From: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@sgi.com>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
Cc: xfs-oss <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfsrestore: fix multi stream support
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 17:02:31 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <524B4677.40200@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <524B4119.8020005@sgi.com>
OOPS hit send too soon.
On 10/01/2013 04:39 PM, Rich Johnston wrote:
>
>
> On 10/01/2013 03:47 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> Hi Rich -
>>
>> On 10/1/13 11:30 AM, Rich Johnston wrote:
>>> If no extents exist, there is no need to call partial_reg() becausee
>>> entire file
>>> there is no data to split up.
>> thought based on the code alone it was self explainitory
>> Does that break something, or is this an optimization?
>
> The original code is broken, would not detect if th.
the entire file was
a hole (no extents) regardless of the value of partialmax.
> If partialmax != 0
> (multi-stream) and no extents exist (entire file is a hole), is there
> anything to restore? Nope so why call parial_reg(). If you do call it
> you will not find anything to restore:
>
>
> 8977 /* If not found, find a free one, fill it in and return */
> 8978 if ( ! isptr ) {
> 8979 mlog(MLOG_NITTY | MLOG_NOLOCK,
> 8980 "partial_reg: no entry found for %llu\n",
> ino);
> 8981 /* find a free one */
> 8982 for (i=0; i < partialmax; i++ ) {
> 8983 if (persp->a.parrest[i].is_ino == 0) {
> 8984 int j;
> 8985
> 8986 isptr = &persp->a.parrest[i];
> 8987 isptr->is_ino = ino;
> 8988 persp->a.parrestcnt++;
> 8989
> 8990 /* Clear all endoffsets (this value is
> 8991 * used to decide if an entry is
> used or
> 8992 * not
> 8993 */
> 8994 for (j=0, bsptr=isptr->is_bs;
> 8995 j < drivecnt; j++, bsptr++) {
> 8996 bsptr->endoffset = 0;
> 8997 }
> 8998
> 8999 goto found;
> 9000 }
> 9001 }
> 9002
> 9003 /* Should never get here. */
>
> And we reach the dreaded comment above :)
>
>>> Also remove the uneeded check in partial_reg() to detect if this is a
>>> multistream restore.
>>
>> Why is it unneeded?
> The check is unneeded because with my fix, partial_reg will never be
> called if partialmax==0 which also means that . Do we really need the extra check?
Scratch the above :)
I meant to say the check was needed in the original code because of the
bug explained above.
example:
create a directory with several files with at least 1 extent
create a file with no extents (i.e. touch empty_file)
Current code will fail for multistream dump/restore and will also fail
for single stream if the partialmax == 0 check is removed from
partial_reg().
In my opinion that check was just a workaround for single stream and no
one tested an empty file with no extents, just file with one extent and
the entire file is a hole.
--Rich
>
>>
>> From a quick read, if partialmax == 0 that measn only 1 drive,
>> and no streams - so it does seem like partial_reg() would have
>> no work to do, so I'm a little confused (but I'm also a total
>> n00b here).e
>>
>> This patch says it fixes multi stream support - what was broken?
>> Is there a testcase (or should there be) that shows the problem?
>>
>> I see changes but I don't know enough about xfsdump to know
>> what's broken & what's being fixed, can you explain a bit more?
>
> Sorry I thought that it was self explanatory ;)
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Eric
>>
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@sgi.com>
>>>
>>> diff --git a/restore/content.c b/restore/content.c
>>> index 54d933c..ecbcf13 100644
>>> --- a/restore/content.c
>>> +++ b/restore/content.c
>>> @@ -7494,6 +7494,7 @@ restore_extent_group( drive_t *drivep,
>>> extenthdr_t ehdr;
>>> off64_t bytesread;
>>> rv_t rv;
>>> + uint num_extents = 0; /* number of extents */
>>>
>>> /* copy data extents from media to the file
>>> */
>>> @@ -7518,6 +7519,7 @@ restore_extent_group( drive_t *drivep,
>>> if ( ehdr.eh_type == EXTENTHDR_TYPE_LAST ) {
>>> break;
>>> }
>>> + num_extents++;
>>>
>>> /* if its an ALIGNment extent, discard the extent.
>>> */
>>> @@ -7572,7 +7574,7 @@ restore_extent_group( drive_t *drivep,
>>> * and certain extended inode flags. Register the portion
>>> * of the file completed here in the persistent state.
>>> */
>>> - if (bstatp->bs_size > restoredsz) {
>>> + if (num_extents && (bstatp->bs_size > restoredsz)) {
>>> partial_reg(drivep->d_index,
>>> bstatp->bs_ino,
>>> bstatp->bs_size,
>>> @@ -8959,9 +8961,6 @@ partial_reg( ix_t d_index,
>>>
>>> endoffset = offset + sz;
>>>
>>> - if ( partialmax == 0 )
>>> - return;
>>> -
>>> pi_lock();
>>>
>>> /* Search for a matching inode. Gaps can exist so we must search
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> xfs mailing list
>>> xfs@oss.sgi.com
>>> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
>>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-01 22:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-01 16:30 [PATCH] xfsrestore: fix multi stream support Rich Johnston
2013-10-01 20:47 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-01 21:39 ` Rich Johnston
2013-10-01 22:02 ` Rich Johnston [this message]
2013-10-02 3:57 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-02 4:17 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-02 4:26 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-02 18:41 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-02 20:03 ` Rich Johnston
2013-10-02 20:13 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-03 13:40 ` Rich Johnston
[not found] ` <20131003212114.493910914@sgi.com>
2013-10-03 22:11 ` [PATCH] xfsdump: handle large, wholly-sparse files Eric Sandeen
2013-10-03 23:11 ` [PATCH V2] " Rich Johnston
2013-10-03 23:16 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-07 19:38 ` [PATCH] xfstests XFS: verify extended attributes after multi-stream xfsdump/xfsrestore rjohnston
2013-10-07 20:32 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-07 20:54 ` Rich Johnston
2013-10-07 21:00 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-08 0:53 ` Dave Chinner
2013-10-08 0:57 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-08 0:58 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-08 14:21 ` Rich Johnston
2013-10-08 19:27 ` Dave Chinner
2013-10-08 19:57 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-08 1:08 ` Dave Chinner
2013-10-08 14:22 ` Rich Johnston
2013-10-08 14:43 ` [PATCH V2] xfstests XFS: verify extended attributes after multi-stream xfsdump/xfsrestore are not lost rjohnston
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=524B4677.40200@sgi.com \
--to=rjohnston@sgi.com \
--cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.