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-09-25 23:55 ` John Stultz [this message]
2013-09-25 23:55 ` John Stultz
2013-09-26 7:58 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2013-09-26 7:58 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2013-09-26 8:20 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2013-09-26 8:20 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2013-09-26 8:52 ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-09-26 8:52 ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-09-26 9:05 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2013-09-26 9:05 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2013-10-01 8:08 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2013-10-01 8:08 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2013-10-01 15:57 ` Stephen Warren
2013-10-01 15:57 ` Stephen Warren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=524377E3.4050806@linaro.org \
--to=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.